MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950191471 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8290022

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) paxtoni Landaverde-González & Gardner & Moo-Valle & Quezada-Euán & Ayala & Husemann 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6950191471 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaDorsumVertex (graph theory)Margin (machine learning)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) paxtoni Landaverde-González sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 8AB32A78-9274-49AE-B9CA-3D2BF1A925BE Figs 5C–D, 6B, 9–10, 28A, 29A, 30A Diagnosis Females of L. paxtoni sp. nov. can be recognised by having the vertex and mesoscutum with very short, sparse pubescence as if shaved (most noticeable in lateral view where most setae are separated by half or more their length); tegula enlarged (reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view; tegula width/ITS 0.21–0.22) and lateral margin with shallow, minute, and sparse punctures (i = 1–2d) no larger than mesoscutum punctures (sometimes inconspicuous and tegula nearly impunctate); mesoscutum shiny, finely and sparsely punctate (i = 1–3 pd), becoming slightly denser laterad of parapsidal lines (i = 1–2 pd), and with distinct red–brassy reflections medially; mesepisternum shiny, granular and finely, moderately densely punctate (i = 1–1.5 pd); metapostnotum with fine rugae extending onto propodeum dorsolateral slope; discs of T1–T2 with very fine, minute punctures, often hardly visible; and T2 and usually T3 apical impressed areas glabrous and impunctate. Males can be recognized by the same characters, except that the mesoscutum color is less red and more brassy, and the mesepisternum is more densely punctate (i <1 pd), the mesoscutum has sparse plumose setae 0.5–1 OD long (most setae separated by half their length or more in lateral view, especially in posterior half). Differential diagnosis Both sexes of L. paxtoni sp. nov. are most similar to L. yucatanense sp. nov., L. (D.) aureoviride sp. nov., specimens of the Lasioglossum stictaspis species complex, the Nearctic species L. perparvum, and some undescribed species related to L. perparvum which are not known to co-occur with L. paxtoni. See the differential diagnosis for L. yucatanense for characters separating these species. Lasioglossum (D.) aureoviride has the mesoscutum weakly tessellate and sparsely punctate between the parapsidal lines (i = 1–3 pd) and with dense erect setae ~1 OD long (all setae separated by less than half their length in lateral view); T2–T3 apical rims evenly covered with fine setae and/or punctures; mesoscutum with dense erect setae ~1 OD long and subappressed setae 0.25–0.5 OD long; mesepisternum imbricate and very densely punctate (i <0.5 pd). Specimens of Lasioglossum stictaspis species complex have the mesepisternum imbricate and deeply, moderately densely punctate (i ≤ 1.5 pd) with distinct interspaces, T2–T3 apical rims evenly covered with fine setae and/or punctures. Females of L. perparvum have the scutum olive green with no red reflections, tarsi dark brown, scutum tessellate, mesepisternum tessellate with indistinct punctures, and T2–T3 with extensive basolateral fine tomentum covering about half length of segment laterally and apical impressed areas minutely punctate with fine setae associated with punctation. One undescribed species from western Veracruz labeled as L. sp. mex9 on BOLD is especially similar to L. paxtoni sp. nov., but lacks copper-red reflections on the mesoscutum and the tegula is more deeply and distinctly (but still sparsely) punctate. This species is apparently restricted to high elevations in the Sierra Madre Oriental mountains, in contrast to L. paxtoni which is restricted to the Yucatán Peninsula and northern Chiapas. Etymology The specific epithet is in dedication to Prof Robert Paxton, the PhD advisor of PLG and JQE. Type material Holotype MEXICO – Yucatán • ♀; Yaxnic; [20.79° N, 89.62° W]; 8 Apr. 1997; R.W. Brooks, H. Delphin, H. Contreras and U. Mao leg.; ex Momordica charantia; SEMC SM0106374. Paratypes MEXICO – Campeche • 1 ♂; 10 mi N of Hopelchén; [19.89° N, 89.84° W]; 17 Apr. 1962; L. A. Stange leg.; UCDC. – Chiapas • 1 ♀; San Juan Cancuc, Tzajalchén; 16.9474° N, 92.3578° W; elev. 1020 m; 4 Feb. 2010; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.43220 • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; ECOAB.43235 • 1 ♀; San Juan Cancuc, Tzuluwitz; 16.894° N, 92.4019° W; elev. 1270 m; 5 May 2009; Jorge Mérida, César López and T. López leg.; ECOAB.42654. – Quintana Roo • 2 ♂♂; Xcan; [20.87° N, 87.6° W]; 31 Jul. 1962; A. B. Amerson Jr. leg.; SEMC. – Yucatán • 1 ♂; Xmatkuil, 15 km S of Mérida; [20.86° N, 89.62° W]; 13 Feb. 1987; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC • 2 ♀♀; Mérida; [20.97° N, 89.59° W]; Nov. 1961; N.L.H. Krauss leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Mérida, 15 km S of University of Yucatán; [20.83° N, 89.62° W]; 7 Apr. 1997; R.W. Brooks leg.; ex Piscidia piscipula; SEMC SM0105915 • 1 ♂; Yaxnic; [20.79° N, 89.62° W]; 8 Apr. 1997; R.W. Brooks, H. Delphin, H. Contreras and U. Mao leg.; ex Momordica charantia; SEMC SM0106372 (photographed). Other material examined MEXICO – Yucatán • 1 ♀; Alfonso Caso; 20.084° N, 89.1609° W; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; ZMH 842027 • 1 ♂; Yaxcopil; [20°4′4.10″ N, 88°54′23.80″ W]; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 38b; ZMH 81029 • 1 ♀; Santa María; [20°23′32.5″ N, 88°55′14.6″ W]; 26 Jul. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 587e; ZMH 81040 • 1 ♀; Alfonso Caso; [20°05′02.5″ N, 89°09′39.3″ W]; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 81; ZMH 842025 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; original label 87; ZMH 842026 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; original label 91; ZMH 842027 1 ♀; Yaxcopil; [20°4′4.10″ N, 88°54′23.80″ W]; 1 Aug. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 602c; ZMH 842029 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; original label 86; UADY. Floral records CUCURBITACEAE Juss.: Momordica L.: M.charantia L. • FABACEAE Juss.: Piscidia: P. piscipula (L.) Sarg. • SOLANACEAE Adans.: Capsicum L.: C. chinense Jacq. DNA barcodes Five sequences available (BOLD process IDs: LDSPS029-15 to LDSPS033-15). The attribution of these sequences to L. paxtoni sp. nov. is based on their genetic similarity to the undescribed L. sp. mex9, which is morphologically similar to the description of L. paxtoni (unfortunately the specimen originally designated as a holotype was destroyed), and the small number of available sequences (consistent with the low relative abundance of L. paxtoni). The sequences are variable and distinguished from those of other species (maximum intraspecific p-distance 0.82%; minimum interspecific p-distance (to L. yucatanense sp. nov.) 2.89%). Description Female (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Length 3.75 mm; head length 1.05 mm; head width 1.08 mm; fore wing length 2.43 mm. Five female paratypes measured: length 3.75–4.4 mm; head length 1.05–1.11 mm; head width 1.08– 1.17 mm; forewing length 2.43–3.21 mm. COLOUR. Head and mesosoma metallic blue-green with red-brassy reflections dorsally; scape and pedicel dark brown; F1–F10 dark brown dorsally, orange-brown ventrally; tegula orange-brown; wing membrane subhyaline, venation and pterostigma dark brown; legs dark brown with tarsi lighter orangebrown; metasoma dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Light yellow; head and mesosoma with moderately abundant setae (1–2 OD), very short and sparse on vertex, gena, and mesoscutum (<1 OD); lower paraocular area with sparse subappressed tomentum; propodeum with plumose long setae (2–2.5 OD) on lateral and posterior surfaces, in the latter sparser; T1 with sparse complete setose fan; T1–T6 evenly covered with very short, sparse, simple setae, except T1–T2 apical impressed areas glabrous, tarsal segments with plumose, light-yellow setae. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny and moderately densely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); supraclypeal area shiny and sparsely punctate (i = 1–3d); paraocular area shiny and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); frons dull with very fine crowded punctures (i = 0 pd); ocellocular area shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); gena and postgena lineate; tegula lateral margin with a few shallow, minute, and sparse punctures (i = 1–2d), otherwise impunctate; mesoscutum shiny and sparsely punctate medially (i = 1–3 pd), becoming moderately dense laterad of parapsidal lines and posteromedially (i = 1–1.5 pd); mesoscutellum weakly tessellate and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); axilla similar to mesoscutellum; metanotum very finely rugulose; mesepisternum granular, shiny and moderately fine and densely punctate (i = 1–1.5d); metepisternum very finely rugulose; metapostnotum reticulate with fine subparallel rugae reaching posterior margin; propodeum lateral and posterior surface finely reticulate; discs of metasomal terga weakly coriarious and very minutely, sparsely, obscurely punctate (i = 2–4 pd); apical impressed areas impunctate; T2 and usually T3 apical rims impunctate. STRUCTURE. Head square (length/width ratio = 0.99–1.01; holotype:1.0); eyes weakly convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.29–1.31; holotype = 1.33); clypeus ½ below suborbital tangent; antennal sockets close (IAD/AOD = 0.53-0.65), frontal line ending 2.5 OD below median ocellus; gena wider than eye; inner metatibial spur pectinate with 2–3 teeth; tegula relatively large, reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view, with inner posterior margin straight, more bean-shaped; scutellum length 0.22; metapostnotum length 0.15, metapostnotum moderately elongate (MMR ratio = 1.47), weakly rounded posteriorly; propodeum with oblique carina, lateral carina nearly reaching margin of dorsal surface. Male MEASUREMENTS. Length 3.53–3.85 mm; head length 0.86–1.01 mm; head width 0.95–1.18 mm; fore wing length 2.02–2.58 mm. COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma dark turquoise-green to olive green with brassy-gold reflections dorsally; antenna dark brown dorsally, orange-brown ventrally; wing membrane subhyaline, venation and pterostigma dark brown; legs dark brown with tarsi lighter orange-brown; metasoma dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Light yellowish; head and mesosoma with moderately abundant setae (1–2 OD), very short and sparse on vertex and mesoscutum (<1 OD); lower paraocular area with dense subappressed tomentum; mesoscutum with sparse plumose setae 0.5–

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,042

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207