Tragulus williamsoni Kloss 1916
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
6. Northern Chevrotain Tragulus williamsoni French: Chevrotain de Williamson / German: Thailand Kantschil / Spanish: Ciervo ratén de Tailandia Taxonomy. Tragulus williamsoni Kloss, 1916, Meh Lem, Thailand. The recent reallocation of 1. williamsoni to species level was based on one specimen from northern Thailand, because the skull dimensions exceeded those of any other T. kanchitlike chevrotains from the Asian mainland. Recently, two additional specimens from Mengla, Yunnan, China have been identified that appear to support the species-level designation of this taxon. This, however, requires further careful study, because even though the two Chinese skulls are similar in size to the specimen from northern Thailand, verification of the measurements is still required. The taxonomic uncertainty of 71. williamsoni is compounded by the lack of available specimens of chevrotains from close to the type locality of T. williamson: with which to test for conspecificity with 7. kanchil and, if the taxon is validated, to determine whetherit is sympatric or parapatric with 7. kanchil. More material is needed for both 7. williamsoni and 1. kanchil, if it occurs there, from the northern parts of Thailand, adjacent southern China, and possibly northern Laos as well as northern Myanmar, to make an informed judgment. Monotypic. Distribution. Thailand and southern China, mainly the Sanchahe part of the Mengman region and the Darongshu of the Longmen region, both in S. Yunnan, but possibly more widespread with potential presence in Laos, Vietnam, and Myanmar. Descriptive notes. No measurements available. The type specimen of this species was described as larger than other 7. kanchil specimens from the Asian mainland, but with color patterns similar to 7. k. affinis. Photos of this type specimen show uniformly colored pale brown upperparts, with a barely visible darker nape streak; the species was described as being like 7. k. affinis but larger and with the upperparts deeper ochraceous and only moderately annulated with brown. Throat patterns are as in 7 k. affinis, with clearly defined white chin and neck stripes and a reddish-brown transverse throat band that separates the white neck and chin from the white chest (unlike in 7 versicolor, in which this dark band is discontinuous, and the white neck and chin and white chest thus connected). Dental formulais10/3; C1/1;P 3/3; M 3/3 (x2)= 34. Habitat. A recent study in Yunnan showed that the species prefers valleys along banks of rivers or streams in low altitude, where they tend to use middle and lower slopes with the favorite fruit trees Ficus hirtal, Baccaurea samiflora, Alpinia kwangsiensis, and Phrynium capitatum. These plants occur along banks ofrivers or streams. Chevrotain habitat use was mostly affected by tall tree coverage, shrub coverage, and herb coverage, and distance to water. Food and Feeding. Based on its habitat use and tree preferences in Yunnan, the diet of T. williamsoni appears to contain significant amounts offruit. Breeding. Nothing known. Activity patterns. Nothing known. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Nothing known. Status and Conservation. Classified as Data Deficient on The IUCN Red List, The species’ status cannot be assessed due to taxonomic uncertainty and a paucity of data on extent of occurrence, threats, habitat preferences and altitudinal range. Hunting is heavy in the species’ likely range and habitat perturbation is increasing there. The lack of understanding of the population-level effects on the species rule out inferential application of decline-based criteria. On the IUCN assessmentit is suggested that even modest additional information would allow categorization of the species, and thatit would likely warrant either Near Threatened or one of the threatened categories. Bibliography. Aidong Luo et al. (1999), Cao Mingl et al. (2010), Kloss (1916, 1918), Meijaard & Groves (20044, 2004b), Shi Liming & Chen Yuze (1989), Timmins et al. (2008).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».