MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950310580 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5687120

Ephippiochthonius tetrachelatus Preyssler 1790, n. comb.

2017· article· en· W6950310580 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCarapaceCzechExtant taxonFemurHigh resolutionPathognomonic

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ephippiochthonius tetrachelatus (Preyssler, 1790), n. comb. (Figs 1–3, 4–7, 32–39) Type locality. Czech Republic, Prague, Karlovo náměstí (50°04′32″N, 14°25′11″E; 209 m a.s.l.). Distribution. Western Palaearctic Region, chiefly Mediterranean; introduced to Eastern Canada, U.S.A. (including Hawaii), Cuba, Argentina, Seychelles and southwestern Australia (Gardini 2013; Harvey 2013). Records for the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands are given in Zaragoza (2007) and Zaragoza & Vadell (2013). Diagnosis (♂ ♀). A medium-sized, epigean Ephippiochthonius species of the tetrachelatus -group. Movable cheliceral finger without isolated subapical tooth (di) and with spinneret in both sexes, lyrifissure ldb present; two pairs of eyes with lenses, posterior margin of carapace with 2 macrosetae or rarely with 2 macrosetae and with 1 lateral microseta on one side; pedipalp with femoral chaetotaxy 3:6:2:5:1; chelal hand not depressed or very weakly at level of ib / isb, with a long, low and rounded hump distad of ib / isb and moderate slope between trichobothria ib / isb and eb; fixed chelal finger with 14–22 teeth; distal half of movable chelal finger with 6–8 pointed teeth with dental canals, proximal half without a marginal lamina, with 5–9 low vestigial teeth; pedipalpal femur (♂) 5.4–7.5, (♀) 5.3–7.0 times longer than broad, length (♂) 0.47–0.69 mm, (♀) 0.52–0.76 mm; chela (♂) 4.4–5.8, (♀) 4.2–5.8 times longer than deep, length (♂) 0.65–0.95 mm, (♀) 0.71–1.04 mm; ratio movable chelal finger/chelal hand (♂) 1.3–1.4, (♀) 1.2–1.3; all chelal lyrifissure patterns present with their standard complements. Non-type material examined. Czech Republic, Prague: Chodov, 2 ♂ (FSC), 23.V.1998, under stones; Dolní Počernice, 2 ♂, 3 ♀ (1 ♂, 2 ♀ FSC; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ DEUA), 31.VIII.1998, under stones; Čiklova street, 2 ♂ (FSC, DEUA), 01.IX.1998, leaf litter; Malostranský cemetery, 2 ♂ (FSC), 21.IX.1998, leaf litter; Husovy sady, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (FSC), 21.IX.1998, leaf litter; Královice-Hájek (U. Markéty), 5 ♂, 4 ♀ (2 ♂, 2 ♀ FSC; 3 ♂, 2 ♀ DEUA), 01.V.1999, under the stones; Tyršův vrch, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (FSC), 13.XII.1999, leaf litter; Botanic garden, 1 ♀ (FSC), 29.VIII.2000, under a piece of wood; all leg. F. Šťáhlavský. Description (♂ ♀). Medium-sized epigean species. Integument pigmented; marked hispid granulation on lateral surfaces of carapace, on cheliceral hand and on bases of chelal fingers. Carapace equal to or slightly shorter or longer than broad and weakly constricted posteriorly; medial part of anterior margin weakly prominent, rarely with epistome, and strongly dentate; anterior eyes with strongly convex lens (diameter 0.040–0.060 mm), 0.030–0.040 mm from anterior margin of carapace, posterior eyes more with more or less weakly convex lens than anterior pair, both pairs of eyes with reflecting tapeta. Chaetotaxy: 18 macrosetae and 2 preocular microsetae on each side, rarely one, setal formula mm 4mm:6:4:2:2, anteromedial setae 0.07–0.11 mm long; 4 lyrifissures anteriorly and 2 posteriorly. Chelicera (Fig. 4) with 6 setae and 2 lateral microsetae on hand, seta vb short and almost twice as long as microsetae; hand with 5 dorsal and 1 ventral lyrifissure, lyrifissure ldb present. Fixed finger with 6–9 teeth decreasing in size proximally, 1–2 distal teeth distinctly larger than others and 4–6 proximal microtubercles. Movable finger without an isolated subapical tooth (di), with 5–6 teeth decreasing in size proximally, the distal tooth larger than others, 3–5 proximal microtubercles; spinneret prominent in female, lower and more rounded in male; seta gl 0.53–0.66 from base of movable finger. Rallum with 11 blades. Serrula exterior with 14 blades, serrula interior 12 blades. Chaetotaxy of tergites 4:4:4:4:6:6:6:6:1T2T1:4:1T2T1:0, tergites IX and XI each with 2 sublateral tactile setae. Chaetotaxy of sternites 10–11:(3)8–10(3):(2)7–8(2):8–9:6:6:6:6: 2T1T2:0:2, lateral setae on sternite III microsetal in size, sternite X with 2 submedial tactile setae (Fig. 5); in addition, genital notch of male flanked by 6–9 setae on each side and 4+4 internal glandular setae. Pedipalpal coxa with 5 setae (including 2 on manducatory process); coxa I 3 + 3 marginal microsetae, distal marginal seta of pedipalpal disk distinctly longer than the marginal seta of coxa I; II 4 + 7–12 bipinnate coxal spines, III 5 + 3–7 bipinnate coxal spines and IV 6; intercoxal tubercle bisetose. Pedipalp with femoral chaetotaxy 3:6:2:5:1, rarely 3 setae in the posterior dorsal row of one chela and 2 in that of the other. Chela (Figs 1–3) with hand not depressed or very weakly at level of ib / isb, with a long, low and rounded hump distad of ib / isb and moderate slope between trichobothria ib / isb and eb; dorsal-antiaxial surface of the chelal hand between the hump and trichobothria eb / esb flattened, limited by a marked edge; ventral intercondylar bow-like protuberance (ip) present (Figs 34, 35, 39); chaetotaxy 4:5:3, seta ph3 lacking, setae ih1, ih3 and ih4 approximately level with trichobothria ib / isb; distal end of hand and bases of chelal fingers with sclerotized condylar complex. Fixed finger with 14–22 mostly pointed and weakly reclined teeth progressively decreasing in size and with dental canals, 1‒2 distal ones small, 2–4 most proximal teeth rounded, 2–4 microtubercles at base; tip of finger with an accessory tooth (td) on antiaxial face; tip of fixed chelal finger of male with a deep hollow on paraxial face and subdistal protuberance (sp); one pair of very short antiaxial sensory setae (as) at the base, level with or proximad of lyrifissure fb, distance between them distinctly shorter than finger depth at base; 3–4 teeth, rarely 5, at level of est / it occupying 0.1 mm, distance between successive apices 0.024–0.040 mm. Distal half of movable finger with 6–8 pointed teeth with dental canals, the distal one small (rarely absent); proximal half without marginal lamina, with 5–9 low vestigial teeth reaching trichobothrium sb or halfway between sb and b, mostly with dental canals; basal condyle (bc) enlarged and apodeme long and apically indented (Figs 6, 7, 38); coupled sensilla pc halfway between b and sb, mostly closer to sb. Trichobothria as in Figs 1‒2; trichobothria ebesb-ist mostly in a straight line, ist always distad of esb and well proximad of lyrifissure fb. All chelal lyrifissure patterns present with their standard complements (Figs 33, 36, 37). Measurements and ratios. The following data are from the description of Gardini (2013), who measured a large number of specimens from many populations assigned to this species: Male, followed by female in square brackets: Body 1.3–1.8 [1.4–1.9]. Carapace 0.35–0.50/0.36–0.46 (0.9–1.1) [0.37–0.55/0.38–0.54] Chelicera 0.29– 0.41/0.14–0.19 (1.9–2.2) [0.32–0.45/0.16–0.21], movable finger length 0.13–0.19 [0.16–0.23]. Pedipalp: femur 0.47–0.69/0.08–0.12 (5.4–7.5) [0.52–0.76/ 0.09–0.14 (5.3–7.0)], chela 0.65–0.95/0.12–0.17 (4.4–5.8) [0.71–1.04/ 0.14–0.23 (4.2–5.8)], hand 0.27–0.42 (2.0–2.5) [0.30–0.44 (1.8–2.3)], movable finger 0.38–0.56 [0.40–0.60]; ratio movable finger/hand 1.3–1.4 [1.2–1.3], femur/movable finger 1.2–1.4, femur/carapace 1.3–1.5. Remarks. The presence of E. tetrachelatus seems less frequent in the Iberian Peninsula than in Italy and Central Europe. However, it should be taken into consideration that a disproportionate number of the samples of Iberian Chthoniidae studied in both the previous literature and the present work come from hypogean environments in comparison to those collected from epigean environments. Most literature records of E. tetrachelatus for the Iberian Peninsula need to be verified by restudying the available specimens concerned, and it will not be surprising if some of them are found to correspond to other species [e.g. misidentifications of E. andalucia n. sp. by Zaragoza & Pérez (2013) and Zaragoza (2013a)].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,950
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,000
Communication savante0,0040,001
Science ouverte0,0060,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle