Cerodontha (Xenophytomyza) biseta Hendel
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cerodontha (Xenophytomyza) biseta (Hendel) (Figs. 1–3, 7) Dizygomyza biseta Hendel, 1920: 135. Cerodonta uniformis Hering, 1926: 223 –224. Cerodonta biseta, Hendel, 1927: 254. Dizygomyza (Poemyza) crassinervis Frey, 1946: 47. Cerodonta (Xenophytomyza) biseta: Frey 1946: 51. Cerodontha (Xenophytomyza) biseta: Nowakowski 1967: 655. Recognition. Cerodontha (Xenophytomyza) biseta has been recently redescribed and/or illustrated by Nowakowski (1973), Spencer (1976) and Zlobin (1993). The phallus of this species has a pale membranous distal process that has been omitted in older papers and was illustrated for the first time by Zlobin (1993). The phallus of the Jamaican specimen of C. (X.) biseta is identical to the European and Nearctic specimens (Figs. 1–2). Although generally described as a completely black or brown species, the inner margin of the orbits, the frons and gena of C. (X.) biseta are sometimes yellowishbrown. Distribution. Cerodontha (Xenophytomyza) biseta (Hendel) is a widespread western Palearctic species that was first recorded in the Nearctic region by Tschirnhaus (1993), based on a few specimens from Ontario and New Brunswick, Canada. This species is apparently expanding its range in eastern Canada and the northeastern United States and has been collected in most eastern Nearctic localities sampled by Lyman Entomological Museum staff and students since 2000. The single specimen of C. (X.) biseta collected from the Jamaican Blue Mountains (Fig. 7) represents the first Neotropical record of Xenophytomyza. All subgenera of Cerodontha have now been recorded in the Neotropical Region except for the Holarctic subgenus Phytagromyza Hendel. Host plants. Two host plants have so far been recorded for this species. Tschirnhaus (1991) collected C. (X.) biseta from emergence traps set up over the grasses Poa nemoralis L. and Holcus lanatus L. in Germany. Many specimens of C. (X.) biseta were also swept from Poa nemoralis in Ottawa, Canada by J.R. Vockeroth (Tschirnhaus, 1993). Remarks. Based on its known distribution (Fig. 7) and its abundance in recent collecting, C. (X.) biseta was probably introduced to North America by human activity, like other Diptera with similar patterns of distribution and abundance (Wheeler et al. 1999). The same assumption could probably be applied to the Jamaican specimen, which was collected in a disturbed agricultural area near a coffee plantation and guest house (T.A. Wheeler, pers. comm.). The alternative hypothesis that C. (X.) biseta in Jamaica represents a native, relict population is less likely as this species has never been collected in other high elevation areas of the Caribbean, Central America or southeastern North America. Because only one specimen has been recorded in Jamaica, the definitive establishment of this species cannot be confirmed until more specimens are collected. Material examined. CANADA: New Brunswick: Charlotte County, Oak Bay, 16– 21.vii.1992, J.E. O’Hara, Malaise (2M, LEM); Doakstown picnic area (46°32.7’N, 66°09.5’W), sweep along small stream on steep hillside, 17.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler (1M, 1F, LEM); Kouchibouguac N.P. 6.vii.1977, J.F. McAlpine (3M, CNC); same except 12.vii.1977 (1F, CNC); same except 13.vii.1977 (6F, CNC); same except 9.vii.1977 (3M, 1F, 2?, CNC); same except J.R. Vockeroth 9.vii.1977 (1M, CNC); Mactaquac Prov. Park (44°57.2’N, 66°53’W), sweep sedges in forest near lake, 16.vii.2002, T.A. Wheeler (2M, LEM); Middle Sackville (45°55.4’N, 64°21.4’W), sweep at old railway line, 19.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler (2M, 1F, LEM); Murray Beach Prov. Park (46°10.7’N, 63°58.8’W), sweep path in small forest patch, 18.vii.2002, T. A. Wheeler (4M, LEM); Sackville, near Mt. Allison Univ. (45°53.9’N, 64°22.5’W), sweep old garden in vacant lot, 19.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler (3M, LEM). Nova Scotia: Cape Breton Island, North Shore (46°24.8’N, 60°28.5’W), sweep forest path near ocean beach, 21.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler, (6M, LEM); Hampton (44°54.7’N, 68°20.5’W), sweep old meadow above marine beach, 26.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler (10M, LEM). Ontario: Baptiste Lake (45°10’N, 78°00’W), sweep old railway line, clearings in forest, 15.vii.2001, J. Forrest (2M, 1F, LEM); Lanark Co., Mississippi Lake Natl. Wildlife area, sweep lakeshore and marshland 28.vi.2001, M. Pollet (1M, LEM); Ottawa, 30.vi.1990, swept from Poa nemoralis in Acer wood, J.R. Vockeroth (15M, 13F, CNC). Québec: Gaspé, Forillon N.P. Cap des Rosiers (48°50’N, 64°12’W), sweep grass, 06.viii.2000, H. VaradySzabo (2F, LEM); Gaspé, Haldimand (48°47’N, 64°22’W), sweep path in forest, 18.viii.2001, H. VaradySzabo (1M, LEM); Gaspé, PetitCap, sweep vegetation along path in forest, 08.viii.2001, H. VaradySzabo (1M, LEM); Gaspé, ZEC York Baillargeon (48°49’N, 64°52’W), forest edge near Lac Pauline, 26.vii.2000, H. Varady Szabo (1M, 1F, LEM); Gaspésie, l’AnseauGriffon nr. Parc Forrillon (48°55’N, 64°19’W), sweep, 31.vii.2001, S. Boucher (1M, LEM); Gaspésie, Ile Bonaventure (48°30’N, 64°10’W), 3km from Côte de Percé, sweep grass, 28.vii.2000, H. VaradySzabo (1M, LEM); Hudson, Parc Lévy Macdonald (45°27’N, 74°09’W), sweep along path in disturbed forest, 26.vi.2001, J. Forrest (1F, LEM); TerrasseVaudreuil, Molson Nature Reserve (45°23.57’N, 73°58.81’W), sweep path in forest, 01.vii.1999, V. Crecco (1F, LEM). UNITED STATES: Maine: Penobscot Co. Grindstone Falls (45°43.8’N, 68°35.4’W), sweep along Penobscot R., 21.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler (2M, LEM). New Hampshire: Coos Co., 1km E Stark (44°36’N, 71°24’W), sweep along Ammonoosuc River, 08.viii.2000, J. Forrest (1M, LEM); Coos Co., White Mt. Nat. For., Dolly Copp (44°19’N, 71°13’W), sweep forest nr. river, 08.viii.2000, T.A. Wheeler (1M, LEM). New York: Hamilton Co., Raquette Lake (43°48.4’N, 74°36.6’W), sweep veg. at lake margin, 31.vii.2002, J. Forrest & T. Wheeler (1M, LEM). JAMAICA: Blue Mtn. Whitfield Hall 4200 ft, 10.ix.1988. sweep at roadside, T.A. Wheeler (1M, LEM).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».