MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950555083 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8071223

Digital Humanities and Industry: identifying employment niches. A first overview on challenges and potential solutions

2023· article· en· W6950555083 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Établissements canadiensTrinity College
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransferable skills analysisCurriculumPresentation (obstetrics)Asset (computer security)Digital humanitiesLeverage (statistics)Cultural heritageMultinational corporationProposition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This presentation follows a workshop session that was held at the beginning of the DARIAH Annual Event 2023 in Budapest, HU. An informational booklet, designed by Tom Gheldof, details each of the DH Masters which we were able to investigate. It helped nourish our discussions during the workshop and thus is included as well. Postgraduate education in Digital Humanities (DH) has often led to careers for students in either the research or cultural heritage sector. Traditionally, the relationship between industry and Cultural Heritage institutions has typically been conceived as a collaboration to leverage funding mechanisms and develop projects to pursue a common interest, such as a technical innovation, or a knowledge sharing endeavour. The skills acquired within Digital Humanities (DH) taught postgraduate degrees are interdisciplinary and therefore transferable by their very nature, something that has been recognised among larger multinational companies. Indeed, a strong humanities education and familiarity with our methods can be an asset for business. Best practices for data stewardship and data management are similar whether one focuses on cultural heritage data, or business data, even if there are particularities. Yet among small and medium enterprises (SMEs) the proposition of employing a graduate from a field that is still in its relative infancy compared with more traditional disciplines can be seen as a risk. It therefore becomes necessary to identify the gaps, and indeed niches that rest between the current provision of training among DH scholars at a postgraduate (Masters) level, and the needs of the companies and future employers of DH graduates. Indeed, greater collaboration and fluidity between the cultural heritage and academic sphere, and that of business, via the DH alumni, can lead to greater outcomes for both, as these students can bring the best practices of both sectors in their future careers, thereby enriching both sectors and establishing interpersonal links (and the collaboration that grows from these links) via their networks. In light of this, it becomes necessary to foster internships that encourage and nurture experimental data spaces between cultural heritage, industry and academia. This paper will therefore share the conversation around the relationship between taught postgraduate DH programmes and industry by presenting the outcomes of a joint working-group workshop to be held on the periphery of the DARIAH Annual Event 2023. Furthermore, it will also include the results of preparatory surveys and interviews with directors and coordinators of various DH postgraduate programmes across Europe, specifically identifying the challenges and professional issues experienced by both DH Masters directors, and their alumni. This paper addresses the following key objectives: Identify the professional challenges and (new) employment opportunities of DH postgraduate taught programmes and their alumni at the European scale. Identify the benefits such a collaboration and exchange between the two sectors can bring. Identify opportunities and good practices of internships with industry and cultural heritage institutions, and their associated challenges. Strengthen the networking opportunities between master degrees, in such a way that expertise can be mapped at a pan-Infrastructural level to share and exchange trainers and trainees in the frame of Erasmus mobilities or Erasmus Mundus programmes. Our presentation will give visibility to these outputs, as a first step in a long-term effort to improve collaboration between industry, cultural heritage institutions and academia (specifically taught postgraduate DH degrees) in the frame of research infrastructures.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,063

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,004
Communication savante0,0140,016
Science ouverte0,0020,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,270
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,001 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDigital Humanities and ScholarshipTravaux en français237 207