UNIT F, ANGEL WORKS, ANGEL WAY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The results of the investigations have revealed a sequence of Leyton Gravel overlain by Enfield Silt ('brickearth') and Made Ground. Here, the Gravel surface lies at a level of 8.5m OD, and it is thought likely that the site lies above the general level of the Holocene floodplain of the River Lea; no peat or tufaceous deposits were identified such as those recorded at lower levels within the alluvium at Edmonton EcoPark (Batchelor et al., 2019), Stonehill Business Park (Young, 2014) or Advent Way (Green et al., 2006). A substantially reworked, coarse-grained Enfield Silt deposit was recorded overlying the Gravel in the northern part of the site at between 8.5 and 10m OD, considered to be of very low palaeoenvironmental potential. Within the observed sequence in the northern area of the site there would appear to be no potential for peat or tufaceous deposits, although no records were available for the southern area of the site. Given that the wider model indicates that the Gravel surface declines in this direction, it is not clear if a different sequence, including alluvial deposits, may be present here. In terms of its Palaeolithic archaeological potential, it is considered unlikely that that the deposits at the site will contain Palaeolithic archaeological remains, either in primary context or as individual artefacts contemporary with the deposition of the Gravel or Enfield Silt. However, on the basis of the unknown nature of the sequence in the southern part of the site, it is recommended that further geoarchaeological monitoring is undertaken of any geotechnical interventions or excavations in this area. Further observations will help to clarify the nature of the sequence here, and provide an opportunity for sampling any organic deposits or examining the Enfield Silt for Palaeolithic artefacts. The results of the investigations have revealed a sequence of Leyton Gravel overlain by Enfield Silt ('brickearth') and Made Ground. Here, the Gravel surface lies at a level of 8.5m OD, and it is thought likely that the site lies above the general level of the Holocene floodplain of the River Lea; no peat or tufaceous deposits were identified such as those recorded at lower levels within the alluvium at Edmonton EcoPark (Batchelor et al., 2019), Stonehill Business Park (Young, 2014) or Advent Way (Green et al., 2006). A substantially reworked, coarse-grained Enfield Silt deposit was recorded overlying the Gravel in the northern part of the site at between 8.5 and 10m OD, considered to be of very low palaeoenvironmental potential. Within the observed sequence in the northern area of the site there would appear to be no potential for peat or tufaceous deposits, although no records were available for the southern area of the site. Given that the wider model indicates that the Gravel surface declines in this direction, it is not clear if a different sequence, including alluvial deposits, may be present here. In terms of its Palaeolithic archaeological potential, it is considered unlikely that that the deposits at the site will contain Palaeolithic archaeological remains, either in primary context or as individual artefacts contemporary with the deposition of the Gravel or Enfield Silt. However, on the basis of the unknown nature of the sequence in the southern part of the site, it is recommended that further geoarchaeological monitoring is undertaken of any geotechnical interventions or excavations in this area. Further observations will help to clarify the nature of the sequence here, and provide an opportunity for sampling any organic deposits or examining the Enfield Silt for Palaeolithic artefacts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».