MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950578348 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6402939

Myotis riparius Handley 1960

2019· article· en· W6950578348 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDorsumSubgenusSetaDNA barcodingTaxonomy (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

389. Riparian Myotis Myotis riparius French: Murin des ruisseaux / German: Ufermausohr / Spanish: Ratonero ripario Taxonomy. Myotis simus riparius Handley, 1960, “Facarcuna Village, 3,200 fi. [= 975 m], Rio Pucro, Darién, Panama.” Subgenus Pyzonix; ruber species group. Phylogenetic reconstructions using mitochondrial and nuclear genes indicated the distinction of M. riparius from M. simus and other congeners. Marked geographical variation occurs in cranial and external morphology. Monotypic. Distribution. Widely distributed in Neotropics, occurring from S Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama S into all South American countries, except Chile; also on Trinidad I. Descriptive notes. Head-body ¢. 43-45 mm, tail 28-48 mm, ear 10-14 mm, hindfoot 6—10 mm, forearm 32-3-39- 8 mm; weight 4-7 g. The Riparian Myotis is morphologically similar to its Neotropical congeners. Fur is long (dorsal fur 5-9 mm; ventral fur 4-8 mm) and woolly. Dorsal hairs are unicolored, without contrast between bases and tips. Ventral hairs are bicolored, with dark brown bases, yellowish tips, and strong contrast between bases and tips. Specimens from Central America and Amazon Basin generally have reddish brown or cinnamon-brown dorsal fur, with a few individuals having brownish or blackish dorsal fur. Most individuals from south-eastern Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina have brownish or blackish dorsal fur, with a few reddish brown or cinnamon-brown individuals. Ears are comparatively short, extending forward halfway from eye to nostril. Antitragal notch is barely evident. Tragus is pointed,slightly curving outward above and convex below, with small triangular lobule at outer base (length 4-11 mm). Membranes are mummy brown; plagiopatagium is broadly attached to foot at bases oftoes. Fringe of hairs along trailing edge of uropatagium is absent; upper and lower surfaces of uropatagium are barely covered with hairs. Baculum is narrow and shallow, with pointed shaft, but widens suddenly near proximal end. Skull is mediumsized (greatest skull lengths 13-2-15- 2 mm); parietalis inclined forward; occipital region is generally flattened posteriorly; sagittal crest is generally present, ranging from low to high; lambdoidal crests are always present, ranging from low to medium; P? is generally aligned with P* and P*, and visible in profile view but might be displaced lingually, being visible or not. Height ofskull crests and P* position vary geographically. Most individuals from Central America, Amazon Basin, and Guiana Shield have medium to high sagittal and lambdoidal crests, and occipital region is flattened posteriorly. Populations from south-eastern Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina tend to have low to medium sagittal and lambdoidal crests, and occipital region is slightly rounded. P? is either crowded lingually or positioned in tooth row but not visible labially, more frequently in individuals from northern localities. In individuals from south-eastern Brazil, P? is generally in tooth row and visible labially. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 44 and FN = 50, with three large and one small metacentric and 17 acrocentric pairs of autosomes. X-chromosomeis medium submetacentric, and Y-chromosome is small acrocentric. Habitat. Wide variety of habitats such tropical rainforests, savannas, xerophytic formations, primary forests, and areas with different levels of human disturbance, including agriculturalfields, from sea level up to elevations of¢. 2000 m. Food and Feeding. The Riparian Myotis forages in forested areas and over water. Its diet includes a large variety of insects, particularly Coleoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Orthoptera, caught in flight. Breeding. In Costa Rica, the Riparian Myotis is considered seasonal monoestrous, with high prevalence of pregnant females in April-June. Pregnant females were observed in August in Peru. Birth of one young was observed in November in Uruguay. One pregnant female, with one embryo of 7 mm crown-rump length, was collected in February in Panama. Most births seem to be associated with rainy and warm seasons in South American rainforests. Activity patterns. The Riparian Myotis emerges just before sunset. In rainforest areas in south-eastern Brazil, its activity is concentrated in two periods: first five hours after sunset and last two hours before sunrise. In Argentina, colonies roosted under tree bark of Schinopsis (Anacardiaceae) and in a house roof in a rural area. In Brazil, they were found in caves and crevices in rocky outcrops. Echolocation calls have strongly FM initial components, terminating with short CF components. Mean call parameters in South America are start frequency of 102-7 kHz (98-6-106-4 kHz), end frequency of 61-6 kHz (60-5-63-1 kHz), peak frequency of 66-6 kHz (64-4-70-2 kHz), bandwidth of 41-2 kHz (36-9-44-7 kHz), and duration of 4-4 milliseconds (3:8-5-4 milliseconds). Movements, Home range and Social organization. Short recapture distances in Costa Rica indicate small home ranges. The Riparian Myotis uses lower forest strata, although it also explores forest canopies. It roosts in colonies of up to 50 individuals and with other bat species such as Common Black Myotis (M. nigricans), Silver-tipped Myotis (M. albescens), and Pallas’s Mastiff Bats (Molossus molossus). Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Riparian Myotis is widespread, apparent has large populations with no decline, and occurs in several protected areas. Bibliography. Arias-Aguilar et al. (2018), Barquez, Mares & Braun (1999), Barquez, Perez et al. (2016c¢), Bernard (2001), Dias & Peracchi (2007), Handley (1960), Kalko & Handley (2001), Kalko et al. (1996), LaVal (1973b), LaVal & Fitch (1977), LaVal & Rodriguez-Herrera (2002), Lépez-Gonzaélez et al. (2001), Moratelli & Morielle-Versute (2007), Moratelli et al. (2013), Novaes, Souza & Moratelli (2017), Simmons (2005), Simmons & Voss (1998), Wilson (2008b).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0310,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,180 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetBat Biology and Ecology Studies→Travaux en français237 207→