MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950729314 · doi:10.5683/sp3/w3tbzy

The development of a synthetic dataset of women at risk of readmission following stillbirth deliveries in Uganda

2025· dataset· en· W6950729314 sur OpenAlexafffundabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesMichael Smith Health Research BC
Mots-clésData collectionLeverage (statistics)Medical recordPublic healthUploadPregnancyHealth careRisk assessment

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<br/><strong>Background:</strong> In 2020, 287,000 mothers died from complications of pregnancy or childbirth; one-third of these deaths (30%) occur during the first 6 weeks after birth. Precision public health approaches leverage risk prediction to identify the most vulnerable patients and inform decisions around use of scarce resources, including the frequency, intensity, and type of postnatal care follow-up visits. However, these approaches may not accurately or precisely predict risk for specific sub-groups of women who are statistically underrepresented in the total population, such as women who experience stillbirths. <br /> <br /><strong>Methods:</strong> We leverage our existing dataset of sociodemographic and clinical variables and health outcomes for mother and baby dyads in Uganda to generate a synthetic dataset to enhance our risk prediction model for identifying women at a high-risk of death or readmission in the 6 weeks after a hospital delivery. <br/> <br /><strong>Data Collection Methods:</strong> The original mom and baby project data were collected at the point of care using encrypted study tablets and these data were then uploaded to a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database hosted at the BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute (Vancouver, Canada). Following delivery and obtaining informed written consent, trained study nurses collected data grouped according to four periods of care; admission, delivery, discharge, and six-week post-discharge follow up. Data from admission and delivery were captured from the hospital medical record where possible and by direct observation, direct measurement or patient interview when not. Discharge and post-discharge data were collected by observation, measurement or interview. Six-weeks after delivery, field officers contacted every mother and/or caregivers of newborns who survived to discharge to determine vital status, readmission and care seeking for illnesses and routine postnatal care. In-person visits were completed in situations where participants could not be reached by phone. <br/> Mothers who had experienced a stillbirth were filtered from the overall dataset. The synthetic dataset was subsequently based off the stillbirth cohort and evaluated it to ensure its statistical properties were maintained. <br /> <br /><strong>Data Processing Methods:</strong> Synthetic data and evaluation metrics were generated using the synthpop R package. The first variable (column) in the dataset is generated via random sampling with replacement with subsequent variables generated conditioned on all previously synthesized variables using a pre-specified algorithm. We used the classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm as it is non-parametric and compatible with all data types (continuous, categorical, ordinal). Additional setup for generating the synthetic dataset included identifying eligible and relevant variables for synthesis and outlining rules for variables that have branching logic (i.e., variables that are only entered if a previous variable has a specific response). <br/> For evaluation, we used the utility metric recommended by the authors of the synthpop package, the standardized propensity-score mean squared error (pMSE) ratio which measures how easy it is to tell whether a data point comes from the original data or the synthetic dataset. All the standardized pMSE ratios were below 10, which is the suggested cut-off for acceptable utility as proposed by the synthpop authors. Plots were also generated to visually compare the univariate distribution of each variable in the synthetic dataset against the original dataset. <br /> <br /><strong>Ethics Declaration:</strong> Ethics approvals have been obtained from the Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH) Institutional Review Board (SPH-2021-177), the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST) in Uganda (HS2174ES) and the University of British Columbia in Canada (H21-03709). This study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05730387).<br > <br /><strong>Abbreviations:</strong> <br > JRRH: Jinja Regional Referral Hospital <br > MRRH: Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital<br > PNC: Post-natal care<br > SES: Socio-economic index<br > SpO2: Oxygen saturation<br > <br /><strong>Study Protocol & Supplementary Materials:</strong> <br > <a href = "https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/EIUHJF">Smart Discharges for Mom & Baby 2.0: A cohort study to develop prognostic algorithms for post-discharge readmission and mortality among mother-infant dyads </a><br >

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBorealisTravaux en français237 207