Data for: On the use of kinship and familiarity associated social information in mediating Drosophila melanogaster oviposition decisions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Decisions about where to lay one’s eggs are of great importance, as the specific conditions in one’s offspring developmental environment may be critical to their subsequent survival and lifetime reproductive success. Information produced by conspecifics can potentially be useful to an individual’s oviposition decision-making process as this “social information” may provide an energetically cheaper means of assessing site suitability rather than acquiring it personally. However, not all conspecific public information may be equally beneficial, and cues produced by kin may be especially valuable as they might signal uniquely suitable microenvironments, as well as suggesting other fitness advantages resulting from improved foraging success and/or a decreased risk of competition/cannibalism amongst kin compared to sites where unrelated conspecifics are located. Using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, we explored whether public information use is associated with kin-based egg-laying decisions. Kinship is potentially recognized in several ways, including cues produced by environmentally-associated gut microbiota of the egg-laying flies, and so we also explored whether there were biases in how focal females interacted with cues from individuals that differed in both their genetic relatedness, as well as their environmental “familiarity.” In a series of inter-connected assays, we examined the egg-laying behaviour of females that interacted with a choice of potential egg-laying substrates that differed in the manner of their prior conspecific exposure. Not only do female flies lay more eggs on sites that had cues left behind by conspecifics compared to unexposed substrates, but they also exhibited strong biases in their oviposition patterns that was consistent with being sensitive to the kinship status of the prior substrate occupants. Furthermore, while females did not apparently discriminate between sites differing in prior egg abundance, they did exhibit bias in their egg-laying based on the population of origin of the demonstrator female. The basis of the kinship categorization by ovipositing females appears to be based on phenotypes that reflect true genetic relatedness that are neither mimicked nor disrupted by the conspecific’s developmental environment. These results highlight the potential usefulness of D. melanogaster as a model to understand the evolution of social behaviour in the expression of decision-making. The data here represent behavioural and reproductive data collected in four inter-related experiments (counts of visits, number of offspring). The files are saved in .csv tables.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,242 | 0,076 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».