São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This fact sheet and call to action is supported by the World Hypertension League, Argentinian Society of Hypertension, Asia-Pacific Regional Office of the World Hypertension League, South Asian Regional Office of the World Hypertension League, African Research Universities Alliance, Belgian Hypertension Committee, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, Brazilian Hypertension Society, Bulgarian Hypertension League, Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social (Costa Rican Social Security Fund), Cameroon Heart Foundation, Chinese Hypertension League, Colleagues In Care, Hypertension Canada, European Society of Hypertension, European Society of Cardiology Council on Hypertension, Ibadan Center of Excellence for Non-communicable Diseases, Indian Society of Hypertension, International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, International Society of Hypertension, International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy, International Society of Nephrology, Iranian Heart Foundation, Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group, Latin American Society of Nephrology and Hypertension, Latvian Society of Hypertension and Atherosclerosis, Mongolian Society of Hypertension, National Technical Advisory Committee of the Arterial Hypertension Program of Cuba (Ministry of Public Health), NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Cardiovascular Outcomes Improvement (Australia), Onom Foundation (Mongolia), Philippine Society of Hypertension, Resolve to Save Lives, Saudi Hypertension Management Society, Sociedade Portuguesa de Hipertensão, South Asia Regional Office of the World Hypertension League, Stroke Control Innovations Initiative of Nigeria, Stroke Investigative Research and Educational Network (SIREN), Sudanese Society of Hypertension, Swedish Society for Hypertension, Stroke and Vascular Medicine, Stroke Association Support Network-Ghana, Taiwan Hypertension Society, Taiwan Society of Cardiology, Thai Hypertension Society, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, World Hypertension Action Group, World Health Summit, World Stroke Organization. NRCC was a paid consultant to the Novartis Foundation (2016-2017) to support their program to improve hypertension control in low- to middle-income countries, which includes travel support for site visits and a contract to develop a survey. NRCC has provided paid consultative advice on accurate blood pressure assessment to Midway Corporation (2017) and is an unpaid member of World Action on Salt and Health (WASH). AES received speaker fees from Novartis and Omron for scientific lectures on blood pressure and risk assessment, and Servier for presenting on raising awareness of blood pressure measurement. She is a paid consultant to Abbott Pharmaceuticals on antihypertensive medication and is President of the International Society of Hypertension. MAW has served as a consultant to AbbVie and Bristol Myers Squibb on drug safety and has received travel funds from Omron. He is a member of advisory boards of Medtronic, ReCor, and Ablative Solutions. MO reports honoraria for talks from Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Takeda Inc GP reports honoraria from Omron Health Care, Sanofi, and Servier. AR reports conference support by Servier. PW, LAB, PO, XHZ, CV, TK, DL, MJ, AM, FLP, MB, EB, and JS do not have any financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».