Clinicopathologic significance and prognostic value of circRNAs in osteosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Osteosarcoma is the most prevalent malignant osseous sarcoma in children and adolescents, whose prognosis is still relatively poor nowadays. Recent studies have shown the critical function and potential clinical applications of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in osteosarcoma. Our review aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis to explore their clinicopathologic significance and prognostic value. Methods The structured literature was conducted via eight electronic databases and four gray literature sources until 20 Feb 2021 to identify eligible studies. The data was extracted directly from the articles or reconstructed based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool was used to assess study quality. The clinicopathologic significance of circRNAs was measured through odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while the prognostic value was evaluated through hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study characteristics. An additional analysis was performed to investigate the relation between circ_0002052 and osteosarcoma. Results Fifty-two studies were identified, in which 38 on clinicopathologic features and 36 on survival prognosis were included in quantitative analysis. The overall study quality was moderate with a median NOS score of 5.5 stars (range 3 to 8). For clinicopathologic features, dysregulated circRNAs were related to larger tumor size (OR 2.122, 95%CI 1.418–3.175), advanced clinical stage (OR 2.847, 95%CI 2.059–3.935), and present of metastasis (OR 2.630, 95%CI 1.583–4.371). For chemotherapy, dysregulated circRNAs suggest a better response (OR 0.443, 95%CI 0.231–0.849), but a higher probability of resistance (OR 9.343, 95%CI 5.352–16.309). For survival prognosis, dysregulated circRNAs were significantly correlated with poor OS (HR 2.437, 95%CI 2.224–2.670) and DFS (HR 2.125, 95%CI 1.621–2.786). The results did not show differences among subgroups. Higher circ_0002052 expression showed a relation with poor OS (HR 3.197, 95%CI 2.054–4.976). Conclusions Our review demonstrated that abnormally expressed circRNAs have a relation with advanced clinicopathologic features and better response, but a higher probability of resistance and poor survival prognosis in osteosarcoma patients. However, more studies are encouraged to provide more robust evidence to translate circRNAs into clinical practice. Trial registration PROSPERO ID: CRD42021235031
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».