Wild bird mass mortalities in eastern Canada associated with the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) virus, 2022
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<b>About this repository</b>This repository contains *data* and *code* associated with the following publication:<br><br>Avery-Gomm, S., Barychka, T., English, M., Ronconi, R., Wilhelm, S. I., Rail, J.-F., Cormier, T., Beaumont, M., Bowser, C., Burt, T. V., Collins, S., Duffy, S., Giacinti, J. A., Gilliland, S., Giroux, J.-F., Gjerdrum, C., Guillemette, M., Hargan, K. E., Jones, M., Kennedy, A., Kusalik, L., Lair, S., Lang, A., Lavoie, R., Lepage, C., McPhail, G., Montevecchi, W. A., Parsons, G. J., Provencher, J. F., Rahman, I., Robertson, G. J., Seyer, Y., Soos, C., Ward, C. R. E., Wells, R., & Wight, J. 2024. <b>Wild bird mass mortalities in eastern Canada associated with the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) virus</b>. <i>Ecosphere.</i><br><b>Abstract </b>In 2022, a severe outbreak of disease caused by clade 2.3.4.4b Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus resulted in unprecedented mortality among wild birds in eastern Canada. Tens of thousands of birds were reported sick or dead, prompting a comprehensive assessment of mortality spanning the breeding season between April 1 and September 30, 2022. Mortality reports were collated from federal, Indigenous, provincial, and municipal agencies, the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative and other non-governmental organizations, universities, and citizen science platforms. A scenario analysis was conducted to refine mortality estimates, accounting for potential double counts from multiple sources under a range of spatial and temporal overlaps. Correcting for double counting, HPAI is estimated to have caused 40,391 wild bird mortalities in eastern Canada during the spring and summer of 2022, however, this figure underestimates total mortality as it excludes unreported deaths on land and at sea. Seabirds and sea ducks, long-lived species that are slow to recover from perturbations, accounted for 98.7% of estimated mortalities. Our study provides estimates of bird mortality, with Northern Gannets<i> (Morus bassanus</i>; 25,669), Common Murres (<i>Uria aalge</i>; 8,133), and American Common Eiders (<i>Somateria mollissima dresseri;</i> 1,894) exhibiting the highest mortality figures. We then compare these mortality estimates with recent population estimates and trends and make an initial assessment of whether biologically meaningful population-level impacts are possible. Specifically, we focus on the Northern Gannet, a species that has suffered significant global mortality, and two harvested species, Common Murre and American Common Eider, to inform management decisions. Our analysis suggests population-level impacts in eastern Canada are possible for Northern Gannets and American Common Eiders but are unlikely for Common Murres. This study demonstrates a comprehensive approach to assessing mortality and underscores the urgent need for further research to understand the broader ecological ramifications of the HPAI outbreak on wild bird populations.<b>Data</b>This repository contains the complete collated dataset of reported wild bird mortalities in eastern Canada from<b>,</b> April 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022 with anonymized personal information. See the manuscript above for details. Metadata describing the data is provided in Sheet: Metadata. Instructions for how to use the dataset are provided in Instructions for DataS1.txt.<br>Data S1. Reported mortalities and morbidities in eastern Canada.xlsxInstructions for DataS1.txtThis repository also contains three .csv files with information on colony surveys from 2022 for Common Eiders (Data S2), Northern Gannets (Data S3) and Common Murres (Data S4). Also included in Data S2-4 are the best available information on recent breeding pair numbers and locations for all known colonies in eastern Canada, for each species, but this should not be construed or used as the official records on colony locations for Common Eiders or Common Mures.<br>Data S2. American Common Eider (ACOEI) colony survey information.xlsxData S3. Northern Gannet (NOGA) colony survey information.xlsxData S4. Common Murre (COMU) colony survey information.xlsx<b>Code</b>The code required to reproduce the double count analysis is in Scenario_Analysis.Rmd (input files are Data S1.csv and SpeciesAlphaCode_KEY.csv).<b>Software Requirements</b>Scripts are written for R version 4.2.2 (2022-10-31 ucrt). See scripts and the publication for packages and software citations.<b>Terms of use:</b>Anyone can share this material, provided it remains unaltered in any way, this is not done for commercial purposes, and the original authors are credited and cited (Attribution CC-BY-NC-ND).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,055 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».