Co-designing the implementation of a rural health systems-strengthening rheumatic heart disease program with remote First Nations Australian communities using Theory of Change
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is highly prevalent and under-detected in remote First Nations Australian communities. Rural communities face severe health workforce shortages that impact negatively on health outcomes. Task-sharing using local healthcare workers, trained to screen for active RHD cases (using handheld ultrasound with remote support from experts), has been proposed as a means of improving early detection whilst also strengthening referral pathways. Implementing new models of care within remote communities, however, requires local knowledge, cultural and operational adaptation, whilst ensuring consistency and quality assurance across multiple sites. This study aimed to co-design local implementation strategies for an RHD active case finding program with five remote communities and explain how and why the task-sharing program might lead to improved health outcomes. Methods A qualitative study using a Theory of Change approach and ‘yarning’ methods, was conducted with five remote First Nations Australian communities. We used a combination of participant observation, extensive field notes over sequential visits to each site, supplemented with document analysis to inform co-design of Theories of Change for each community. Data were curated using NVivo software and analysed using Powell’s refined compilation of implementation strategies framework. Results Through the co-design process, a total of 24 locally tailored implementation strategies were identified. All sites identified the need for a positive implementation environment, including recognition of local healthcare workers through positive messaging and celebratory events for achieving key training milestones. Other key themes included the importance of opportunistic RHD screening, and the integration of local languages during both training and screening. Five locally adapted versions of the Theory of Change were co-designed to include planned outcomes, assumptions, causal mechanisms, and indicators for the program at each community. Conclusions Our study identified implementation strategies and Theories of Change for the training and screening aspects of a new model of care for RHD screening in five remote First Nation Australian communities. These findings will be used to support future program evaluation and exploration the mechanisms by which the RHD screening program achieves its outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».