Household change at the food-energy-water nexus: expanding social behavioral science perspectives
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation contributes to social and behavioral science perspectives that push forward vital energy transitions in the face of climate change. In its three analytical chapters, this dissertation achieves three central objectives: 1) accumulates findings on household behavior at the food-energy-water nexus across disciplines, 2) identifies social behavioral drivers of household green technology purchase, and 3) expands the focus of consumption research beyond the individual to consider how household social dynamics shape food, energy, and water use in the home.Systematically reviewing published FEW intervention literature, Chapter 2 proposes a typology that characterizes household food, energy, and water conservation interventions as active, passive, or structural, and household-specific or non-specific, illustrating six distinct categories: information, tailored information, action, gamification, policy/price change, and material/technological provision. The review reveals four lessons for future intervention research: household non-specific information and tailored information appear to be more effective when used together, the impacts of feedback are reinforced when contact with participants is persistent, price-based interventions are often ineffective, and material/technology provision has proven very effective in a limited number of studies.Chapter 3 explores social and psychological determinants of green purchasing behavior in the US and Canada, motivated by the importance of efficient technology adoption to reach national emissions goals. This analysis establishes a causal chain from values to environmental concern to green lifestyle orientation, or the perception of importance of environmental action to one’s overall lifestyle, which predicts green purchase intentions for lightbulbs, appliances, and vehicles. Income also impacts purchase intentions in both US and Canadian samples, illustrating the pervasiveness of consumer lock-in that has potential to significantly slow green technology adoption. These findings stress the importance of exploring pro-environmental behavior not in isolation, but as interconnected with broader lifestyle circumstances. Chapter 4 tests the effects of various household social dynamics on a variety of pro-environmental actions, in response to a “unit of analysis” problem, where intervention research often targets individuals despite much resource consumption happening in the context of multi-person households. Multiple linear regression models demonstrate that positive household dynamics, including enhancing and norming behaviors, predict variance in pro-environmental actions in the household. In addition, individual and household levels of environmental awareness predict variance in both positive and negative household social dynamics. These results support qualitative research efforts that emphasize the importance of household social dynamics to resource consumption, providing avenues for future quantitative research to take a practice-based approach.Using multiple methods and drawing from a variety of theoretical bodies, this dissertation contributes to household behavior change literature that bridges disciplinary boundaries in the social sciences, providing paths forward for individual and household-level mitigation efforts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle