Dysphagia education in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: student self-competency ratings during their dysphagia course
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Purpose Training programs focused on dysphagia have been identified as an area needing improvement due to the specialized skills required to provide clinical care to patients with dysphagia. Globally, a lack of standardized training has been recognized and has led to the introduction of competency and training frameworks in the clinical practice of dysphagia. Previous studies have explored the experiences of students in training programs and their self-perceived competency; however, none have explored this in the Ethiopian context due to the infancy of the Speech Language Therapy (SLT) profession within this region. The objectives of this study were to explore patterns in self-perceived competency ratings for SLT students at AAU and determine the impact of clinical experiences during student training. Methods First- and second-year students enrolled in the two-year SLT Master's program in Ethiopia were taught the dysphagia course in a combined class in English by visiting faculty. A modified Dysphagia Competency Verification Tool (DCVT) was used to assess self-perception of competency in dysphagia. The tool was administered in April 2024, before any dysphagia-related clinical exposure occurred and once again in May 2024, after clinical exposure to patients with dysphagia occurred. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used for the General Skills (DCVT-GS) and Direct Patient Care (DCVT-DPC) subtests to study variations in responses for self-perceived competency. The models included covariates of sex, background in SLT, dysphagia-specific patient exposure and a repeated factor of survey timepoint. Results In total, 38 responses were collected across two time points and from all 19 participants. The SLT students were mostly female (n = 16; 84%) with ages ranging from 21 to 46 years. The GEE model for DCVT-GS identified significant main effects of background in SLT (p = 0.018), dysphagia patient exposure (p = 0.019), and survey timepoint (p < 0.001). The GEE model for DCVT-DPC demonstrated significance for background in SLT (p < 0.001), dysphagia patient exposure (p = 0.009), and sex (p = 0.031). Conclusion Regardless of DCVT domain, SLT graduate student clinicians were more likely to perceive themselves as “adequate” in their ratings at the second timepoint following clinical interactions, if they had prior SLT experience, including prior dysphagia experience. Training programs exploring dysphagia competency are encouraged to provide increased exposure to patients with dysphagia to support increased self-perceived competency scores.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».