Are managed honey bees (Apis mellifera) altering native pollinator diversity, or their interactions with plants in Western Canadian grasslands?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The grasslands region of southern Alberta, Canada, is dominated by agricultural activity, and approximately 75% of native grasslands have been lost to development. Honey bees (Apis mellifera) were introduced about a century ago, and today they are used to facilitate the pollination of crops; in one season, the region supports approximately 3.15 billion individuals. These super-generalists have been known in other places to compete with native pollinators, and may contribute to the decline of wild pollinator diversity and richness. Mounting evidence has also suggested that honey bees may alter the structure and function of plant-pollinator network interactions in a wild pollinator community, which may affect its resilience to perturbations and persistence into the future. This study examined the effects of honey bee abundance on native grassland pollinator communities by experimentally introducing honey bee hives to grasslands at the U. of A. Rangeland Research Institute’s Mattheis Research Ranch in southern Alberta, where pollinator abundance and diversity and plant-pollinator interactions over two summer seasons were sampled. Eighteen transects, at distances of 100 m, 500 m, and 5000 m from three clusters of honey bee hives, were established and floral insect visitors at each transect were sampled almost weekly. Flower species and flower visitors were then identified, and their interactions were compiled into plant-pollinator networks, from which species abundance, diversity, species composition, and network metrics related to network stability, structure, and resource use overlap, were analyzed. My findings indicate that honey bees did not affect wild pollinator abundance, richness, diversity, or species composition. Instead, flower species richness generally explained the variation in pollinator abundance, richness, and diversity. Additionally, honey bees impacted network structure by decreasing interaction evenness, and affected resource use overlap by increasing plant and pollinator functional complementarity. However, these network structural changes were due mostly to the added honey bee-plant interactions, and not to honey bees causing changes in how native pollinators interacted with plants. This study demonstrates that honey bees may not negatively impact native plant-pollinator communities in all contexts, and that, despite influencing interaction network structure and floral resource use, they may not affect the diversity of wild insect pollinators or their interactions with plants. Although caution should be used in generalizing these results in other regions, evidence suggests that honey bees are not a major threat to the wild pollinators in this area, at least in regard to changes to their diversity or interactions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».