MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6959211883 · doi:10.7939/r3-j4qv-jc88

Co-Composing Knowledge Communities and Curricula: A Narrative Inquiry into Student Teachers’ and a Teacher Educator’s Experiences

2022· dissertation· en· W6959211883 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumNarrativeCommunity of practiceNarrative inquiryTeacher educationIdentity (music)Professional developmentChina

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

What is knowledge? Whose knowledge matters? How can we build connections with people, share knowledge, and promote one another’s growth? These and many other wonders were embedded in my tension-filled stories about knowledge, curricula, and communities, both as a university teacher of English in China and as an international graduate student in Canada. As my doctoral study unfolded, I gradually realized that a pervasive practice of received knowledge shaped my tension-filled stories where I, students, and teachers were viewed or viewed ourselves as received knowers. Knowledge seemed to be delivered to teachers and later to students. The practice of received knowledge stripped away students’ and teachers’ identities as knowledge holders and curriculum makers. I also grew to see that teacher educators and student teachers were co-composing knowledge communities while co-composing curricula, where individuals’ identities as knowledge holders and makers were acknowledged. I wondered how their experiences of co-composing knowledge communities and curricula might shape student teachers’ future experiences of co-composing curricula with children. In this study, I came alongside Sam, Lara, and Maryam, two student teachers and one teacher educator, to co-inquire into our experiences of co-composing knowledge communities and curricula, building relational, reciprocal, and ethical learning spaces. We co-inquired into: How did we attend to one another’s ways of knowing in this process? How did we promote one another’s growth and development through curriculum making? How did our intercultural perspectives and experiences direct us to tell and retell our stories of these experiences, and how might doing so shape the professional knowledge landscapes of teacher education? This study was grounded in the conceptualizations of knowledge communities (Craig, 1995, 2001a, 2007, 2013) and curriculum making (Connelly & Clandinin, 1988; Huber et al., 2011) that value teachers’ and children’s identities as knowledge holders and curriculum makers. I resonated with the understanding underlying these conceptualizations, that is, knowledge is the sum total of the knower’s experience (Connelly & Clandinin, 1988; Dewey, 1938; Huber et al., 2011) and individuals hold personal practical knowledge (Clandinin, 1985; Connelly & Clandinin, 1988). I engaged in a relational narrative inquiry with Maryam, Lara, and Sam for one and a half years. I came alongside the three co-researchers in multiple places, such as in their in-person classroom, online classroom, online meetings, on campus, and at Maryam’s home. I participated in their course weekly and wrote field notes of my experience. We had one-on-one research conversations. I kept a research journal, our email messages, and copies of documents, photos, and artifacts they shared with me. Thinking narratively with the stories they lived, told, and retold in our relational three-dimensional narrative inquiry spaces attentive to temporality, sociality, and place, I composed their narrative accounts to foreground their knowledge and voices. Three resonant threads became visible across their narrative accounts, which deepened and made more complex the personal, practical, social, and theoretical justifications of this study. I invited Maryam, Lara, and Sam to read their narrative accounts, the resonant threads chapter, and the chapter on returning to the study justifications and imagining forward, to ensure they felt resonance. Making visible the resonant threads alongside the study justifications, I invited readers to rethink and reimagine practices in the landscapes of teacher education, curriculum making, and intercultural communities. The three resonant threads across Sam’s, Lara’s, and Maryam’s narrative accounts are: “Building Ethical, Reciprocal, and Relational Learning Spaces,” “Inquiring into Tensions and Differing Ways of Knowing,” and “Becoming The Best-Loved Self.” Two study justifications for future inquiry that emerged from our inquiry are: “Shaping Pre-Service Teacher Education and Curriculum Making With Children” and “Co-Composing Intercultural Knowledge Communities for Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Decolonization (EDID).” Through this narrative inquiry, I participated in conversations about pre-service teacher education, curriculum making, and intercultural knowledge communities. I joined conversations about legitimizing personal knowledge and nurturing children’s and our identities as knowledge holders, creators, contributors, and change makers. Keywords: knowledge communities, curriculum making, student teachers, teacher educators, narrative inquiry

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,109
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesTravaux en français237 207