MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6959387795 · doi:10.7939/r3-sjnb-pe32

Reclaiming Early Ethnography Through Contemporary Inuit Cultural Production

2020· dissertation· en· W6959387795 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthnographyIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)Knowledge productionTraditional knowledgeCultural knowledgeRelevance (law)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The dissertation is concerned with how Inuit artists are reclaiming knowledge from early ethnographic texts. Early ethnographic texts, such as the writing, photographs, and cultural products produced or acquired by Danish-Greenlandic explorer Knud Rasmussen during the Fifth Thule Expedition (1921-1924), helped shape dominant perceptions of Inuit and their communities. For example, Rasmussen was hired by the Government of Canada in 1925 to act as a consultant for Arctic policy. During his tenure, Rasmussen identified what he perceived to be a loss of traditional Inuit culture, but he also argued that cultural loss was necessary for Inuit to survive in “modern society” (Bown 284). Rasmussen’s arguments, which were prevalent in anthropological discourses throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, are reflected in the genre of “salvage ethnography,” or texts created by early ethnographers that sought to preserve Indigenous cultures under the false assumption of disappearance. These discourses continue to have significant relevance today, as Inuit representational organizations, such as Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), partner with the Government of Canada to develop documents like the Arctic Policy Framework, which will shape federal priorities in the North until 2030. The research is guided by two main questions: How is the knowledge contained in early ethnographic texts being reclaimed and mobilized in contemporary Inuit literature and film? And how can these artistic texts shape contemporary discourses about Inuit cultures, communities, and people? The dissertation aims to answer these questions through engagement with the primary texts, including: Mini Aodla Freeman’s Life Among the Qallunaat (1978/2015), Igloolik Isuma Productions’ The Journals of Knud Rasmussen (2006), and Aqqaluk Lynge’s Taqqat uummammut aqqutaannut takorluukkat apuuffiannut/The Veins of the Heart to the Pinnacle of the Mind (2008). Conventional literary analysis methods, such as close reading, are supported by interviews with the artists, and fieldwork in Nuuk, Greenland (January-May 2018) and Igloolik, Nunavut (July 2018). The dissertation advocates for a methodological shift in Indigenous literary studies that prioritizes consultation with artists, the importance of fostering relationships, and working outside the physical confines of texts. Drawing from Kim TallBear’s methodology of “standing with,” which credits specialists who are not conventionally regarded as scholars within the restrictive framework of the academy, but who are essential to scholarship (82), I advocate for centring the knowledge of artists due to their lived expertise within the field. However, shifting methods in literary studies towards a model that prioritizes the contributions of artists presents significant challenges, including additional pressures on artists’ labour and a lack of institutional support for both students and mentors. These methodological inquiries are developed via engagement with three major texts. The first chapter considers how the original 1978 publication of Aodla Freeman’s Life Among the Qallunaat was miscategorised as a form of reverse ethnography, while the 2015 edition maintains its initial memoir status. Using an interview with the author, a comparative reading between the two editions, and an analysis of the original typescript, I argue that Hurtig Publishers’ mischaracterization of the text made it more marketable to Southern audiences and facilitated a reverse ethnographic reading. The second chapter, concerning the Isuma film The Journals of Knud Rasmussen, draws from interviews with several crew members to examine how the creation of the community-produced film provided opportunities for re-teaching and re-learning cultural knowledge. Creators of the film drew from Rasmussen’s ethnographic material to facilitate these processes. Lastly, the third chapter uses Lynge’s text and an interview with the author to consider the potential of using relational methodologies for studying Greenlandic literature. As a Kalaaleq (Greenlandic) politician and author, Lynge engages with Rasmussen’s ethnographic work to challenge dominant narratives concerning the representation of early “exploration” in Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland), including the essential contributions of Arnarulunnguaq, the memorialization of these events, and the major concerns involved with representing Kalaallit Nunaat as a place that can be “explored.” The conclusion serves as a call to action for scholars in Indigenous literatures to use non-textual methods.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,944
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,111

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,036
Communication savante0,0170,011
Science ouverte0,0030,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetLegal and Regulatory AnalysisTravaux en français237 207