MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6959485142 · doi:10.7939/r3-sr29-dm68

The Effect of Snail-Associated Chaetogaster (Annelida: Naididae) on Host Behaviour and Fitness.

2023· dissertation· en· W6959485142 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSnailHost (biology)PopulationHabitatAbundance (ecology)PredationFreshwater snail

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Members of the genus Chaetogaster (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae) are small oligochaete worms found in freshwater habitats around the world. Most are free living predators or omnivores, but members of one species group are symbionts of molluscs, particularly snails. Despite being a common symbiotic association, little research has investigated the ecological aspects of this relationship. In particular, where the Chaetogaster-snail association falls on the mutualism-to-parasitism spectrum is still in question, especially since genetically distinct worm- host species pairings might result in different ecological relationships. The broad purpose of this thesis is to investigate the relationship between symbiotic Chaetogaster and host snails from the family Physidae in central Alberta, including how these worms affect snail fitness and behaviour, as well as the potential for Chaetogaster to play a role in host defence against trematode parasites. To address these aims, I conducted a comprehensive survey that explored the host associations and population dynamics of Chaetogaster in the field, and several manipulative laboratory experiments. Chapter 2 details my field-based research, conducting experiments and sampling in water bodies near Morinville and Fort Saskatchewan. My survey determined that abundance of Chaetogaster varies depending on season and snail host size. Sequencing of the ‘barcode’ region of the mitochondrial COI genes of hosts and worms revealed that the ponds surveyed each had two or more species of physid snail present, but only one species of Chaetogaster. My manipulative field experiments involved placing lab-reared Physella acuta snails in small cages in two ponds, half with Chaetogaster and half without. Unfortunately, due to destruction of field cages by wildlife and high mortality of experimental snails, the field experiments did not result in statistically useful data. A correlation analysis on data from field surveys indicated that there is no association between high numbers of external Chaetogaster and trematode metacercariae within snails, suggesting that Chaetogaster may not prevent metacercariae from infecting freshwater snails. Chapter 3 discusses two lab experiments regarding the effect of Chaetogaster colonization on physid fitness. In these experiments, one set of lab-bred Physella acuta were artificially colonized with worms and another set was not. The snails were individually monitored for 5 weeks. Using egg production as a proxy for host fitness, I found in both experiments that snails without Chaetogaster produced significantly more eggs than those with Chaetogaster over the five-week time frame. These results suggest that worm presence decreases host fitness. Chapter 4 includes two experiments examining the behaviour of snails with and without symbiont worms. In the first, I observed snails collected from the field with naturally varying Chaetogaster abundances to quantify the distance that each snail moved over the course of an hour. I found no difference in the movement behaviour of snails regardless of Chaetogaster number. In the second experiment, I exposed lab-bred Physella acuta to conspecifics with and without Chaetogaster to determine if Chaetogaster presence attracts or repels nearby snails, and whether attraction/repulsion is influenced by whether the focal snail itself was carrying Chaetogaster. I did not find a pattern of focal snails preferring or avoiding snails with symbionts, which could either indicate that the snails are indifferent to Chaetogaster or that they are unable to detect the chemical signature of the worms in the water. Although the results of my experiments cannot be used to definitively determine if Chaetogaster symbionts positively or negatively affect the snail species that I studied, for the lab-bred Physella acuta, they do suggest a general negative influence of symbiont worms on host snails. It may be that after generations of living in captivity without Chaetogaster, members of this population of P. acuta have become more sensitive to these worms than snails in wild populations. Future research, particularly into other worm-snail species pairs, will be necessary to further elucidate this complex relationship.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,142
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,775

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetParasite Biology and Host InteractionsTravaux en français237 207