The Effect of Snail-Associated Chaetogaster (Annelida: Naididae) on Host Behaviour and Fitness.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Members of the genus Chaetogaster (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae) are small oligochaete worms found in freshwater habitats around the world. Most are free living predators or omnivores, but members of one species group are symbionts of molluscs, particularly snails. Despite being a common symbiotic association, little research has investigated the ecological aspects of this relationship. In particular, where the Chaetogaster-snail association falls on the mutualism-to-parasitism spectrum is still in question, especially since genetically distinct worm- host species pairings might result in different ecological relationships. The broad purpose of this thesis is to investigate the relationship between symbiotic Chaetogaster and host snails from the family Physidae in central Alberta, including how these worms affect snail fitness and behaviour, as well as the potential for Chaetogaster to play a role in host defence against trematode parasites. To address these aims, I conducted a comprehensive survey that explored the host associations and population dynamics of Chaetogaster in the field, and several manipulative laboratory experiments. Chapter 2 details my field-based research, conducting experiments and sampling in water bodies near Morinville and Fort Saskatchewan. My survey determined that abundance of Chaetogaster varies depending on season and snail host size. Sequencing of the ‘barcode’ region of the mitochondrial COI genes of hosts and worms revealed that the ponds surveyed each had two or more species of physid snail present, but only one species of Chaetogaster. My manipulative field experiments involved placing lab-reared Physella acuta snails in small cages in two ponds, half with Chaetogaster and half without. Unfortunately, due to destruction of field cages by wildlife and high mortality of experimental snails, the field experiments did not result in statistically useful data. A correlation analysis on data from field surveys indicated that there is no association between high numbers of external Chaetogaster and trematode metacercariae within snails, suggesting that Chaetogaster may not prevent metacercariae from infecting freshwater snails. Chapter 3 discusses two lab experiments regarding the effect of Chaetogaster colonization on physid fitness. In these experiments, one set of lab-bred Physella acuta were artificially colonized with worms and another set was not. The snails were individually monitored for 5 weeks. Using egg production as a proxy for host fitness, I found in both experiments that snails without Chaetogaster produced significantly more eggs than those with Chaetogaster over the five-week time frame. These results suggest that worm presence decreases host fitness. Chapter 4 includes two experiments examining the behaviour of snails with and without symbiont worms. In the first, I observed snails collected from the field with naturally varying Chaetogaster abundances to quantify the distance that each snail moved over the course of an hour. I found no difference in the movement behaviour of snails regardless of Chaetogaster number. In the second experiment, I exposed lab-bred Physella acuta to conspecifics with and without Chaetogaster to determine if Chaetogaster presence attracts or repels nearby snails, and whether attraction/repulsion is influenced by whether the focal snail itself was carrying Chaetogaster. I did not find a pattern of focal snails preferring or avoiding snails with symbionts, which could either indicate that the snails are indifferent to Chaetogaster or that they are unable to detect the chemical signature of the worms in the water. Although the results of my experiments cannot be used to definitively determine if Chaetogaster symbionts positively or negatively affect the snail species that I studied, for the lab-bred Physella acuta, they do suggest a general negative influence of symbiont worms on host snails. It may be that after generations of living in captivity without Chaetogaster, members of this population of P. acuta have become more sensitive to these worms than snails in wild populations. Future research, particularly into other worm-snail species pairs, will be necessary to further elucidate this complex relationship.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».