Recreational Marijuana Legalization Related Concerns and Perception in South Asian Immigrant Communities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
South Asian immigrants comprise approximately 25% of Canada’s immigrant population, however, due to minimal efforts taken to initiate consultation on the preparedness and concerns regarding marijuana legalization within the South Asian community, the current knowledge gap has facilitated the acquisition and spread of misinformation in respect to marijuana use. Levels of unawareness were investigated through the use of a 25 question structured survey with two optional written response sections, and a total of 300 surveys were distributed in the first phase of the research investigation. Participant eligibility was assessed on the basis of (1) being over the age of 18, and (2) first generation immigrant and of South Asian ethnicity. 57% of respondents were males, and 43% were female. 31.5% of participants were between the ages of 36-45, constituting the most common age group for this study. Our survey results indicated that lack of awareness pertaining to the legalization of marijuana was influenced heavily by gender, level of education, and ethnicity. 88.2% of respondents stated that they were unaware of any community led initiatives set in place to educate either youth or adults on the effects of recreational marijuana use, along with the details of the current recreational marijuana legislation. When assessing levels of unawareness, it was found that 23% of males and 35.71% of females were unaware of either the legalization of recreational marijuana or the details within the legislation. It was also found that lower levels of education correlated positively with lower levels of awareness in respect to recreational marijuana legalization, with 36.36% of individuals without a high school certification indicating that they were unaware of the legalization of recreational marijuana and/or the details within the legislation, the highest of any group. Levels of unawareness in regards to either the legalization of recreational marijuana and the details within the legislation were found to be alarmingly high in the South Asian community. Moreover, females and individuals without high-school and post-secondary education were more likely than males and individuals with either bachelor or professional degrees to report unawareness. It was also found that little to no efforts have been taken by community organizations to promote knowledge dissemination and mobilization within the South Asian immigrant population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».