MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6959548531 · doi:10.11575/prism/48079

Disease control practices used to prevent morbidity and mortality in preweaned beef calves

2025· other· en· W6959548531 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHerdColostrumIce calvingOutbreakDiseaseOddsPandemicNeonatal mortalityUdder

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Calf morbidity and mortality negatively impact economic returns for cow-calf producers. Given this, preventing infectious diseases, including Neonatal Calf Diarrhea (NCD) and Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) is essential. However, recommended practices to attain this have not been recently summarized or updated. Therefore, the aim of this thesis was to study several aspects relevant to the implementation of disease control and update recommended practices. The objectives were to: i. summarize the scientific evidence on the effectiveness of practices in preventing health and mortality outcomes, ii. prioritize practices based on their usefulness in herds considering their effectiveness, ease of implementation, and economic feasibility, iii. assess the frequency of outbreaks, use of practices, the impact of practices on outbreaks across Canadian cow-calf herds, and the importance given to productivity parameters across regions, and iv. compile the evidence into a Calf Health Decision Tool to support discussions between producers and veterinarians and pilot it in Alberta, Canada. The work reported in Chapter 2 showed that the evidence of the impact of practices on mortality, regardless of the cause, was scarce. Only a few practices showed statistically significant associations. Herds that routinely intervened with colostrum or checked the fullness of the udder had a lower mortality risk than those not using these practices. Herds that calved early or during winter had a higher mortality risk than those calving later. Herds with longer calving seasons had a higher mortality risk than those with shorter seasons. Calves from herds that did not supplement with vitamin E and selenium at birth had higher odds of mortality than those from herds where this practice was used. Chapter 3 showed that most practices impacted both NCD and BRD. However, the evidence was of low and very low certainty. Chapter 4 found that veterinarians prioritized the effectiveness of a practice over its ease of implementation and economic feasibility. Vaccinating calves against clostridial disease and providing colostrum in case a calf had not nursed using an oesophageal tube or nipple bottle were practices considered always useful for all herds. Most practices were shown to have intermediate levels of usefulness in herds. Prophylactic and metaphylactic use of antibiotics were considered among the least useful. Yet, all practices that were considered at least very useful for some herds were deemed relevant enough to be included in a Calf Health Decision Tool. Chapter 5 found that over 40% of herds had at least one type of outbreak during the last three calving seasons. Also, it was demonstrated that eastern and western herds managed their cow-calf herds differently. Some frequently used practices were shown to increase the odds of having outbreaks. It was also found that western and eastern producers gave similar importance to several productivity parameters of their herds. In Chapter 5, it was revealed that the Tool was useful for facilitating discussions between producers and veterinarians regarding disease control. Responses showed that delaying the calving season for early calving herds was not feasible. Most herds could only follow only one of two recommended practices, either calving heifers before cows or calving seasons shorter than 80 days. Therefore, there might be an incompatibility between these recommendations. Most producers were willing to consider using some method to segregate calves by age. Given this, this could become a more widespread recommended practice. Only half of the herds vaccinated dams against NCD, and even one herd with a history of NCD outbreaks was not doing this. This may be because producers felt reluctant to manage pregnant dams in the chute. However, they were more willing to consider calf vaccination instead. The findings presented in this thesis reveal a general lack of consistent evidence proving the effectiveness, ease of implementation, and economic feasibility of practices. Overall, the work in this thesis showed that many commonly used practices make herds vulnerable to outbreaks, and thus, tailoring disease control practices to the operation is essential. Therefore, The Calf Health Decision Tool created may help support discussions between veterinarians and producers to implement this and prevent disease and mortality.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,220
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,437

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MIND→Même sujetWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→Travaux en français237 207→