Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS) plans, coordinates, and implements demersal trawl surveys and hydroacoustic surveys in the Baltic Sea including the Baltic International Acoustic Survey (BIAS), the Baltic Acoustic Spring Survey (BASS), and the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS) in the 1st and 4th quarter on an annual basis. The group compiles results from these surveys and provides the herring, sprat, cod and flatfish abundance indices for the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS) to use as tuning fleets.In 2025, WGBIFS completed the following tasks: (1) compiled survey results from 2024 and the first quarter of 2025; (2) planned and coordinated all surveys for the second half of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, relevant to the assessments of the Baltic fish stocks. Data collected during the recent BITS surveys was added to the ICES Database of Trawl Surveys (DATRAS). Also, the Tow-Database was corrected and updated accordingly. The Access-databases for aggregated acoustic data and the ICES database of acoustic-trawl surveys for disaggregated data were updated. All countries registered collected litter materials to DATRAS.The area coverage and the number of control hauls in the BASS, BIAS and GRAHS in 2024 were considered to be appropriate to the calculation of tuning indices and the data can be used for the assessment of Baltic herring and sprat stocks. The number of valid hauls accomplished during the 4th quarter 2024 and 1st quarter 2025 BITS were considered by the group as appropriate to tuning series and the data can be used for the assessment of Baltic and Kattegat cod and flatfish stocks.BIAS survey standard deviation for Central Baltic herring acoustic index was calculated To improve transparency and reproducibility, WGBIFS has launched a multi-year initiative to review acoustic methodologies and scrutinization practices, laying the groundwork for even further TAF improvements, as well as enhanced reproducibility and consistency.Issues related to the data quality of demersal trawl surveys were discussed. The group agreed on conducting several experiments in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 BITS, including a reduction of hauling time, changes in stomach sampling, sampling of Benthic fauna and adjustments in the haul allocations.Information on how different countries are handling the closed areas (offshore wind power plants and marine protected areas), that are restricted for scientific vessels to conduct the surveys, was gathered. The group agreed to feedback in a more standardized way using feedback sheets for the upcoming BITS.Survey manuals were reviewed, resulting in a number of implemented revisions and clarifications.Inquiries from other ICES expert groups were discussed and addressed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».