MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6962746460 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/uby45

Real time location system techonolgy and older adults with cognitive impairment

2021· other· en· W6962746460 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen Science Framework · 2021
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDementiaCognitive impairmentCognitionActivities of daily livingStaffingMemory impairmentCognitive declineIndependent living

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Older adults are at high risk of cognitive impairment, with almost half of people over 80 years of age presenting with some degree of cognitive impairment (Edwards, 2003). Cognitive impairment within the older adult population is often attributable to dementia. Dementia is an irreversible slow and progressive decline of cognition, characterized by memory loss, impairment in judgement, and difficulty in conducting activities of daily functioning (Downing, Caprio, & Lyness, 2013; Edwards, 2003). As those with dementia require increasing support for daily functioning, many relocate into an assisted living environment. The umbrella term 'residential care' is often used to reflect a continuum of assisted living environments which are designed to facilitate and support an older adult's functional independence. Retirement homes typically foster independent living for those with mild to no cognitive impairment. Long-term care homes provide more intensive staffing support for those with moderate cognitive impairment or chronic illnesses unable to care for themselves. Lastly, in-hospital special care units are often utilized to stabilize those with severe cognitive impairment and behavioural manifestations. Within Canada, approximately 87% of those living within a residential care setting have dementia or cognitive impairment (Canadian Institutes of Health Research). As most of these residential care settings have limited staff to resident ratio, utilization of technology may prove to be an essential solution to alleviate resource gaps and augment care delivery. Lorenz, Freddolino, Comas-Herrara, Knapp, and Damant (2019) categorized seven technology functions in use for those with cognitive impairment: memory support, treatment, safety and security, training, care delivery, social interaction, and others. Technology has been most used at enhancing safety and security for those with cognitive impairment and living within the community (e.g., motion sensors, alarms, fall detectors). A systematic review conducted by Lynn et al. (2019) identified the technologies that are being used within long-term residential care settings. The technology categories included: telecare, light therapy, robotics (e.g., robotic companion), well-being and leisure (e.g., touch screen devices, watches to measure sleep cycles), simulated presence and orientation (e.g., audio/video recordings), and activities of daily living (e.g. handwashing, taking medication memory aids). There have been several reviews of evidence on the use of different technologies in the older adult population to measure a number of variables, such as detection of agitation and aggression (Khan, Ye, Taati, & Mihailidis, 2018), monitoring of treatment response of people with dementia (Husebo et al., 2019), prediction of falls risk (Dolatabadi, Van Ooteghem, Taati, & Iaboni, 2018), gait analysis of people with dementia (Iersel, Hoefsloot, Munneke, Bloem, & Olde Rikkert, 2004), and physical activity levels (Taraldsen, Chastin, Riphagen, Vereijken, & Helbostad, 2011). Although specific to the older adult, these reviews were not exclusive to those with cognitive impairment nor residential care settings, making the findings from the reviews challenging to apply to this sub-population of older adults. One technology not well studied in the older adult population is real-time locating systems (RTLS). RTLS is an indoor positioning system which has been used across hospital and residential care home settings (Akl, Taati, & Mihailidis, 2015; M.E. Bowen, Crenshaw, & Stanhope, 2018; Jansen, Diegelmann, Schnabel, & Hauer, 2017). RTLS can provide a vast amount of data on an individual's movements in location and time. RTLS consists of a software application and reference points that detect and synthesize positioning data from wireless transmitters worn by people or attached to objects. Healthcare providers can use the data obtained from the transmitters to help understand patterns of human movement and behaviour. There is a vast potential to use the RTLS health indices data to augment both healthcare decisions and measure clinical outcomes. There has been a rising interest in the use of RTLS in long-term care settings. Preliminary research has shown that clinically meaningful information can be extracted from this data – for example, detection of agitation (Bankole et al., 2012) and monitoring wandering behaviours (Mary Elizabeth Bowen & Rowe, 2019). To date, there has not been a review identifying how RTLS data is being used for the care of older adults with cognitive impairment living in a residential care setting. Purpose A review of the clinical applications of RTLS technology in older adults with cognitive impairment who live in a residential care environment is required, with the ultimate goal of identifying any evidence-based or clinically validated uses for the technology. As such, the review will aim to answer the following questions: 1. For older adults with cognitive impairment residing in a residential care setting, how are data from RTLS technologies being used? 2. In what ways have RTLS data been used to develop or validate health measures for the clinical care of people with cognitive impairment in residential care settings? See attachment for the full study protocol.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,853
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0030,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen Science FrameworkMême sujetContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTravaux en français237 207