Immunity to mononormativity: Negativity bias towards polyamory - the MAP Study
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An explicit negativity bias in the form of stigmatisation and pathologisation of people in consensual non-monogamous relationships has been observed both in the general population and among psychotherapists ( Barker, 2011; Burgleigh et al., 2017; Grunt-Meyer et al., 2019; Hutzler et al., 2017; Knapp, 1997). However, there is currently little research that specifically relates to polyamory: this is also mainly located in the Polish, Canadian and American areas. Due to an increasing demand for competent psychotherapists for the polyamorous population group (McCoy, 2013), as well as the prevailing professional and social prejudices about the nature of CNM relationships (Duplassie, 2015), further research seems to be relevant. Not only research on the explicit attitudes towards polyamory mentioned above is a key component to effecting change in the social order and/or stigma, but research on implicit attitudes is also essential. In this area, only three studies appear to have addressed implicit attitudes towards CNM relationships (Kenyon et al., 2018; Thomson et al., 2018; Thomson et al., 2020). However, researchers in the field of social cognition specifically recommend the use of implicit measurements to avoid confounding with socially desirable responses in the response behaviour (Dunham et al., 2006). This study aims to narrow the research gap regarding polyamory by not focusing on all CNM relationships, but rather by specifically focusing on polyamory. Secondly, in addition to explicit measures, implicit measurements will also be applied to expand the research area of valid studies with less socially desirable response behaviour in the area of CNM relationships to polyamory. Thirdly, it will be examined whether increased empathy is associated with a reduced negative attitude towards polyamorous individuals. Finally, we will examine whether there is a group difference between psychotherapists and the general population regarding attitudes towards polyamory. It is expected that psychotherapists will show a lower implicit preference for monogamy than the general population. Both the general population and psychotherapists often identify with social norms, such as mononormativity. However, it can be assumed that psychotherapists, in addition to a possible identification with traditional social norms, have a further basis for identification with their professional, occupational values. This professional basis for identification is based on an open, non-judgmental attitude, reflecting on one's own prejudices, as well as the ethical values of the profession (Pomerantz et al., 1998).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,018 | 0,015 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,102 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle