Local Vancouver Island tourism (LOVIT) participation and its relationship to quality of life: an exploratory thesis research project
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This timely and relevant research project was an exploratory study of local Vancouver Island tourism participation and its relationship to quality of life for Vancouver Island residents. Examining sustainable leisure management from the perspective of how residents utilize and enjoy products and services deemed for tourists creates the opportunity for an enhanced understanding of the tourism industry on Vancouver Island. Linking that understanding to the study of quality of life for residents provides a more collaborative and innovative approach to how stakeholders can develop and market tourism to the benefit of the people that live, work, and play on Vancouver Island. The qualitative data was collected through six semi-structured interviews with tourism industry stakeholders and one focus group of females in each of four separate communities across Vancouver Island during the summer of 2012. The richness of the information gathered formed the basis of a knowledge mobilization plan aimed at empowering residents to engage in truly sustainable tourism on the island they call home. This research was one of the first of its kind undertaken on Vancouver Island and the responses were both thoughtful and candid. Industry stakeholders and focus group participants were eager and appreciative of their inclusion in a discussion on local tourism and quality of life, as many had never been asked their opinions on this particular topic. Representing the supply side of tourism, industry stakeholders provided insight on the need to bring residents into conversations surrounding tourism. Focus group participants provided valuable information surrounding local tourism and quality of life from the demand perspective. The term local tourism has yet to be clearly defined within the literature so through the collection and analysis of the data from this study, a definition has been created. Local tourism is tourism activity within the context of one’s local community and is defined by the people within that community. Four local Vancouver Island tourism themes emerged from the analysis of data collected: people, emotions, activities, and places and spaces. When studying quality of life, the sense of space and pride of place the study participants have for the island is both embedded and explicit in their responses. When local tourism and quality of life were looked at together, the connection to place is overarching and is one of the key findings for the sustainability of simple, affordable, accessible local Vancouver Island tourism (LOVIT).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».