Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement was developed through two primary processes: 1. An ICC-developed synthesis1 report of Inuit-produced materials and voices that address existing rules, laws, values, guidelines and protocols for the engagement of Inuit communities and Indigenous Knowledge, and 2. A series of workshops convening Inuit Delegates that captured Inuit knowledge, perspectives, needs, priorities and guidance on future engagement processes.2 Additionally, this work has been informed through decades of Inuit input to governments, international fora, negotiations, and ICC-led workshops, meetings, discussions, conferences, and projects occurring across communities, regionally, nationally and internationally. Our people from across Inuit Nunaat have reviewed the protocols. They have been agreed upon by the ICC Executive Council and formally approved. The world community is increasingly responsive to and respectful of the rights of Indigenous Peoples. However, for decades the interest in and research regarding the Arctic “cryosphere” has emerged without a full understanding of Inuit Nunaat -- our traditional homelands and territory, which includes Inuit, our way of life and our knowledge. Yet, through our persistence and our work as an Indigenous Peoples’ Organization, we are moving away from an approach that dismisses our Indigenous Knowledge and our way of living and closer to conditions that respect and recognize our distinct status, rights and role in the Arctic. The Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement are intended by ICC as a pathway for others to understand this essential dynamic. Today we maintain that the “intricate knowledge” that our founder Eben Hopson invoked in 1977 is necessary for understanding the transformations that the Arctic region and indeed the world is facing. Knowledge and the co-production of knowledge consistent with Inuit perspectives, values, rights and protocols will result in a more genuine collective effort to create greater understanding about Inuit Nunaat, about the Arctic. Co-production of knowledge with Indigenous Peoples across the globe is gaining a foothold, bit by bit. Triggered to a substantial degree, by our input as well as our political and intellectual force, we are seeing evidence of this dynamic in various contexts ranging from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to the Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean to the Food and Agriculture Organization to the Arctic Council. This document should be accepted and seen by others as an invitation to consult and cooperate with Inuit by illustrating for researchers, decision-makers and others what is needed to genuinely be responsive to the urgent call for recognizing the interrelated, interdependent and indivisible rights of Inuit. The elements embraced in this publication can be employed by others in any facet of engagement with Inuit and the diverse subject matter that affects our day to day lives. We especially invite scientists, researchers, funders, and decision-makers to digest and ultimately implement these protocols with Inuit. Finally, we insist in a good way that overall results will produce a higher standard and quality of research beneficial for Inuit and all others.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».