Implementing An interdisciplinary Concussion Clinic : Application of Best Practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Concussion/Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with many survivors dealing with persisting difficulties for years post-injury. One Canadian study examining both hospital-treated cases as well as those presenting to a family physician calculated the incidence of mTBI in Ontario to lie between 493 and 653/100,000 (Rhy, 2009). Approximately 66% of patients with mild concussion will recover in approximately 2-4 weeks with follow up from their GP or primary care giver. About 33% will experience more persistent symptoms requiring further assessment and support. Of that group, another 50% of may experience persisting symptoms beyond 3 months. The consequences for these individuals may include physical, cognitive, emotional and behavioural symptoms resulting in reduced functional ability, heightened emotional distress, and delayed return to work or school. These patients require more specialized management to assist in the returning to their pre injury activities. Intervention: Due to an identified gap in service in the South Central Ontario region, a comprehensive, interdisciplinary outpatient clinic was established for the assessment, diagnosis and treatment (including disposition to the appropriate follow-up resource), of patients with mild head injury/concussion. The features of the clinic and the model of care are consistent with the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF) Standards of Post-Concussion Care (2017). The interdisciplinary care model is unique in that assessments are done collaboratively, leveraging the specific expertise of each discipline (neurology, physiatry, neuropsychology, nursing and others) in making an accurate diagnosis and determining a plan of care. Further, because this clinic is located at a regional center, consultations/referrals to neurosurgeons and trauma specialists are more easily facilitated when needed. Outcomes: Currently, the clinic operates 1 day/week. In the first 4 months of operation, 288 referrals have been received with approximately 16-20 patients seen daily. Wait time to be seen post injury has been reduced from several weeks to 3-5 days. Expected patient outcomes include: shorter/more effective recovery, hospital avoidance, less long term symptoms/sequelae, quicker reintegration into the community, less lost time at work; increased productivity. Health system outcomes include: decreased demand on ED and other acute care resources, increased skill capacity in the community as follow-up teaching and referral is completed, improved utilization of existing community resources to support patients in their recovery journey.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,067 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».