MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6964555749 · doi:10.25959/23246681

Predictors of falls in middle-aged women

2022· dissertation· en· W6964555749 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Tasmania · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCohortTest (biology)Prospective cohort studyIntervention (counseling)Injury preventionPoison controlFalling (accident)Fall preventionCohort studySuicide prevention

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<b>Introduction</b>Falls are a major public health issue worldwide. Although falls occur at a high rate in middle-aged adults, limited evidence is available to inform falls prevention strategies for this population. Because a previous fall is one of the strongest risk factors for future falling, early intervention to prevent falls in midlife could have benefits for the prevention of both short-term injury and long-term falls in later life. Nonetheless, the incidence of and risk factors for falls in middle-aged adults are poorly studied. To address these gaps of knowledge, this thesis investigated the incidence, circumstances, and risk factors for falls in a cohort of middle-aged women.<b>Methods</b>This was a 5-year prospective cohort study among 347 middle-aged women aged 41-62 years. The study sample came from 470 women who originally participated in a 2-year randomised controlled trial (RCT) of osteoporosis education intervention in 2000. These were randomly selected from the Tasmania electoral roll. The baseline of the current study comes from a 2011-2012 follow-up of 347 (74%) of the RCT's participants. In 2017-2019, these 347 women were invited to participate in a further 5-year follow-up. At baseline and the 5-year follow-up, we measured age, height, weight, smoking status, hours of employment, marital status, education level, menopausal status, leg muscle strength (LMS), balance (timed up and go test [TUG], step test [ST], functional reach test [FRT], and lateral reach test [LRT]), and time spent sedentary and in light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Also measured at the 5-year follow-up were: history of falls (HOF), fear of falling (FOF), sun exposure, cognition measured by the Montreal cognitive assessment and Trail making test, medical history (high blood pressure, memory decline, faintness/dizziness, major surgery, arthritis, feet pain, stress incontinence, urge incontinence) and medication use (antihypertension, antidepressants, statins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)). The incidence of falls and injurious falls, and circumstances of falls were recorded monthly for one year by questionnaire at the 5-year follow-up.<b>Results</b>In this sample of middle-aged women:The incidence of any, multiple and injurious falls was high (42%, 17%, and 24%, of women sustained at least one of each type of fall, respectively). Most falls occurred outdoors and were mainly caused by tripping and slipping.Neither baseline nor 5-year change in LMS and balance measures were associated with the risk of any falls, multiple falls, or injurious falls five years later.Baseline MVPA was beneficially associated with baseline LMS and TUG but not their change over five years. Higher baseline MVPA was not associated with FRT at baseline but associated with a greater decrease in FRT. Increased MVPA over 5 years was associated with less deterioration in FRT while increased sedentary time over 5 years was associated with a larger decrease. There were no associations between MVPA or sedentary time and falls, but higher baseline light physical activity (LPA) was associated with higher falls risk.Multiple intrinsic risk factors were identified for falls. HOF, higher education attainment, faintness/dizziness, urinary stress incontinence, use of statin or NSAIDs, more time spent in MVPA, wearing bifocal glasses, and worse cognitive function were associated with an increased risk of falls and/or injurious in middle-aged women. Being employed and a history of head injury were associated with a decreased risk of falls and/or injurious in middle-aged women. In addition, there was a significant interaction between HOF and FOF (P=0.035); FOF was associated with increased falls among women with HOF, but decreased falls among those without HOF.<b>Conclusion</b>This thesis highlights the high incidence of falls in middle-aged women, suggesting falls are a major issue in this population. However, while there are similarities in the risk factors for falls in middle-aged and older women, such as HOF and urinary incontinence, there are also major differences. For example, LMS, balance and head injury had no or an opposite association with falls in middle-aged women compared to older adults. Middle-aged women, particularly with a history of fall and fear of falling, could be a target group for falls prevention strategies. Future studies should develop a multifactorial approach to prevent falls in middle-aged women that may differ from existing strategies in older adults.<br>

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,405
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of TasmaniaMême sujetBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionTravaux en français237 207