The Gapps Study Gender and Advanced Physiotherapist Practitioner Satisfaction in Pediatric Rheumatology Opinions of Parents and Teens
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives In Canada, Advanced Physiotherapist Practitioners (APP) manage complex rheumatic disease cases in shared care models.[1] The APP role has been studied in adult rheumatology, with little focus on pediatrics or how this role impacts gender.[1] Rheumatic diseases disproportionately affect women with this disparity evident in children, however research is not often tailored to investigate impacts of care based on gender.[2] In a Canadian pediatric rheumatology center with an APP shared care model, we aimed to i) measure and describe parent and patient satisfaction and ii) explore differences between patient and parent responses based on gender. Methods This mixed-methods, cross-sectional study included all parents and patients 12-17 years seen by 1 APP at McMaster Children’s Hospital (June-August 2024). Each family was a unique case with multiple responses (patient and/or parent(s)). Patient and parent demographics were collected. We used an adapted 9-item Visit-Specific Questionnaire (VSQ) with each response reported by 5-point Likert scale (scores transposed to 100) and open-ended questions. Continuous variables were reported using means and 95% confidence intervals, categorical variables using frequencies and proportions. Qualitative responses were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results Of 43 unique cases, (16 new consults, 27 follow-ups); 44% (n=19) were not rheumatic and 30% (n=13) had juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Of parents (n=50), 64% (n=32) were female, 50% (n=25) and were 41-50 years. Of 16 patients, 69% (n=11) were female and 69% (n=11) were Caucasian. Regardless of gender, both patients and parents reported lower satisfaction for wait time (VSQ1) and discussing arthritis management (VSQ6) (Figure 1). Parents reported >90% satisfaction for explanation of results, technical skills, personal manner and the visit overall (VSQ4,7,8,9). While patients reported >80% satisfaction for personal manner (VSQ8) and >75% for answering questions (VSQ3). Female patients and female parents total VSQ score was 72.2(60.6-84.8); 90.6(86.6-94.7) respectively. Themes that emerged from open-ended questions included: thorough, knowledgeable, friendly and compassionate, provided conservative treatment, value and respect. Figure 1. VSQ-9 Scores and Main Themes from Patient and Parent VSQ-9 Responses Conclusion Parents and patients reported being highly satisfied with APP care in a pediatric rheumatology shared care model. Female patients reported lower satisfaction scores than other groups indicating a need for further investigation of their health care experiences. Lack of validation of the VSQ in pediatric populations may have impacted results as well as relevance of questions regarding arthritis management considering 44% of the sample did not have arthritis. Qualitative descriptions are consistent with APP literature[3] and should be considered when defining important aspects of APP roles. [1.] Ahluwalia V. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021;14:1299-310. [2.] Thierry S. Joint Bone Spine 2014;81(2):112-7. [3.] Fullerton LM. Pragmat Obs Res 2020;11:1-12.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».