MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6966824045 · doi:10.48436/pcbjd-4wa12

OCID – Object Clutter Indoor Dataset

2019· dataset· en· W6966824045 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueTU Wien Research Data · 2019
Typedataset
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClutterObject (grammar)SegmentationSet (abstract data type)Ground truthRobotObject detectionCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

OCID – Object Clutter Indoor Dataset Developing robot perception systems for handling objects in the real-world requires computer vision algorithms to be carefully scrutinized with respect to the expected operating domain. This demands large quantities of ground truth data to rigorously evaluate the performance of algorithms. The Object Cluttered Indoor Dataset is an RGBD-dataset containing point-wise labeled point-clouds for each object. The data was captured using two ASUS-PRO Xtion cameras that are positioned at different heights. It captures diverse settings of objects, background, context, sensor to scene distance, viewpoint angle and lighting conditions. The main purpose of OCID is to allow systematic comparison of existing object segmentation methods in scenes with increasing amount of clutter. In addition OCID does also provide ground-truth data for other vision tasks like object-classification and recognition. OCID comprises 96 fully built up cluttered scenes. Each scene is a sequence of labeled pointclouds which are created by building a increasing cluttered scene incrementally and adding one object after the other. The first item in a sequence contains no objects, the second one object, up to the final count of added objects. Dataset The dataset uses 89 different objects that are chosen representatives from the Autonomous Robot Indoor Dataset(ARID)[1] classes and YCB Object and Model Set (YCB)[2] dataset objects. The ARID20 subset contains scenes including up to 20 objects from ARID. The ARID10 and YCB10 subsets include cluttered scenes with up to 10 objects from ARID and the YCB objects respectively. The scenes in each subset are composed of objects from only one set at a time to maintain separation between datasets. Scene variation includes different floor (plastic, wood, carpet) and table textures (wood, orange striped sheet, green patterned sheet). The complete set of data provides 2346 labeled point-clouds. OCID subsets are structured so that specific real-world factors can be individually assessed. ARID20-structure location: floor, table view: bottom, top scene: sequence-id free: clearly separated (objects 1-9 in corresponding sequence) touching: physically touching (objects 10-16 in corresponding sequence) stacked: on top of each other (objects 17-20 in corresponding sequence) ARID10-structure location: floor, table view: bottom, top box: objects with sharp edges (e.g. cereal-boxes) curved: objects with smooth curved surfaces (e.g. ball) mixed: objects from both the box and curved fruits: fruit and vegetables non-fruits: mixed objects without fruits scene: sequence-id YCB10-structure location: floor, table view: bottom, top box: objects with sharp edges (e.g. cereal-boxes) curved: objects with smooth curved surfaces (e.g. ball) mixed: objects from both the box and curved scene: sequence-id Structure: You can find all labeled pointclouds of the ARID20 dataset for the first sequence on a table recorded with the lower mounted camera in this directory: ./ARID20/table/bottom/seq01/pcd/ In addition to labeled organized point-cloud files, corresponding depth, RGB and 2d-label-masks are available: pcd: 640×480 organized XYZRGBL-pointcloud file with ground truth rgb: 640×480 RGB png-image depth: 640×480 16-bit png-image with depth in mm label: 640×480 16-bit png-image with unique integer-label for each object at each pixel Dataset creation using EasyLabel: OCID was created using EasyLabel – a semi-automatic annotation tool for RGBD-data. EasyLabel processes recorded sequences of organized point-cloud files and exploits incrementally built up scenes, where in each take one additional object is placed. The recorded point-cloud data is then accumulated and the depth difference between two consecutive recordings are used to label new objects. The code is available here. OCID data for instance recognition/classification For ARID10 and ARID20 there is additional data available usable for object recognition and classification tasks. It contains semantically annotated RGB and depth image crops extracted from the OCID dataset. The structure is as follows: type: depth, RGB class name: eg. banana, kleenex, … class instance: eg. banana_1, banana_2, kleenex_1, kleenex_2,… The data is provided by Mohammad Reza Loghmani. Research paper If you found our dataset useful, please cite the following paper: @inproceedings{DBLP:conf/icra/SuchiPFV19, author = {Markus Suchi and Timothy Patten and David Fischinger and Markus Vincze}, title = {EasyLabel: {A} Semi-Automatic Pixel-wise Object Annotation Tool for Creating Robotic {RGB-D} Datasets}, booktitle = {International Conference on Robotics and Automation, {ICRA} 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 20-24, 2019}, pages = {6678--6684}, year = {2019}, crossref = {DBLP:conf/icra/2019}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793917}, doi = {10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793917}, timestamp = {Tue, 13 Aug 2019 20:25:20 +0200}, biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/icra/SuchiPFV19}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org} } @proceedings{DBLP:conf/icra/2019, title = {International Conference on Robotics and Automation, {ICRA} 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 20-24, 2019}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, year = {2019}, url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8780387}, isbn = {978-1-5386-6027-0}, timestamp = {Tue, 13 Aug 2019 20:23:21 +0200}, biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/icra/2019}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org} } Contact & credits For any questions or issues with the OCID-dataset, feel free to contact the author: Markus Suchi – email: suchi@acin.tuwien.ac.at Tim Patten – email: patten@acin.tuwien.ac.at For specific questions about the OCID-semantic crops data please contact: Mohammad Reza Loghmani – email: loghmani@acin.tuwien.ac.at References [1] Loghmani, Mohammad Reza et al. "Recognizing Objects in-the-Wild: Where do we Stand?" 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2018): 2170-2177. [2] Berk Calli, Arjun Singh, James Bruce, Aaron Walsman, Kurt Konolige, Siddhartha Srinivasa, Pieter Abbeel, Aaron M Dollar, Yale-CMU-Berkeley dataset for robotic manipulation research, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, Issue 3, pp. 261 – 268, April 2017.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,100

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0070,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,003
Bibliométrie0,0060,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0070,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,460
Tête enseignante GPT0,524
Écart entre enseignants0,064 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTU Wien Research DataTravaux en français237 207