Trogolemur storeri Perry & Dutchak & Theodor 2023, n. sp.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Trogolemur storeri n. sp. zoobank.org/ 99CE821F-1FDA-4FC0-A7CE-AC1B6A84971F Type. Left upper first molar discovered by K. A. Prufrock in matrix collected by John Storer and crew, RSM P3450.1466 (fig. 2A, 2E). Horizon and type locality. Interbedded conglomerate and coarse sandstone of Uintan middle Eocene age, Swift Current Creek locality, southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada (Russell, 1965a, 1965b, 1972; Storer, 1978, 1996). Diagnosis. Approximately 30% smaller in linear dimensions than Trogolemur leonardi; buccal notch much shallower; greater development of lingual cingulum. Differs from Trogolemur myodes in M1 being wider relative to length, more pronounced lingual cingulum, much shallower buccal notch. Differs from Trogolemur amplior in being considerably smaller. Differs from Trogolemur myodes in m3 having much more taper distally, with long and narrow hypoconulid lobe. Differs from Trogolemur fragilis in having a less distinct paraconid on m3 that sits closer to the metaconid, slightly longer and narrower hypoconulid lobe. Etymology. ‘storeri’ named for John E. Storer who described the first primates from the Swift Current Creek locality and in honor of his extensive contributions to Canadian paleontology. Hypodigm. Lm3, RSM P3450.1467; Rm3, RSM P3450.1468. Summary of Changes The following list summarizes suggested changes to the record for the genus Trogolemur. • Trogolemur myodes USNM 417396 is an M1, not an M2. • Trogolemur leonardi RSM P 1899.1014 and RSM P1899.1016 are M3s, not M2s. • Trogolemur leonardi RSM P 1899.1007 is an M2, not an M1. • Trogolemur leonardi RSM P 1899.1002, RSM P1899.1003, and RSM P1899.1004, all identified as m1 or m2, are likely m1s. New records of Trogolemur include a left M1 (RSM P3450.1466), a left m3 (RSM P3450.1467), and a right m3 (RSM P3450.1468). These are described as a new species, Trogolemur storeri. With very little morphological difference between Trogolemur storeri and Trogolemur leonardi apart from size, and with little geographic separation, it seems likely that the former is a phyletic antecedent to the latter. New Discoveries – Walshina An upper molar resembling Trogolemur leonardi, but approximately 50% larger in linear dimensions, was discovered in the SCC matrix (Figure 5). Slight erosion along the buccal and distal margins has altered the outline of the tooth. Nevertheless, this tooth (RSM P3450.1469) is recognizable as a primate right M1 (or possibly M2). The tooth has a broad basin distal to the protocone; this is distinctive of trogolemurin omomyoids. It greatly resembles CM 15635 (LM1) from the Uintan Badwater Creek, Wyoming. That tooth was originally described as Phenacolemur mcgrewi by Peter Robinson, then allocated to Ignacius by Bown and Rose (Robinson, 1968; Bown and Rose, 1976). Subsequent analysis by López-Torres and colleagues has shifted this material from the Paromomyidae (Plesiadapiformes) to the Trogolemurini (Omomyidae), renaming the relevant material as Walshina mcgrewi (López-Torres, et al., 2018). We provisionally refer the new tooth to Walshina mcgrewi. Given the rarity of primate material at SCC, it is interesting that there are two known species of trogolemurin omomyid at this locality. Thus, diversity of trogolemurins is slightly higher here than in contemporaneous faunas in Wyoming or southern California. Despite the enormous geographic separation, trogolemurins existed simultaneously in all these places. This speaks to the similarity in climate across much of North America in the middle Eocene, and/or to the adaptability of these tiny primates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,063 | 0,023 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».