MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6967833164 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12727232

Ptychognathus barbatus

2024· article· en· W6967833164 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Établissements canadiensCégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCarapaceDorsumFront (military)Shot (pellet)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ptychognathus barbatus (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873) (Fig. 11A–H, 12A–B) Gnathograpsus barbatus A. Milne-Edwards, 1873: 316, pl. 17: 4. Ptychognathus barbatus.— De Man, 1895: 105.— Fransen et al., 1997: 127. Type material. (All New Caledonia) Syntypes: MNHN-IU-2000-10877 (= MNHN-B10877), 3 ♂ (dry material, mounted on board) 9.0– 9.8 mm × 11.0– 12.7 mm, coll. B. Balansa; MNHN-IU-2000-3395 (= MNHN-B3395), 1 ♂ (dry material), coll. B. Balansa; MNHN-IU-2000-3401 (= MNHN-B3401), 2 ♂ (dry material), coll. B. Balansa; MNHN-IU-2000-3394 (= MNHN-B3394), 2 ♂ (dry material), ♂ 10.0 mm × 12.0 mm, ♂ 9.6 × 11.6 mm, coll. B. Balansa; MNHN-IU-2008-10675 (= MNHN-B12605), 1 ♂ (in ethanol, regenerated dry material), coll. B. Balansa; RMNH-D192, 1 ♂ (12.3 mm × 10.0 mm), coll. B. Balansa; USNM-20308: 3 ♂ (9.5–11.9 mm × 8.0– 9.8 mm), 2 ♀ (9.4–9.6 mm × 7.8 mm), coll. B. Balansa. Other material examined. NEW CALEDONIA. MNHN-IU-2019-210 (DNA voucher: CA2467), 1 ♂, 9.6 mm × 8.0 mm, Wadjana waterfall, 22°17.603'S, 167°0.859'E, coll. G. Marquet & V. de Mazancourt, 13 September 2018; MNHN-IU-2022-4124, 1 ♂, 8.8 mm × 7.7 mm, Wadjana waterfall, 22°17.603'S, 167°0.859'E, coll. G. Marquet & V. de Mazancourt, 13 September 2018; MNHN-IU-2017-8250, 3 ♂, 9.4 mm × 8.0 mm to 9.8 mm × 9.1 mm, 2 ♀, 8.7 mm × 7.7 mm, 9.0 mm × 7.9 mm, coll. B. Balansa. Diagnosis. Carapace subquadrate, dorsal surface smooth, flat; front broad, anterior margin slightly concave medially; anterolateral margin with 3 teeth including orbital tooth. Merus of third maxilliped with anteroexternal angle broad; exopod, 0.7–1.2 times broader than ischium. Chelipeds large, symmetrical in males, fingers with small tuft of setae at tips of pollex. Single pulvinus at base of fingers. Merus and carpus of ambulatory legs glabrous. Description. Carapace (Fig. 11A) subquadrate, slightly broader than long, 1.2 times as broad as long, flat, dorsal surface smooth and glabrous. Regions poorly defined, central H-shaped grooves distinct; epigastric cristae barely visible. Front broad, anterior margin, divided into 2 lobes, slightly concave medially. Frontal width 0.47–0.51 times CW, fronto-orbital width 0.84–0.90 times CW. Anterolateral margins and supraorbital margins lined with small granules. Upper margin of orbit weakly sinuous. Anterolateral margins each with 3 teeth including orbital tooth; first tooth largest and more distinct, second and third blunt, third tooth indistinct or notch. Posterolateral margins divergent posteriorly, moderately sloping outwards. Lateral and posterolateral margins regularly furnished with short, soft setae. Third maxillipeds (Fig. 11B) with ischium subequal in proximal and distal widths, lateral margin concave, ventral surface with longitudinal median ridge. Merus with anterolateral angle broad; ventral surface with oblique ridge on mesial part. Exopod broad, inflated, greatest width 0.9–1.2 (♂), 0.7–1.0 (♀) times of median width of ischium. Male chelipeds (Fig. 11C) symmetrical, not granular at all. Merus longer than broad (length to width ratio 1.1– 2.2); anterior and posterior margins glabrous, posterior distal margins bluntly carinate. Carpus, unarmed, strongly inflated, slightly shorter than wide (length to width ration 0.8–1.0). Palm inflated, smooth, without distinct granules; inner surface glabrous. Fingers with tuft of long setae on outer surface restricted at base of fingers. Dactylus shorter than palm, 0.7–1.0 times as long as palm, terminating in small, hoof-shaped corneous claw bearing 9 or 10 small blunt teeth. Pollex with 4 or 5 larger blunt teeth. Proximal half of fingers with long dense soft setae; single pulvinus at base of fingers. Female chelipeds (Fig. 11D) distinctly smaller than those of male, chela much narrower than that of male. Fingers with smaller and fewer enlarged teeth. Proximal half of fingers without long dense soft setae; without pulvinus at base of fingers; pollex with ridge consisting of large granules toward palm and ending with distal tuft of setae. Ambulatory legs (P2–5) comparatively long, slender, somewhat compressed laterally; P4 longest (male: length 1.3–1.4 times carapace width) P5 shortest. Merus elongated, subrectangular in lateral view, unarmed; anterior margins and posterior margins of merus of P2–5 glabrous. Anterior margin of carpus with few short setae, posterior margin glabrous. Propodus with dense short setae on anterior margins and dense short setae and long setae on posterior margins. Ventral surface with rows of short setae. Dactylus terminating in subacute corneous claw, with dense short setae on anterior and posterior margins; dorsal and ventral surface with rows of short setae. P3 merus (Fig. 11E) length to width ratio 1.9–3.3, carpus length to width ratio 1.8–2.1, propodus length to width ratio 1.3–2.0, dactylus length to width ratio 4.1–4.5, dactylus 0.7–1.3 times as long as propodus. P5 merus (Fig. 11F) length to width ratio 2.2–3.3, carpus length to width ratio 1.6–2.6, propodus length to width ratio 1.1–1.9, dactylus length to width ratio 2.6–3.9, dactylus 0.7–0.9 times as long as propodus. Male pleon (Fig. 11G) narrow, broadly triangular, nearly smooth, distinctly narrowed at base of telson; lateral margins of first to fifth somites nearly straight; margins covered with short setae, distal margin of telson with tuft of setae. Telson linguiform, terminal margin broadly rounded; length 1.1 times basal width, 1.0–1.4 times longer than sixth somite, sixth somite 1.1–1.7 times longer than fifth somite. Female pleon (Fig. 11H) very broad, covering most of thoracic sternum, fourth somite broadest. Telson broadly subtriangular, terminal margin broadly rounded, length 0.43–0.51 of basal width, 1.1 times longer than sixth somite, sixth somite 1.0–1.1 times longer than fifth somite, measured on midline. Male G1 (Fig. 11I) slender, 6 times as long as wide, slightly curving dorsally; tip bluntly rounded, forming short chitinous structure; subdistal lobe obtuse, partially obscured by stiff setae. Colouration in life. Body, chelipeds and legs orange (Fig. 12A and B). Size. Small-sized. The largest male specimen examined is 9.6 mm × 8.0 mm and the largest female 9.0 mm × 7.9 mm. Habitat. Ptychognathus barbatus lives on seashores influenced by freshwater flows. Indeed, it was found under rocks on a beach next to the estuary of the Wadjana waterfall in the South Province of New Caledonia (Fig. 12D). Distribution. Apparently endemic to New Caledonia (Fig. 6). Remarks. Ptychognathus barbatus is not known from Polynesia but is re-described herein for comparison purposes. It was reported from Banda Aceh (Indonesia) and Penang Island (Malaysia) by De Man (1895: 105–111, fig. 23), from Japan by Sakai (1939: 638–639, text-fig. 348) and from Madagascar by Crosnier (1965: 36–38, figs. 42–45) but this species seems to be in fact restricted to New Caledonia. It can be distinguished from the other species previously reported under this name by features of the frontal region, setae on ambulatory legs and telson of male (see next species).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMarine Biology and Ecology Research→Travaux en français237 207→