Notice bibliographique
Résumé
270 Euura leucotrocha (Hartig, 1837) Figs 215, 507 Nematus leucotrochus Hartig, 1837: 193–194. Lectotype designated below. Nematus maculiventris Hartig, 1840: 25. Type locality: northern Germany. No specimens located. Synonymy by Konow (1903b). Nematus haemorrhoidalis Hartig, 1840: 26. Lectotype designated by Haris (1997). Primary homonym of Nematus haemorrhoidalis Spinola, 1808 (= Nematus haemmorhoidalis Spinola, 1808). Syn. nov. Nematus caudalis Eversmann, 1847: 16. Lectotype designated below. Syn. nov. Nematus approximatus Förster, 1854a: 320–321. Lectotype designated by Viitasaari (1980). Synonymy by Konow (1903b). Nematus consobrinus Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1871: 237–242, pl, 10. Syntypes ♀ ♂, not located by Thomas (1987). Type locality: Netherlands, Haarlem. Synonymy by Konow (1899). Nematus umbrinus Zaddach, 1876: 84–85. Syntypes ♀ ♂, probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type localities: Poland, Silesia and Gdansk [Danzig]; Russia, Kaliningrad [Königsberg]. Synonymy by Konow (1903b). Nematus incertus W.F. Kirby, 1882: 107. Replacement name for Nematus haemorrhoidalis Hartig, 1840. Nematus sauterianus Zaddach, 1883 in Brischke 1883 147, 153. Holotype ♀, probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type locality: East Prussia. Synonymy by Konow (1903b). Nematus multiplex Zaddach, 1883 in Brischke 1883: 188. Syntypes ♀♀ (MNHW), not examined. Type locality: Silesia. Synonymy by Konow (1903b). Pteronidea cognata Lindqvist, 1958: 108–111. Synonymy with approximatus by Lindqvist (1962a). Diagnosis Typically, the extensively pale head (including antenna), thorax, abdomen, and costa generally paler than pterostigma distinguish males and females from the others in the group. Smaller subapical tooth of claws compared to E. ribesii (subapical tooth broad and as long as apical tooth) and larger compared to E. gracilidentata additionally distinguishes E. leucotrocha females from these two species. Males of E. gracilidentata also tend to have a smaller subapical tooth (can be almost absent) than in E. leucotrocha, but also have a different colour pattern, with the black head and thorax contrasting with the yellow abdomen (in E. leucotrocha the colouration of head and thorax varies together with the abdomen, in a similar way, from mostly black to extensively pale). Males of most other species can be distinguished from E. leucotrocha by the shape of the projection of tergite 8 (see under E. ribesii) and penis valves (see under E. ribesicola, E. similator, and E. vastatrix). Darker specimens of E. leucotrocha might not be clearly distinguishable from E. quieta, but usually the clypeus seems to be more deeply excised in E. quieta than in E. leucotrocha. The male type specimen of caudalis seems to fit better with leucotrocha (projection of tergite 8 broader, less emarginate clypeus) than ZMUO.029729 (quieta). Males can also be rather dark (ZMUO.036046): antenna black, head slightly pale around eyes (clypeus, labrum, lower orbits and slightly supraclypeal area pale), mesepisternum black, abdomen dorsally mostly black. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus leucotrochus, here designated GERMANY – Niedersachsen • ♀; Harz; 51.8° N, 10.3° E; W. Saxesen leg.; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3338. Paralectotype Nematus leucotrochus GERMANY • 1 ♀; same data as for lectotype; NFVG, GBIF-GISHym4684. Lectotype Nematus haemorrhoidalis GERMANY • ♂; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, DEI-GISHym12490. Lectotype Nematus caudalis, here designated RUSSIA – Tatarstan • ♂; Kasan Province; 55.8° N, 49.1° E; E. Eversmann leg.; ZIN, DEI-GISHym30028. Lectotype Nematus approximatus GERMANY – Nordrhein-Westfalen • ♀; Aachen area; 50.77° N, 6.09° E; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3203. Holotype Pteronidea cognata FINLAND – Uusimaa • ♀; Helsinki, Munksnäs [Munkkiniemi]; 60.22° N, 24.89° E; 2 Apr. 1955; E. Lindqvist leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus.fi/GL.2455. Host plants Ribes spp. Possibly there are regional differences in preferences for host species: in Finland R. rubrum L. is preferred, whereas in Germany and the British Isles R. uva-crispa L. is the usual host (Benson 1958a; Pschorn-Walcher & Altenhofer 2000). According to Viitasaari (1980) frequently also R. nigrum L., although this could refer to E. quieta even though Viitasaari (1980) separated this species from E. leucotrocha. Genetics COI Based on 9 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 5.17% and the nearest neighbours, diverging by a minimum of 0.46%, are Euura quieta and E. gracilidentata. Nuclear Based on 10 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.86% (0.64% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.5%, is Euura gracilidentata. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Russia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».