Dysagrionites Archibald and Cannings
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
collective genus Dysagrionites Archibald and Cannings Figure 1 Remarks. Archibald and Cannings (Archibald et al. 2021) created the genus-level collective taxon Dysagrionites to function as a holding bin for fossil odonates referrable to the Dysagrioninae (Cephalozygoptera, Dysagrionidae) that can be clearly separated from species of that subfamily but whose nominal generic affinity is unclear by the preservation and completeness of their currently known specimens. Collective taxa are regulated by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999, for example, articles 42.2.1 and 42.3.1). Archibald et al. (2021) referred three species to the parataxon: Dysagrionites delinei Archibald and Cannings and Dysagrionites sp. A and Dysagrionites sp. B. They erred, however, in that the parataxon definition required that those species are established as members of the Dysagrioninae, and although this strongly appears to be the case, these fragmentary fossils lack enough of the character states that, in combination, firmly place them in the family and, therefore, in this subfamily. Simonsen et al. (2024) subsequently established a diagnosis of Dysagrionidae using wings alone; however, known specimens of Dysagrionites species still lack sufficient morphology for confirmation. We emend the collective taxon definition by adding “or tentatively so”: This genus-level collective group name is proposed for any fossil species referable to the Dysagrioninae, or tentatively so, that can be clearly defined at the species level, separating them from other species of the subfamily, but whose orthotaxon generic affinity is unclear by the incomplete preservation of its currently known specimens. Dysagrionites then includes these three species and D. allenbyensis, described here. If our assumption that D. allenbyensis is a dysagrionid is correct, it belongs to the Dysagrioninae, as the origin of its RP3–4 is about two-thirds the distance between the arculus and nodus and IR2 originates at the subnodus [Petrolestinae: RP3–4 originates more proximally, closer to, or at, the point midway between the arculus and subnodus, and IR2 originates close to, or on, RP3–4; subfamily diagnoses were summarised by Archibald et al. 2021]. Allenbya holmesae Archibald and Cannings is the only previously known non-anisopteran odonate from the Allenby Formation. It is also tentatively treated as a dysagrionid and cephalozygopteran but is distinct enough to be assigned to a nominal genus (Archibald and Cannings 2022). It is also a fragmentary wing, but in this case, the distal portion is preserved. It is distinct from D. allenbyensis; for example, IR1 is zigzagged, and the postnodal and postsubnodal crossveins are not aligned.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».