MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968221946 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15277561

Microphotina viridescens

2025· article· en· W6968221946 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalEspace pour la vie
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésKey (lock)DNA barcodingAdult maleMorphology (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Microphotina viridescens (Chopard, 1912) Figs. 1, 2A–D, 3A–G, 4D, 5A–B, D, 6A–G Photina viridescens Chopard, 1912: 324 [original description, m]. Microphotina viridescens (Chopard, 1912): François & Roy, 2015: 394 [rescued from synonymy with M. vitripennis, taxonomy, morphology, distribution, photo of holotype, male genitalia]; Rivera & Svenson, 2020: 101 [checklist, taxonomy]; Moulin & Roy, 2020: 37 [checklist, DNA barcoding data]; Schwarz et al., 2020: 31 [comparison to M. panguanensis Schwarz, 2020, in key to species]; Lanna et al., 2023: 88 [checklist, taxonomy, in key to species, distribution]; Moulin, 2025: 160 [checklist, taxonomy, male genitalia, in key to FG species]. Material examined. All material from French Guiana. 1 male, 1 female with egg case, Roura, Réserve naturelle régionale Trésor, 4.61042 -52.2790, elev. 250m, 25.XI.2022 (AEMG — N. Hausherr leg.); 1 female with egg case, Roura, Réserve naturelle régionale Trésor, 4.61042 -52.2790, elev. 250m, 26.XI.2022 (AEMG — N. Hausherr leg.); 1 male, Roura, near Fourgassier, ca. 4 km NW Réserve naturelle régionale Trésor, 4.6379 -52.3021, 114m, 25.XI.2022 (E. Serres leg.); 1 male, Roura, nr. Fourgassier, 4km NW Réserve naturelle régionale Trésor, 4.6379 -52.3021, 114m, 26.XI.2022 (E. Serres leg.); 1 female, Kourou, end of Dégrad Saramaka road, elev. 9m, 5.0143 -52.6989, 25.VII.2022 (E. Loeb leg). We also examined one male and one female reared from each of the two egg cases collected. They are labeled as the progenitor females as indicated above. Distribution. Widespread in FG, with records from Cacao, Kourou, Mana, Maripasoula, Montsinéry-Tonnegrande, Regina, Roura, Saint-Georges, and Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni communes. Description, Female. Coloration (Fig. 1A–D) of living individuals uniformly leaf green, except for a whitish strip extending between the proximal half of the forewing’s costal area and the base of the pronotal metazona, and a large yellowish-orange region over abdominal terga 1–4 (concealed by the wings when at rest). In drypreserved specimens, body coloration, including the abdomen, fading to pale green to yellowish, with whitish regions becoming less conspicuous. Measurements in Table 1. aApproximated; body length measurements may vary due to the non-rigid nature of the abdomen. bAs measured from the proximal bend of the tibia to the metatarsal insertion. cSpecimen portrayed in Fig. 1C dSpecimen portrayed in Fig. 1D Head (Fig. 1E) distinctly wider than long, pentagonal in shape. Juxtaocular bulges moderately developed and elevated as much as the vertex, extending above an imaginary line connecting the top of the compound eyes. Compound eyes kidney-shaped with rounded lateral margins, ocelli minute. Lower frons narrow, approximately 5.5–6 times wider than long. Antennae filiform and slightly longer than the pronotum, flagellomeres of the basal third green but darkening towards the distal third, becoming primarily dark brown. Pronotum (Fig. 1F) moderately robust, its surface smooth, longitudinal carina inconspicuous, only faintly indicated across the supracoxal sulcus. Lateral margins of the pronotum bearing small triangular denticles, the same absent along the supracoxal dilation. Ratio metazona/prozona = 2.47–2.54 (average ≈ 2.5). Anterior margin of prozona rounded, lateral margins almost parallel. Prothoracic legs relatively robust. Forecoxae surface smooth, inner aspect with short and scattered pilosity (especially concentrated on the basal third), anterior and posterior margins with small serrulations, apical lobes strongly divergent. Foreleg spination formula: F=4DS/14AvS/5–6PvS; T=14–16AvS/19PvS. Forefemora (Fig. 1G– H) with tibial spur groove at its proximal third. The third DS the longest, second DS slightly longer than the fourth, and first DS very small, almost indistinct. Forefemoral AvS equidistant, similar in size, except for the shorter 11th and 13th, and four basalmost AvS arranged in two rows. Forefemoral typically with 5 PvS, exceptionally 6 (Fig. 1H). Distance between 1st and 2nd PvS is shortest among any other contiguous pair within the same series. Each genicular lobe bearing a small spine. Foretibiae dorsal margin mostly straight, PvS and AvS declined, increasing in size distally, PvS smaller than AvS. All foreleg spines pale green with dark tips. Meso- and metathoracic legs narrow (Fig. 1C–D), midtibiae shorter than corresponding femora. Mesothoracic wing membrane green and opaque, veins slightly darker than surrounding membrane, creating a contrasting reticulated pattern. Stigma elongated and green, matching the color (=concolorous) of the veins. Costal area whitish proximally, progressively turning green distally, bearing irregular reticulation. Metathoracic wings opaque, costal area yellowish green, discoidal area yellow except for a narrow green distal portion, anal area orange (Figs. 1A‒D). Wings typically reaching just beyond the distal margin of tergum 5 In resting position (variable depending on the degree of abdominal distention). Abdomen fusiform, lacking lobes or projections. Supraanal plate triangular with a rounded apex. Cerci setulose, longer than the supraanal and subgenital plates, comprising 11 visible cercomeres (first visible cercomere consisting of a few fused segments), last cercomere conical with rounded tip, longer than wide. Genitalia (Fig. 1I) with apical lobe (gpal8) of gonapophysis 8 (gp8) bearing long setae. The aulax (al), a longitudinal dorsal groove located in the middle of gp8 accommodating the rachis of gp9, elongated, its internal ridge extending forward to form a trapezoidal protrusion ending in a narrow, curved lobe; in lateral view, the tip of gp8 appearing wrench-like (Fig. 1J). Apex of gonoplac 9 (gl9) truncated and shallowly notched. Gonapophysis 9 (gp9) pointy, with the rachis and mesal gonapophyseal sclerite 9 (GPm9) well-sclerotized, the latter being narrow and straight. The accessory gland supporting lobe (agsl) membranous, accessory gland sclerite (AG) moderately sclerotized. Coxae 8 (CX8) elongated. The ventrolateral coxal lobelet (cxvl) well-developed, laterally projected and forked. Ootheca (Fig. 2A–D) semi-spherical, outer wall thin and smooth, caramel brown in color (unhatched egg cases may have a greenish tinge); no visible traces of external coating on the outer wall. The proximal end of the ootheca fully or partially encircling the attaching substrate; in this case, the petiole of a leaf or its midvein. At the fixation point, the emergence area forming an angle of 100–120 degrees relative to the substrate; as a result, the ventral surface of the ootheca exposed. The emergence area itself convex and distally raised (better observed in the lateral view), forming a ridge with a slightly curved apex. The emergence area encompassing 18–20 openings (the same are sealed with a whitish, spongious material in freshly laid specimens). Inside the ootheca, approximately 62– 75 eggs observed, the eggs in contact with the inner wall, as indicated by the rounded scars left at their point of contact. Measurements (mm): length (from tip to fixation point): 10.98–11.13; width: 7.18–7.2; length of emergence area: 11.11–11.33; max. girth: 23.17–24.2; width of emergence area: 1.42–1.62. Remarks on male morphology. The examined males of M. viridescens match the redescription provided by François & Roy (2015). However, we find it pertinent to clarify two aspects that we consider ambiguous in François & Roy’s (2015) treatment of this species: (i) the chromatic characteristics of the male wings and (ii) the anatomical details of the left phallomere’s posterior process (paa). The male holotype of M. viridescens (Fig. 3A) is peculiar because its wings possess a yellowish green, tessellated pattern, a unique feature not observed in males of any other member of the Photinainae. Concerning this attribute, François & Roy (2015, p. 394) wrote (translated from French): i) “Wide elytra [...] more or less translucent with pale green veins, the costal and radial veins of the same color as the apex, which is of a deeper green shade ”; ii) “Wings [...] with a similar coloration pattern, the apex being more or less greenish, as observed in the holotype ”; and iii) “The male holotype is distinguished from all others by its less translucent flight organs with more extensive opaque borders …” Based on our analysis of specimens, we find that the text by François & Roy (2015) is ambiguous in characterizing the wing pigmentation, as it suggests that this characteristic is more accentuated in the holotype, thus implying that the same trait is present in other males but to a lesser extent. Unfortunately, François & Roy (2015) only portrayed the male holotype, and thus this character could not be corroborated in other specimens reported within the same publication. To clarify this issue, we consulted with N. Moulin, who informed us that male specimens of this species reported by François & Roy (2015) and deposited at the MNHN have, like the specimens we examined, typical male Microphotina wings, i.e., hyaline and unpigmented (Fig. 3B). This confirms that the holotype of M. viridescens corresponds to an anomalous individual in which wing pigmentation attributes, commonly observed in females, may have been expressed, possibly in response to the activity of an internal parasite, as speculated by François & Roy (2015). There are other reported cases of intersexual specimens designated as holotypes in the taxonomic history of Neotropical Mantodea. For example, Lombardo & Umbriaco (2011) discovered that Parastagmatoptera abnormis Beier, 1963 was a parasite-induced intersexual individual of P. flavoguttata (Audinet-Serville, 1839) (Mantidae), while Agudelo (2014) reported a similar case in the “female” holotype of Photina gracilis Giglio-Tos, 1915, which turned out to be a remarkable case of a fully feminized male of Photina vitrea (Burmeister, 1838) (Photinaidae). In the previous cases, the presence of horsehair wo

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetAmphibian and Reptile Biology→Travaux en français237 207→