MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968273578 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15218346

Empis (Enoplempis) safra Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6968273578 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueMobile Agent-Based Network Management
Établissements canadiensCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeSetaWingDorsumSternum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Empis (Enoplempis) safra sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A9004A4A-AFFD-4365-8B17-F85BE652A371 (Figs 107–109, 111, 130) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂ (Fig. 107), labelled: “ OREGON: Big Creek [44°57′N 117°41′W], 26/ mi. SE Union, 4200 ft. / Baker Co., E. J. Davis / VI-(12-14)-1977/ Malaise baited with CO 2 ”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / safra Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (WSU). PARATYPES: USA. Oregon: Baker County: Same data as holotype except, 27–30.vi.1976 (1♂, WSU); U. Goose Ck, 34 mi. SE Union [44°56′N 117°25′W], 4160 ft, 12–14.vi.1977, MT baited with CO 2, E.G. Davis (1♀, WSU); same data except, 19–22.vi.1977 (2♂, 3♀, WSU); same data except, 29.vi–5.vii.1975 (1♀, WSU); Velvet Ck [45°1′N 117°31′W], 28 mi. SE Union, 4720 ft, Wallowa-Whitman NF, 17.vi.1977, sweeping, WJT (3♂, 1♀, CNC); same data except, 20–22.vi.1976, E.J. Davis (1♀, WSU). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of the E. (En.) canaster species group by the yellow body colour, scutum with pair of yellowish-brown vittae, two paint brush-like preapical ventral lobes on the male hind femur, pair of digitiform basal processes on the male hind tibia, and the length of the distal dorsal setae of the male hind tibia is longer than width of tibia (Figs 107–109). Description. Wing length 7.1–7.5 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) canaster, except as follows: head grey in ground-colour, with pale greyish pruinescence. Ocellar triangle elevated, with thin greyish pruinescence, with very short, parallel ocellar setae, shorter than triangle and several short setulae. Occiput with single median row of strong, stiff setae, subequal in length to ocellar setae; postocular setae with upper 2–3 setae stronger and slightly longer than ocellar setae, with shorter, thinner lower postocular setae. Postpedicel and stylus dark; scape and pedicel distinctly yellowish-brown; scape slightly more than 2× longer than pedicel; postpedicel long, tapered, 4× longer than basal width; stylus slightly more than 1.5× longer than basal width of postpedicel. Palpus pale, yellowish brown, with dark setulae. Thorax yellow in ground-colour, densely grey pruinescent (Fig. 107). Scutum with pair of yellowish brown vittae running between setal rows; apex of postpronotal lobe shiny yellow. Postpronotum with 1 short seta and several dark, stiff setulae. Scutum with short, fine uniserial acr; dc uniserial, slightly longer, stronger than acr; 1 posterior npl, with 1–2 very short anterior npl; 1 presut spal; 1 psut spal; 1 pal. Scutellum with 1 widely separated pair of short sctl, aligned with dc row, shorter than half length of scutellum; 1 outer, shorter pair of marginal setulae. Laterotergite with narrow patch of 2–4 strong, dark setae. Legs slender, yellow, tarsi slightly darker; coxae yellow, often with thin pruinescence (Fig. 107). Fore femur clothed in short, black setae. Fore tarsomere 1 swollen, slightly broader than apex of tibia, without dense setulae; long ventral setae, longer than width of tarsomere; tarsomeres 2–5 with biserial row of spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, longer than width of segment. Hind femur with 2 preapical, paint brush-like ventral processes and outer, broad, laterally flattened posteroventral process with tuft of black setae; small knob-like posteroventral process distal to broad process; medial paint brush-like process narrow without base; outer paint brush-like process broad with setae longer laterally, directed obliquely; apex of femur without preapical row of posterior setae; preapical anterior seta strong, shorter than width of femur (Figs 108, 109). Hind tibia with pair of processes on basal quarter; posteroventral process short, broad with crown of apicolateral black setae; anteroventral process short, expanded laterally with short, strong setae along apical face and longer, thinner apical setae; setae in posteroapical comb; apical half with long dorsal setae, longer apically, slightly longer than width of tibia; ventral face with fine, erect setae (Figs 107–109). Hind tarsomere 1 somewhat inflated, with several long dorsal setae, similar to tibia; tarsomeres 2–5 similar to mid tarsus. Abdomen yellow, with thin pruinescence, concolourous with scutum; long, pale lateral setae on pregenital segments. Pregenital segments unmodified, except sclerites of segment 8 narrowly separated, fused anteriorly. Terminalia (Fig. 111): yellow, shiny with cercus dark brown. Cercus, rectangular; dorsal margin slightly sinuous; apex rounded, downcurved; setae longer than width of cercus; weakly fused anteriorly to epandrium. Subepandrium without process; with row of medium-length setae. Epandrial lamella subtriangular, higher than long; posterior margin without projection, bearing longest setae along posterior margin; setae shorter than half length of epandrium. Hypandrium short, truncate, slightly projected laterally with straight apical margin; several thin setae, shorter than length of hypandrium. Phallus very narrow and tubular basally; strongly expanded on basal half, tapered, sinuous apically; apex not emerging beyond cercus; apex not expanded; ejaculatory apodeme longer than length of epandrium, T-shaped, with ventrally positioned lateral apodemes. Female. Similar to male, except as follows: frons broader, nearly as wide as ocellar triangle; hindleg without modified setae and processes; abdominal pleural membrane not expanded; tergite 8 subshiny; cercus brown. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 130). Empis (En.) safra sp. nov. is only known from Baker County, Oregon. Adults have been collected in June and July. Etymology. This species is named after safra (Arabic) in reference to its yellowish body colouration. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,918
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0040,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMobile Agent-Based Network ManagementTravaux en français237 207