MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968302643 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4056192

Glyptapanteles lubomasneri Arias-Penna, sp. nov.

2019· article· en· W6968302643 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueEntomological Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCaterpillarParasitoidScutellumPupaLarvaWhite (mutation)Diapause

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Glyptapanteles lubomasneri Arias-Penna, sp. nov.Figs 142, 143 Female. Body length 2.07 mm, antenna length 2.53 mm, fore wing length 2.53 mm. Type material. <b>Holotype</b>: COSTA RICA • 1♀; 06-SRNP-31462, DHJPAR0005112; Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Pasmompa; rain forest; 440 m; 11.01926, -85.40997; 05.iii.2007; Manuel Rios leg.; caterpillar collected in second instar; white bud-like cocoons and adhered to the larval cuticle, cocoons formed on 13.iv.2006; adult parasitoid emerged on 18.iv.2006; (CNC). <b>Paratypes</b>. • 4 (1♀, 0♂) (3♀, 0♂); 06-SRNP-31462, DHJPAR0005112; same data as for holotype; (CNC). Other material. <b>Reared material.</b> COSTA RICA: <i>Área de Conservación Guanacaste</i> , <i>Guanacaste</i>, <i>Sector Pitilla</i>, <i>Sendero Memos</i>: • 3 (2♀, 0♂) (1♀, 0♂); 05-SRNP-31506, DHJPAR0004242; rain forest; 740 m; 10.98171, -85.42785; 14.iv.2005; Manuel Rios leg.; caterpillar collected in third instar; elongate white bud-like cocoons lightly adhered to each other, cocoons adhered to the leaf substrate, cocoons formed on 24.iv.2005; adult parasitoid emerged on 29.iv.2005. <i>Área de Conservación Guanacaste</i> , <i>Alajuela</i>, <i>Sector San Cristóbal</i>, <i>Tajo Ángeles</i>: • 3 (2♀, 0♂) (0♀, 1♂); 11-SRNP-1210, DHJPAR0042897; rain forest; 540 m; 10.86472, -85.41531; 19.iii.2011; Carolina Cano leg.; caterpillar collected in third instar; cocoons in litter or soil; adult parasitoids emerged on 03.iv.2011. • 8 (2♀, 0♂) (6♀, 0♂); 11-SRNP-1211, DHJPAR0042908; same data for preceding except: adult parasitoid emerged on 04.iv.2011. Diagnosis. Fore telotarsus almost same width throughout, ventral margin without seta, medioposterior band of scutellum only very partially overlapping the medioanterior pit of metanotum (Figs 142C, 143F), phragma of the scutellum partially exposed (Figs 142B, 143F), fore wing with vein 2 cu-a absent, with r vein straight, outer side of junction of r and 2RS veins forming a stub (Figs 142J, 143K), median area on T2 broader than long, lateral grooves delimiting the median area on T2 distally losing definition on T2 (Fig. 143G), and edges of median area on T2 obscured by weak longitudinal stripes (Figs 142D, 143G), vertex in dorsal view wide (Fig. 143D), in lateral view, metasoma laterally compressed (Figs 142A, 143J), T3 longer than T2 (Figs 142G, 143H), inner margin of eyes diverging slightly at antennal sockets (Fig. 143B), petiole on T1 evenly narrowing distally and finely sculptured (Fig. 143G, H), and propodeum without a median longitudinal dent (Figs 142C, 143F). Coloration (Fig. 142A). General body coloration dark brown except scape and pedicel yellow-brown; all antennal flagellomeres dark brown on both sides; labrum and mandibles yellow-brown; glossa, maxillary and labial palps yellow; tegulae light brown. Eyes silver and ocelli reddish (in preserved specimen). Fore and middle legs yellow except brown claws; hind legs yellow except light brown coxae (brown coloration is more extensive on the inner side), distal brown spot on the femora, both ends of tibia and tarsomeres brown, although proximally basitarsus with a small yellow band. Petiole on T1 dark brown and sublateral areas yellow; T2 with median area brown, adjacent area yellow-brown which boundaries with lateral ends are blurred, and yellow lateral ends with two elongate brown spots each one at distal corners; T3 almost completely brown, but proximally with a tiny yellow area; T4 and beyond completely brown; distally each tergum with a narrow yellowish transparent band. In lateral view, T1-2 completely yellow; T3 proximal half yellow, distal half brown; T4 and beyond completely brown. S1-3 yellow; S4 and beyond light brown/brown. Description. <b>Head</b> (Fig. 142A, B, E). Head rounded with pubescence long and dense. Proximal three antennal flagellomeres longer than wide (0.20:0.06, 0.29:0.06, 0.19:0.06), distal antennal flagellomere longer than penultimate (0.13:0.05, 0.10:0.05), antenna longer than body (2.53, 2.07); antennal scrobes-frons shallow. Face dense fine punctations, interspaces smooth, depression only laterally, and longitudinal median carina present. Frons smooth. Temple wide, punctate and interspaces clearly smooth. Inner margin of eyes diverging slightly at antennal sockets; in lateral view, eye anteriorly convex and posteriorly straight. POL shorter than OOL (0.08, 0.13). Malar suture present. Median area between lateral ocelli without depression. Vertex laterally rounded and dorsally wide. <b>Mesosoma</b> (Fig. 142 A–C, E). Mesosoma dorsoventrally convex. Mesoscutum proximally convex and distally flat, punctation distinct throughout, interspaces wavy/lacunose. Scutellum triangular, apex sloped and fused with BS, scutellar punctation scattered throughout, in profile scutellum flat and on same plane as mesoscutum, phragma of the scutellum partially exposed; BS only very partially overlapping the MPM; ATS demilune with quite a little complete parallel carinae; dorsal ATS groove with carinae only proximally. Transscutal articulation with small and heterogeneous foveae, area just behind transscutal articulation with a smooth and shiny sloped transverse strip. Metanotum with BM wider than PFM (clearly differentiated); MPM circular and bisected by a median longitudinal carina; AFM with a small lobe and not as well delineated as PFM; PFM thick and smooth; ATM proximally with a groove with some sculpturing and distally smooth. Propodeum without median longitudinal carina, proximal half straight or nearly so with medium-sized sculpture and distal half relatively polished; distal edge of propodeum with a flange at each side and without stubs; propodeal spiracle without distal carina; nucha surrounded by very short radiating carinae. Pronotum with a distinct dorsal furrow, dorsally with a well-defined smooth band; central area of pronotum smooth, but both dorsal and ventral furrows with short parallel carinae. Propleuron with fine punctations throughout and dorsally without a carina. Metasternum flat or nearly so. Contour of mesopleuron straight/angulate or nearly so; precoxal groove deep, smooth and shiny; epicnemial ridge elongated more fusiform (tapering at both ends). <b>Legs.</b> Ventral margin of fore telotarsus entire without seta, fore telotarsus almost same width throughout and longer than fourth tarsomere (0.11, 0.06). Dorsal half of hind coxa with scattered punctation and ventral half with dense punctation, and dorsal outer depression present. Inner spur of hind tibia longer than outer spur (0.21, 0.16). Entire surface of hind tibia with dense strong spines clearly differentiated by color and length. Hind telotarsus as equal in length as fourth tarsomere (0.10, 0.09). <b>Wings</b> (Fig. 142J, K). Fore wing with r vein straight; 2RS vein straight; r and 2RS veins forming an angle at their junction and outer side of junction forming a slight stub; 2M vein slightly curved/swollen; distally fore wing [where spectral veins are] with microtrichiae more densely concentrated than the rest of the wing; anal cell 1/3 proximally lacking microtrichiae; subbasal cell with a small smooth area; veins 2CUa and 2CUb completely spectral; vein 2 cu-a absent; vein 2-1A proximally tubular and distally spectral, although sometimes difficult to see; tubular vein 1 cu-a curved and complete, but junction with 1-1A vein spectral. Hind wing with vannal lobe very narrow, subdistally and subproximally straightened, and setae evenly scattered in the margin. <b>Metasoma</b> (Fig. 142A, D, F–I). Metasoma laterally compressed. Petiole on T1 finely sculptured only distally, evenly narrowing distally (length 0.31, maximum width 0.15, minimum width 0.08) and with scattered pubescence concentrated in the first distal third. Lateral grooves delimiting the median area on T2 clearly defined and reaching the distal edge of T2 (length median area 0.14, length T2 0.14), edges of median area obscured by weak longitudinal stripes, median area broader than long (length 0.14, maximum width 0.17, minimum width 0.07); T2 with scattered pubescence only distally. T3 longer than T2 (0.20, 0.14) and with scattered pubescence only distally. Pubescence on hypopygium dense. <b>Cocoons.</b> White bud-like cocoon with body ridge-shaped and evenly smooth silk fibers. Cocoons lightly adhered to each other and adhered to the larval cuticle, in litter or soil. Comments. The coloration of the adjacent area on T2 is lighter. In some females, the sterna coloration differs a little: S1 yellow, but medially is brown, S4 proximal half yellow and distal half brown. Male (Fig. 143 A–L). Similar coloration and shape to females. Etymology. Lubomir (Lubo) Masner is a Czech-born entomologist. He is the world specialist in the systematics of proctotrupoid parasitioid wasps. Currently, he is an honorary research associate at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Distribution. The parasitized caterpillars were collected in Costa Rica, ACG, Sector Pitilla (Pasmompa and Sendero Memos) and Sector San Cristóbal (Tajo Ángeles), during April 2005, March 2007, and March 2011 at 440 m, 540 m, and 740 m in rain forest. Biology. The lifestyle of this parasitoid species is gregarious. Host. <i>Ithomia hippocrenis</i> Bates (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae) feeding on <i>Witheringia solanacea</i> (Solanaceae) and <i>Mechanitis isthmia</i> (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae) feeding on <i>Solanum hayesii</i> (Solanaceae). Caterpillars were collected in second and third instar.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,736
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0660,020

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEntomological Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207