Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2011, NESCent continued to expand its programs, introducing new activities (e.g., the Darwin Day Roadshow and the Evolution Film Festival, and a journalist-in-residence program), and bringing to fruition activities that were initiated in 2010 (e.g., the NESCent Ambassador Program and the NESCent Academy, as well as cross- center meetings for postdoctoral fellows and for cyberinfrastructure). The NESCent Oversight Committee met for the first time, bringing together senior administrators from the partner institutions. The focus at that meeting – and indeed, at NESCent for most of this year – was NESCent’s future after NSF funding ceases in 2014. Of relevance to these discussions is the fact that NESCent continues to enjoy the evolutionary science community’s endorsement. Likewise, the partner institutions recognize that sustaining NESCent is important. For its part, NESCent has stepped up its engagement with the partner institutions, capitalizing on the skills and collaborative networks of faculty at these institutions. In an effort to develop a strategy for sustainability, NESCent is developing a business plan for review in the first quarter of 2012 by the Oversight Committee. This year saw a few staff changes, with Phillip Grosshans joining NESCent as our new Assistant Director for Administration. Todd Vision began his sabbatical in the second half of 2011, and Joel Kingsolver presently acts as the Associate Director of Informatics. Other staff losses, particularly in IT, have been challenging, and we expect that this situation will not improve as we head towards 2014. Recognizing that 2014 is going to be a watershed year for NESCent, we move into 2012 preparing to deal with transition, and equip staff with skills to compete in the workforce. NESCent’s visibility within the broader evolutionary science community continues to grow. In 2011, we had more than 77,000 visitors from 176 countries to our website (up from 66,000 visitors from 54 countries last year). Also, in 2011, more than 65 news articles on NESCent science appeared in the mainstream media, including Science Magazine, NPR, Scientific American, Discovery Channel, Wired, The New York Times, and TIME Magazine (up from 40 news articles for last year). In September 2011, NESCent also launched its new website. This year, NESCent submits a proposal to host the 2014 Joint Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution, the Society for Systematic Biology, and the American Society of Naturalists (Evolution 2014). The plan is to hold the meeting at the Raleigh Convention Center in June 2014. NESCent is working with an organizing committee drawn from faculty at Duke University, UNC-Chapel Hill, NCSU, UNC-Greensboro, and East Carolina University. If NESCent’s proposal is accepted, it will provide an opportunity to celebrate 10 years of synthetic evolutionary science, and acknowledge the support that the evolutionary science community has given to the Center.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,089 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle