Diolcogaster claritibia in Palaearctic 1959
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Diolcogaster claritibia (Papp, 1959) (Figs 5–6, 16 D–16E) Microgaster claritibia Papp, 1959: 405. Protomicroplitis orontes Nixon, 1965: 254. Protomicroplitis claritibia; Nixon, 1968: 69. Diolcogaster claritibia; Fernández-Triana et al. 2014b. Material examined. 11 ♀ (DPPZ): 1♀, IRAN, Sistan-o Baluchestan province, Mirjaveh county (29°00' N; 61°27' E, 851 m), 08.vii.2011, swept from Medicago sativa, S. Seddighi; 1 ♀, Kerman province, Jiroft county, Karimabad village (28°40’N; 57°44’E, 687 m), 06.iv.2012, pan trap among citrus trees, N. Amirinasab; 1 ♀, same label data, 03.iv.2014, swept from Cucumis sativus, N. Amirinasab; 2 ♀, Sistan-o Baluchestan province, Zabol county, (31°07'15" N; 61°30'12" E, 482 m), 20.iv.2013, swept from weeds, Z. Rahmani; 4 ♀, North Khorasan province, Maneh county, (37°40'0.33"N; 57°11'43.08"E, 703 m), 07.v.2014, Malaise trap in natural ecosystem, Z. Rahmani; 1 ♀, same label data, but 03.v.2014, swept from weeds, Z. Rahmani; 1 ♀, same label data, but 08.v.2014. Additional material. 9 ♀ and 4 ♂ (HNHM, all determined by J. Papp, otherwise indicated): HOLOTYPE of Microgaster claritibia, ♀, HUNGARY, Domos, on Lepidium, Apajpuszta (47°6'N, 19°5'E), 7.v.1952, A. Moczar, Hym. Typ. No. 451, Museum Budapest (Fig. 16D); 1 ♀, Paratype, same label data, Hym. Typ. No. 450, Museum Budapest, Det.: G.E.J. Nixon, 1958 as Microgaster claritibia (Fig. 16E); 1 ♀, SPAIN, 5.x.1983; 1 ♀, Canary Islands, La Gomera, San Sebastian (43°19'N, 1°58'W), 17.iii.1950, M. Lindberg; 1 ♀, TUNISIA, Tunis, Carthago (36°51'N, 10°19'E); 1 ♀ and 3 ♂, TURKEY, Adana (36°59'N, 35°19'E), 20.vi.1979, A. Beyarslan; 2 ♀, Aetep, Oguzeli (36°57'N, 37°30'E), 7.v.1995, A. Beyarslan; 1 ♀, UKRAINE, Sudl, Umg. Berdiansk (47°6'N, 37°26'E), 2.v.1966, N. Gulinov; 1 ♂, Kiev, airport (50°20'N, 30°53'E), 18.v.1975, S. Toth; 7 ♀ (NHMW): “ Allotype ” of Microgaster claritibia, ♀, AUSTRIA, Rechnitz Bgld (47°18'N, 16°26'E), 2.viii.1958, M. Fischer; 1 ♀, Wien III (48°12'N, 16°23'E), 16.vii.1958, M. Fischer; 1 ♀, same label data, 11.vi.1958; 4 ♀, same label data, 15.vi.1958. Redescription. FEMALE. 5 ♀ (Iran), length of body 2.0– 2.3 mm (Fig. 5A), length of antenna 2.2–2.5 mm (Fig. 5B), length of fore wing 2.1–2.4 mm (Figs 6 F–6G). Colour. Antenna brownish black (Fig. 5B); medio-tergites 4–8 darker than latero-tergites and mostly dark brown or blackish brown (Fig. 6D); all coxae black, metafemora dark brown, pro- and mesotibia entirely yellow, metatibia yellow anteriorly, brown medially and dark brown posteriorly about 0.8 (Figs 5A, 5C). Head. Head height 4.5× temple length (Figs 5 E–5F); subapical antennal flagellomeres somewhat moniliform and longer than wide, length of second, 12th, 13th, 14th, penultimate and apical flagellomeres 2.0, 2.3, 2.2, 2.0, 2.1 and 2.4× as long as their width, respectively (Fig. 5B); gena in lateral view slightly smaller than eye width (Fig. 5F); malar space medium-sized (Fig. 5D); clypeal maximum width 1.6× oculo-mandibular line (Fig. 5D); interocular line 3.5× oculo-mandibular line (Fig. 5D); eye height 2.6× its width, 2.1× temple length and 3.4× oculomandibular line (Figs 5 D–5E); OD and POL 0.5× and 1.1× OOL, respectively (Figs 5E). Mesosoma. Mesoscutum finely and densely punctate, with whitish setae (Fig. 6A); scutellum weakly and sparsely punctate (Fig. 6A); propodeum shiny, rugose posteriorly and laterally, the rest largely smooth with an irregular medio-longitudinal carina, traces of transverse carina defined with rugose pattern, length of anterior half of propodeum 1.2× of posterior half of propodeum (Fig. 6D). Legs. Metacoxa large, 2.8× as long as wide, not surpassing posterior margin of T2 (Fig. 5A); metafemora 3.7× as long as wide and 1.8× length of metatibia (Figs 5A, 5C); metatibial inner spur 0.5× as long as basitarsus (Fig. 5C). Wings (Figs 5 F–5G). Fore wing vein R1 about 0.8× pterostigma length, pterostigma 2.5× as long as wide, vein r 1.0× as long as vein 2RS, not curved, vein r-m 1.8× 3RSa, subbasal cell less than half as long as vein 1M. Hind wing evenly covered with brown setae, vein cu-a curved. Metasoma. T1 medial length 1.9× its width anteriorly, 1.5× its width posteriorly (Fig. 6C), anterior half of T1 parallel-sided, then widening towards posterior margin, T1 with a median sulcus, anterior half smooth and shiny, sparsely punctate, posterior half with strong rugae and medium-sized setae (Fig. 6C); T2 with a median field, well protruding, laterally weakly sloping, its width 3.5× medial length at posterior margin, T2 with weak rugae medially, smooth and shiny laterally (Figs 6 C–6D); T3 longer than T2 and completely smooth (Fig. 6D); setose part of ovipositor sheaths 0.3× as long as metatibia (Fig. 6E). Ecological notes. No hosts known in Iran. It was reared from Plutellidae (Yu et al. 2016). Flight period March to October, with peak in May. Mostly collected in April and May. Distribution in Iran. Golestan (Gadallah et al. 2015); Sistan-o Baluchestan, Kerman and North Khorasan provinces (new records). Geographic distribution (Figs 17 B–17C). Holarctic: Afghanistan, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario), Finland, former Yugoslavia, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia (Chita, Krasnodar Krai), Spain, Tunisia (new record), Turkey and Ukraine (new record). Similar species. The most similar species is D. tegularia (Papp, 1959) from Hungary and D. mayae (Shestakov, 1932), which can be easily separated by a series of diagnostic characters (Table 3). MALE. Unknown from Iran. Remarks. Our examined specimens were similar to specimens from Cyprus, France and Jordan, listed in Fernandez-Triana et al. (2014) and differ from Canadian specimens by the sculpture of T1–T2, mesoscutum and scutellum, the shape of the median field of T2 and the length/width ratio of T1. Generally, the examined specimens combine morphological characteristics of both European and Canadian specimens. In addition, we observed some intraspecific variations, e.g., specimens identified by J. Papp have only fore legs light yellow and the other legs black, while the Iranian specimens have all legs tricoloured, dark brown (coxae), brown (femora and tarsi) and yellowish brown (tibiae).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».