MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968658715 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5025889

Liogenys clipeosetosa Cherman 2021, new species

2021· article· en· W6968658715 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeParatypeType localityGenus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Liogenys clipeosetosa Cherman, new species Figs. 2, 9. Type material. Holotype male, labeled: [green typeset] “ Venezuela / F. Kummerow S.”, [red typeset and handwritten] “ LIOGENYS / CLIPEOSETOSA / HOLOTYPE / Cherman M. A. ”, genitalia mounted (ZMHB). Paratypes (10) all bearing the label [yellow, typeset and handwritten] “ LIOGENYS / CLIPEOSETOSA / PARATYPE / Cherman M. A.”. Six female paratypes bearing the same data of the holotype (ZMHB). Three female paratypes with the label: [green, outlined, typeset] “Hist. Coll. (Coleoptera) / Nr. 24131 / Liogenys quadridens Burm. / Columb., Moritz. / Zool. Mus. Berlin” (ZMHB). One female paratype with the data: [white, typeset] “ VENEZUELA: Lara / 20 km.E. Carora / 24-VI-1976 / Holotype and nine paratypes deposited at ZMHB. One paratypes at USNM. Additional material. Three females (FSCA) were port interceptions from Gulfport, Mississippi, United States of America in Musa (Musaceae) (bananas, plantains, etc.) originating from Colombia. We examined photographs of these specimens provided by John Leavengood (United States Department of Agriculture, Tampa, Florida, United States of America). No specific locality was available within Colombia and it is likely that these specimens were attracted to lights during the packing or loading of this commodity. Diagnosis. Body light brown; elongate (Fig. 2A–B), elytra light brown to yellowish brown, pronotum reddish brown, head darker; clypeus quadridentate; clypeal emargination deep, rounded, and wide; anterior teeth sometimes twice the length of the lateral teeth (Fig. 2C); distance between lateral and anterior clypeal teeth longer than basal width of one anterior tooth; angle between lateral and anterior clypeal teeth 90º or acute; clypeus and part of the frons with bristles; pronotum roughly punctate; pronotal corners rounded or subangulate; mesotibia quadrate in cross section (Fig. 2D); pygidium flat or slightly convex, depressed medially (Fig. 2E–F), pygidial disc with short bristles throughout, bristles longer on apex; males with protarsomere II up to twice the length of protarsomere I in dorsal view; parameres elongate, inner margins straight; lateral expansion along the parameres length entirely visible in dorsal view; apex harpoon-shaped, lateral spine projected backwards, slightly convergent compared to the outer margin of the parameres; spine length slightly longer than the apex, subapical and part of the apex not elevated on midline (Figs. 1E, 2G). Holotype. Male. Length: 12.0 mm, width: 5.8 mm. Light brown. Head: darker than pronotum, distance between eyes less than twice the width of one eye; frons equal in length to clypeus; frontoclypeal surface with bristles, clypeal emargination deep, rounded, and wide; outer sides of anterior teeth parallel; outer margin of anterior teeth shorter than the eye in dorsal view; clypeus convex laterally and strongly produced forming a conspicuous, tooth-like projection; distance between lateral and anterior teeth longer than basal width of one anterior tooth, distance between lateral tooth and anterior margin of eye equal to one eye length, angle between anterior and lateral teeth approximately 90º; canthus not exceeding the outer margin of the eye; distal maxillary palpomere, maximum width more than twice the width at apex; fovea shallow, extending past the transverse midline of the palpomere; antenna with 10 antennomeres, club lighter in color and longer than funicle. Thorax: pronotal anterior margin slightly produced medially, undulate and flanged; anteriorly and on posterolateral surface depressed, sulcate medially; pronotal disc glabrous, punctures sparse medially and rugose on anterior margin; pronotal posterior corners rounded; hypomere with few long bristles; mesepisternum scaly; anterior portion and sides of metaventrite with bristles; distance between mesocoxae and metacoxae nearly twice the width of the metacoxa; scutellum ogival, sparse punctures. Elytra: shiny, uniform yellowish brown, lighter in color than pronotum; elytra near three times the length of pronotum; elytral suture slightly darker than elytron and not elevated; all four elytral ridges weakly defined. Legs: procoxa with long bristles on infra-carinal surface, fine scales and short bristles on outer surface; three protibial teeth, middle and apical teeth equal in size, distance between basal and middle teeth longer than between middle and apical teeth; mesofemur with a row of long bristles on anterior and posterior margins, mesotibia quadrate in cross section, surface coarsely sculptured, mesotibia with two transverse carinae, the apical carina incomplete; metacoxa with bristles throughout; basal articular lobe of metacoxa produced beyond the outer margin of trochanter; inner margin of metatibia carinate and produced on apex, apical inner surface with scattered bristles, metatibial surface coarsely sculptured; metatibial transverse carina and discontinuous longitudinal carina present posteriorly; protarsomere II elongate; protarsomeres and mesotarsomeres I–IV enlarged, protarsomeres slightly wider than mesotarsomeres, more than twice the width of metatarsomeres; metatarsomere I and metatarsomere II equal in length; claw bifid, symmetrical, outer tooth of a claw longer and as wide as the inner tooth; distance between teeth shorter than the inner tooth. Abdomen: disc of ventrites with sparse bristles; propygidium with bristles, pygidium flat, subtrapezoidal, wide, pygidial width exceeding distance between spiracles of propygidium; pygidial disc glabrous except for a few bristles on apex, pygidial disc coarsely punctate; depressed medially; pygidial apex quadrate. Parameres: basal region slightly wider than both sections of the parameres at its midline; parameral split at 2/3 the length of the basal region; inner margins straight; lateral expansion along the parameres length entirely visible in dorsal view; apex harpoon-shaped, laterally expanded and blunt projected. Parameres concave in lateral view (Fig. 2H). Variation. Female paratypes. Length: 11.2–12.6 mm; width 5.4–6.3 mm. As the holotype except pygidial apex rounder, wider and somewhat convex, not depressed medially. Some females have the clypeal teeth noticeable longer. One female from Venezuela has a subtrapezoidal pygidium. Etymology. Adjective in the nominative singular. From the Latin clipeus (clypeus) + Latin setosus, from seta (“bristle”). Type locality. Venezuela. Geographical distribution. COLOMBIA, VENEZUELA (Lara). Remarks. Liogenys clipeosetosa Cherman, new species resembles L. quadridens in the body color and size, shape of the quadridentate clypeus, pygidium, and somewhat in the shape of the male parameres. Liogenys clipeosetosa differs (L. quadridens in parenthesis) in the clypeus with bristles (clypeus glabrous), fovea of the distal maxillary palpomere shallow, surface almost flat (fovea deep); pronotal anterior margin flanged (flange less conspicuous or absent); pronotum depressed anteriorly and on posterolateral surface, sulcate medially (not as so); pronotal disc roughly punctate mainly on anterior margin (pronotal disc less coarse and uniformly punctate); males with the protarsomere II longer than wide (as wide as it is long); apex of parameres entirely flat and lateral expansion along the parameres length entirely visible in dorsal view (subapical and proximal part of the apex elevated medially and lateral expansion of parameres partially hidden, visible from the midline up to the subapical portion).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionTravaux en français237 207