Procladius (Holotanypus) culiciformis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Procladius (Holotanypus) culiciformis (L.) (Figs 4; 5; 12 C,I;13C; 14 B, F, K) Tipula culiciformis Linnaeus, 1767: 978. Tanypus crassinervis Zetterstedt, 1838: 817. Prothenthes claripennis Malloch 1915: 387. Procladius choreus Edwards (in part), 1929: 301. Procladius (Procladius) culiciformis (L.); Roback 1971: 175, 1980: 38; Saether 1977: 48. Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, 2 km off Selkirk (Horse) Island, 2 males, 4.vi. 1969; 4 km off Grand Rapids, 1 male, 8.vi. 1969; 0.5 km off George Island, 21 males, 11–12.vi. 1969; 3 km off Grand Rapids, 1 male, 13.vi. 1969; 10 km off (Sturgeonskin point) Long Point, 1 male, 15.vi. 1969; 3 km off McCreary Island, 20 males, 15.vi. 1969; Gimli Government Wharf, 41 males, 24.vi. 1969; 3 km off George Island, 6 males, 27.vi.1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 14 males, 28.vi. 1969; 5 km off Selkirk (Horse) Island, 2 males, 29.vi. 1969; McBeth Harbor, 4 males, 30.vi. 1969; Mukutawa River Buoy, 1 male, 3.ix. 1969; Beaver Point, 7 males, 9.vi. 1971; 20 Mile Creek, 5 males, 26.viii. 1971; Old Fishing Dock, 20 males, 5. & 27.viii. 1971; reared from pupa: north of outer buoy of Red River, 1 male, 4.vi. 1969; 13 km SW Bigstone Point, 1 male, 11.vi. 1969; 26 km east north-east of Grand Rapids, 1 male, 13.vi. 1969; north-northeast of Reindeer Island, 1 female, 15.vi. 1969; 13 km southeast of Bigstone Point, 1 male, 3.ix. 1969; outer buoy of Red River, 1 male, 17.iii. 1970; off Grand Marais Point, 1 male, 17.iii. 1970; South Basin, 396 larvae, 1 pupa, 4.vi–31.x.1969; Narrows, 152 larvae, 1 pupa, 4.vi–31.x.1969; North Basin, 182 larvae, 4.vi–31.x.1969. The males of the Lake Winnipeg population (Fig. 4) conform well to the description given by Roback (1971: 177). The only exception is one male with the indication of an anal point (Fig 4 D). This may only be a deformity possibly caused by mermithid infection or it may indicate that an additional species close to P. culiciformis is present. The female has 6–8 setae on anepisternum II, segment X with 20–30 setae, and 3–8 sensilla chaetica on each ta1 of p2 and p3. Pupa (n = 10) Cephalothorax. Thoracic horn (Fig.12 C) 350–515, 430 µm long [518–547 µm in Roback (1980)]; 103–160, 119 µm wide; plastron plate diameter 62–104, 94 µm; apical constriction of horn chamber 24–65, 42 µm wide; length/width of horn 3.22–3.96, 3.64; width of plastron plate /width of horn 0.61–0.76, 0.67[0.50–0.57in Roback (1980)]; width of plastron plate/ width of constriction 1.88–3.08, 2.15. Abdomen. Anal lobe (Fig. 12 I) with 42–62, 50 spines on outer margin and 7–12, 10 spines on inner margin; dense row of relatively short spines posterolaterally. Fourth instar larva (n = 10, except when otherwise stated) Head capsule length 650–810, 757 µm (622) [580–680 µm in Moore & Moore (1978)]. Head. Antenna as in Fig. 13 C. Lengths of antennal segments 1–5 (µm): 155–176, 167; 16–21, 19; 4–7, 5; 2; 2. AR 5.17–6.84, 6.00 [4.2–6.0 in Moore & Moore (1978)]. Basal antennal segment 31–38, 36 µm wide; 4.31–5.15, 4.69 times as long as wide; ring organ 0.67–0.78, 0.73 from base; blade 23–31,26 µm long; accessory blade 18–26, 22 µm long. Apical style of second segment 6–10, 8 µm long. Mandible 162–178, 168 µm long [115–150 µm in Moore & Moore (1978), 192 µm in Roback (1980)]. Maxilla (Fig.14 B) with lamelles of palpifer divided ending in triangular lamelles broadest at apex; lamelles of galea apparently undivided or perhaps with some divided. Maxillary palp (Fig.14 F) 38–48, 42 µm long; 13–16, 14 µm wide; 1.90–2.33, 2.24 times as long as wide. Length of basal antennal segment/length of palp 3.60–4.40, 3.98. Hypopharyngeal pecten with 10–14, 11 teeth. Abdomen. Claws of posterior parapods (Fig.14 K) all relatively long and slender. Remarks. The anal lobe of the pupa differ from that illustrated by Roback (1980, fig. 178) by having several small spines on the inner margin. However, the inner margin is curved in the same way and Roback had few associated immatures. The immatures from Lake Lacawac, Pennsylvania, are larger than the Lake Winnipeg population, while those from the Great Slave Lake described by Moore & Moore (1978) are generally smaller. Distribution and ecology. The species was previously known from all over the Palaearctic Region except for North Africa, from the Near East, and in North America from Northwest Territories, British Columbia and Ontario to Kansas and Florida, California, Nevada and Arizona (Oliver et al. 1990: 15, Spies 1999, Saether & Spies 2004). The species is primarily a northern lake form. The distribution in Lake Winnipeg is shown in Fig. 1, the emergence pattern in Fig. 5.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».