MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968850100 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5667444

Ephesiella australiensis Hartmann-Schroder 1982

2015· article· en· W6968850100 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine and coastal plant biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNorthern territoryNorth westDarwin (ADL)West coastCharles darwin

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ephesiella australiensis Hartmann-Schröder, 1982 Figs 1 A–C, 2, 3, 4A–B, 5A–D Ephesiella australiensis Hartmann-Schröder, 1982: 80 –81, Figs 84–87. Material examined. Holotype: Cervantes, Western Australia, Australia. ZMH P.16773, sandy beach between Posidonia, 24 Oct 1975. Paratype: (1 spec.) same details. Additional material. Western Australia: AM W.42699 (1 spec.), North West Shelf, 19° 28' S, 118° 55' E, 39 m, 26 Apr 1983; AM W.42700 (1 spec.), 2 km west of Angel Island, Dampier Archipelago, 20° 29' 46" S, 116° 47' 29" E, 10 m, 0 4 Aug 2000, dead coral; AM W.42701 (2 specs, one for SEM), Angel Island, Dampier Archipelago, 20° 27' 41" S, 116° 47' 31" E, 14 m, 0 5 Aug 2000, dead coral; AM W.42702 (2 specs, one for SEM), south west Enderby Island, 20° 37' 18" S, 116° 27' 23" E, 14 m, 0 8 Aug 2000, dead coral; AM W.42703 (2 specs), north west end Legendre Island, 20° 21' 13" S, 116° 50' 26" E, 21 m, 30 Jul 2000, dead coral; AM W.42704 (4 specs), 1 km north east of Delambre Island, Dampier Archipelago, 20° 25' 43" S, 117° 05' 07" E, 14 m, 0 7 Aug 2000; NMV F.162479 (1 spec.), off Pelsart Island, near Geraldton, 29° 00' 10" S, 113° 46' 26" E, 409 m, 0 1 Aug 2005. Northern Territory: NTM W.10209 (1 spec.), Darwin Harbour, 12° 29' 3" S, 130° 50' 10"E, 7m, 1993; NTM W.15191 (1 spec.), Darwin Harbour, 12° 23' 15" S, 130° 49 32' 6" E, 1994; NTM W.15197 (1 spec.), Darwin Harbour, 12° 28' 10" S, 130 46 '15" E, 5 m, 1994; NTM W.20663 (1 spec. for SEM), Arafura Sea, 18° 22' 30" S, 133° 41' 48" E, 187 m, 2005; NTM W.24312 (1 spec.), Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, NT, Australia, 12° 20' 56" S, 129° 58' 40" E, 44 m, 2009; Queensland: AM W.202140 (2 specs), near mouth of Althaus Creek, Halifax Bay, north of Townsville, 19° 10' S, 146° 37' E, Jul 1977; AM W.42693 (1 spec. for SEM); New South Wales: AM W.28133 (1 spec.), east of Wollongong, 34° 28' S, 151° 02' E, 100 m, 28 Mar 1994, in Globigerina; AM W.42688 (1 spec. for SEM), Cape Three Points, south-east of Third Point, 33° 31' 55" S, 151° 24' 58" E, 30 m, 0 6 May 2007, sand from around large boulders; AM W.42711 (1 spec.), Bass Point, 34° 36' S, 150° 54' E, 65 m, 25 Jun 1990; AM W.42712 (1 spec.), same details; AM W.42728 (3 specs), east of Malabar, 33° 58' 41" S, 151° 18' E, 81.4 m, 23 Aug 1995. Victoria: NMV F.132625 (1 spec.), 43 km SE of Port Albert, Eastern Bass Strait, 38° 53' 42" S, 147° 06' 30" E, 58 m, 18 Nov 1981; NMV F.132637 (1 spec.), 63 km E of North Point, Flinders Island Eastern Bass Strait, 39° 44' 48" S, 148° 40' 36" E, 124 m, 14 Nov 1981; NMV F.132642 (1 spec. for SEM), 50 km SW of Warrnambool, Western Bass Strait, 38° 49' 30"S, 142° 35' 24"E, 89 m, 21 Nov 1981. Diagnosis. Microtubercles absent or present on first chaetigers. Palps and lateral antennae digitiform, median antenna spherical. Tentacular cirri ellipsoid or inconspicuous. Eyes not observed. Parapodia with 4–6 parapodial papillae; compound or semi-compound chaetae with blades 1.5–2.5 times as long as maximum width on mid-body chaetigers; hooks absent or present on first chaetiger. Re-description. Measurements and general morphology. Holotype 1.4 mm long, 0.4 mm wide, with 18 chaetigers. Body elongated, sub-quadrangular in section, with slightly convex dorsum. Anterior end bluntly rounded, slightly narrowing along posterior segments. Segmentation inconspicuous, tegument with transverse wrinkles. Preserved specimen lacking pigmentation. Head. Prostomium with five short appendages, including a pair of digitiform palps in ventral-most position, a pair of lateral antennae, similar in shape and size to palps, and a median antenna, shorter (one third) than lateral antennae and resembling a large semi-spherical papilla (Figs 1 A–B, 2A–B, 3A, G). Two rounded small papillae between palps, two between median and lateral antennae and two between lateral antennae and mouth (Figs 1 A, 2B). A pair of tentacular cirri similar in shape and size to lateral antennae and palps and several scattered papillae similar to prostomial (Fig. 2 B). Tubercles. First chaetiger with two dorsal macrotubercles; microtubercles absent (Figs 2 A, 3G). Following chaetigers each with two dorsal macrotubercles arranged in two dorso-lateral longitudinal rows, and two microtubercles forming two longitudinal rows between the macrotubercles (Figs 2 C, 4A). Macrotubercles sessile and spherical, each provided with a digitiform terminal papilla (Figs 1 A, 2A, C, D, 3B, D); with groups of pores around terminal papilla (Fig. 2 D). All macrotubercles similar in shape and size, slightly increasing in size to chaetiger 4 and decreasing in posterior chaetigers. Microtubercles with digitiform terminal papillae shorter (Fig. 1 C), or longer (Figs 2 A, C, E, 3B, H) than collar. Spherical papillae over dorsum, arranged in three transversal rows per chaetiger, with around 15–20 papillae on each mid-body chaetigers, including 2–3 papillae between macrotubercles and parapodia (Figs 2 C, 4A). Ventral surface with spherical papillae, arranged in four more or less regular transversal rows, with a total of 20–25 per segment, in mid-body; numbers decreasing towards posterior end (Figs 3 I, 4B). Body epithelium with ellipsoid granules (e.g. Fig. 3 F). Parapodia. Parapodia sub-conical, increasing in size towards chaetiger 3, around 1–2 times longer than wide; acicular lobe projecting distally anterior to chaetae, resembling other parapodial papillae or slightly longer, ventral cirri bottle-shaped projecting as long as acicular lobe (Figs 2 A, C–D, F–G, 3B, E–F, I–J). Anterior parapodia with four hemispherical papillae: one anterior, one anterio-ventral, one anterior dorsal and one posterior, in addition to the acicular lobe. Mid-body parapodia with six semi-spherical papillae, all similar in size, in addition to the acicular lobe: one anterior dorsal, one anterior, near the acicular lobe, one anterior ventral, two posterio-dorsal (one of them distal) (Figs 2 F–G, 3E, J, 5A–D). Chaetae. First chaetiger apparently with hooks absent. Compound or semi-compound chaetae in all chaetigers, arranged in a curved transverse row around acicular lobe and numbering 4–6 per fascicle (Figs 2 F, G, 3E, F). First and second chaetigers with well serrated long blades, 5–6 times longer than wide (Fig. 2 H). Chaetae from chaetiger 3 with shafts widened distally, a larger distal tooth and fine spinulation; blades twice as long as wide, recurved and with smooth or few serration of the inner edges, with dorso-ventral gradation in the width and length (Fig. 2 I–J, 3C, K–L). Pygidium. Pygidium terminal, with mid-ventral digitiform anal cirrus and a pair of dorsal anal cirri, similar in shape but slightly smaller than macrotubercles (Fig. 2 E). Internal features. Eyes or muscular pharynx not observed. Reproductive features. Gametes or ‘copulatory organs’ not observed on either type or additional material. Some gravid females (e.g. NMV F.132637) are completely filled with discoid eggs, 250 µm of diameter. Variation. The holo- and the paratype are the smallest individuals reported. Other preserved specimens range between 2.2 and 22 mm long, 0.2 and 1.8 mm wide and had between 30 and 64 chaetigers. The relative length of the prostomial antennae is constant among specimens, palps and lateral antennae are similar in shape and size, and larger than median antenna. Some specimens have small or even inconspicuous tentacular cirri while these are digitiform and clearly visible in others. Differences in the absence/presence of microtubercles on the first chaetiger have been observed even within type material (the paratype bears microtubercles on first chaetiger). Chaetae also showed variation among the material examined. Some specimens from Northern Territory bear hooks on first chaetiger (Fig. 3 A) and most specimens, regardless their origins, bear semi-compound chaetae with joined shaft and blade although recognisable (e.g. Fig. 3 C, F, L). Diversity in the relative length/width of the blades was also observed within (Fig. 2 H–J) and among specimens (being the Northern Territory specimens the one presenting longer blades, Fig. 3 C). Moreover, a few specimens collected from Victoria, show enlarged macrotubercles with embedded microtubercles and some papillae, what is interpreted as an artefact due to swollen macrotubercles (Fig. 5 D). The number (4–6) and arrangement of parapodial papillae show little variation among specimens (Fig. 5 A– D). Remarks. This species was originally described based on the combination of the following features: absence of eyes, absence of hooks on first chaetiger, median antenna shorter than lateral, 4–5 parapodial papillae and compound chaetae with blades 1.5–2 times as long as maximum width (Hartmann-Schröder 1981). The specimens collected along the Australian coast mostly fit on this description but present slight variation on other morphological traits, as indicated above, not congruent with particular geographical patterns. It is therefore difficult, at this stage, to determine if there are more than one Ephesiella species present in Australia, despite the large geographical range and environmental diversity reported here for the species. The genus Ephesiella is a homogenous group of sphaerodorids currently with 15 species described and reported from around the world. The species boundaries and their diagnostic features need reassessment considering intraspecific variability which is not often taken into account (Desbruyères 1980; Hartmann-Schröder 1981). For the time being, all the specimens collected in Australia have been considered as a single entity but this hypothesis should be tested, desirably with molecular data. Type locality. Cervantes, Western Australia (Fig. 15). Distribution. Western Australia, Northern Territory, Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria (Hartmann- Schröder 1981; Wilson & Bakken 2003; Capa & Rouse 2015; Fig. 15). Habitat. Sand, sea-grass beds, dead coral, 10–400 m depth.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,037

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,165 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMarine and coastal plant biology→Travaux en français237 207→