MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968920742 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5714189

Mustela nigripes Linnaeus 1758

2009· article· en· W6968920742 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrairie dogMustela putoriusBurrowAdult maleBody weightWeasel

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

49. Black-footed Ferret Mustela nigripes French: Putois d’Amérique / German: Schwarzful3iltis / Spanish: Turon patinegro Taxonomy. Putorius nigripes Audubon & Bachman, 1851, Wyoming, USA. Monotypic. Distribution. Great Plains of USA (Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, Montana, New Mexico, South Dakota, Utah & Wyoming) and N Mexico. Descriptive notes. Head-body 40-50 cm, tail 11.4-15 cm; weight 964-1078 g (males), 764-854 g (females), adult males are larger than females. The Black-footed Ferret has a long body and short limbs. The pelage is yellowish-buff or beige with black hairs throughout; the underparts are paler. The forehead, muzzle, and throat are nearly white. The top of the head and middle of the back are brown. There is a distinctive, broad, horizontal black stripe across the face. The feet and terminal fourth of the tail are black. There are three pairs of mammae. Dental formula: 13/3, C 1/1, P3/3,M1/2=34 Habitat. Black-footed Ferrets are found on short/mid-grass prairies and semi-arid grasslands, in close association with prairie dogs. Food and Feeding. Black-footed Ferrets specialize in preying on prairie dogs (Cynomys), which they hunt by pursuing them inside their burrow systems. Occasionally, they may also eat other small mammals, such as microtine rodents and ground squirrels. One scat study revealed a diet that comprised 87% White-tailed Prairie Dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni), 6% mice, and 3% lagomorphs. Activity pattern. Primarily nocturnal, although daytime activity is not uncommon. Black-footed Ferrets are active throughout the year and continue to hunt prairie dogs during the winter, even though they are in hibernation. Prairie dog burrows are used as den/rest sites and may be modified for their own use. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Black-footed Ferrets are solitary, except during the breeding season. They seldom move from one prairie dog colony to another. The average nightly movement during winter is 1406 m. The average prairie dog town size occupied by a Black-footed Ferret is 8 ha, but the average size occupied by females with young is 36 ha (range = 10-120 ha). The mean distance between two towns occupied by Black-footed Ferrets is 5- 4 km. Population density in Wyoming was estimated to be one ferret per 50 ha of prairie dog colonies. Breeding. Mating occurs in March and April. Gestation lasts 42-45 days and births occur in May and June. Litter size can range from one to six; the average is three. The young emerge from the burrow in early July and separate from the mother in September or early October. Young males disperse a considerable distance, but young females often remain in the vicinity of their mother’s territory. Sexual maturity is attained by one year. Status and Conservation. Listed as Extinct in the Wild in 1996, but the success of conservation measures has changed their status to Endangered in The IUCN Red List. The Black-footed Ferret may once have been common in southern Canada (Alberta, and Saskatchewan), west-central USA (Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Arizona, and Texas), and northern Mexico. Destruction of prairie dog colonies for the sake of agriculture led to a decline in Black-footed Ferret numbers and eventually they became so rare that many people considered them to be extinct. However, unconfirmed sigh things continued from several states, and in 1981 a small population of Black-footed Ferrets was discovered in Wyoming. Intensive field studies were initiated, and byJuly 1984, the population was estimated to contain 129 individuals. However, the number of ferrets then began to fall, apparently due to a decline in their prairie dog prey; also, canine distemper was somehow introduced into the wild population. By 1987, the remaining 18 individuals were brought into captivity to start a breeding program. By 1991, there were 180 individuals in captivity and 49 ferrets were released into south-eastern Wyoming; 91 more were released in 1992, and another 48 in 1993. Most of these animals are thought to have died, but some are known to have survived and reproduced; at least six litters were born in the wild in 1993. Additional reintroductions were carried out in Montana, South Dakota, and Arizona. Today, they are known from 18 reintroduction efforts, only three of which are self sustaining. These self-sustaining populations are in South Dakota and Wyoming; four populations of limited success are in Arizona, Colorado, South Dakota, and Utah; eight populations recently introduced are in Arizona, Kansas, Montana, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Mexico; and three other declining or extirpated populations are in Montana. The current status of this species is still extremely precarious. Bibliography. Biggins et al. (1986), Campbell et al. (1987), Hillman & Clark (1980), IUCN (2008), Svendsen (2003), Vargas & Anderson (1998), Wozencraft (2005), Young et al. (2001).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,106

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0320,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesTravaux en français237 207