MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968997397 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6208270

Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Creplin, 1825) Seurat 1919

2010· article· en· W6968997397 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRidgeGroove (engineering)ClockwiseBody cavityTaxonomy (biology)SPINE (molecular biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Creplin, 1825) Seurat, 1919 Material studied: 12 males and 9 females; host: Larus argentatus Pontoppidan (Charadriiformes, Laridae); collected from Durankulak Lake, Bulgarian Black Sea coast (30 September 1990); site of infection: oesophagus. Vouchers: ZMB Vermes Entozoa 7461 (3 males and 2 females); CLGE-BAS N000.011 (7 males and 5 females); CLGE-BAS N001.068 (2 males), SEM stub; CLGE-BAS N001.069 (2 females), SEM stub. Description (Figs 5A–H; 6A–I) General. Medium-sized acuariids. Anterior end with two triangular pseudolabia, each bearing single amphid and pair of prominent papillae (Fig. 6C). Pair of swellings situated dorsally and ventrally at bases of pseudolabia. Few pores situated posteriorly to apex of pseudolabium (Fig. 6D). Cordons arise dorsally and ventrally between pseudolabia (Figs 5A, B; 6A, B); each cordon forming loop adjacent to its base and then continuing its course along longitudinal body axis; at level of posterior end of buccal cavity, cordons recurrent in anterior direction and reach level of anterior quarter of buccal cavity where they anastomose laterally (Fig. 5A, B). Cordons consisting of a single row of cuticular plates (each plate c. 2 µm long) and longitudinal cuticular ridge along outer rims of plates; deep longitudinal groove between plates and longitudinal ridge. Plates of both descending and ascending cordon arms of unequal width, thus forming scalloped appearance. Deirids 13–20 long, bicuspid (Fig. 6E). Postdeirids c. 5 long, bifurcate (Fig. 6F). Lateral alae well-developed, extending from level just posterior of deirids to level about middle of body (Fig. 6A, B). Buccal cavity elongate. Excretory pore posterior to deirids (Fig. 5A, B). Nerve ring surrounding anterior portion of muscular oesophagus. Phasmids subterminal (Fig. 6I). Male (from L. argentatus, n=10 except otherwise stated). Body length 9.8–11.3 mm (10.5 mm). Maximum body width 255–286 (271), about mid-body; width 98–136 (124) at level of cloaca. Tail 290–369 (325) long. Cordons 322–376 (350) long, recurrent in anterior direction to 97–170 (117) from anterior body end. Deirids and excretory pore at 384–434 (407) and 487–550 (506), respectively, from anterior body end. Left postdeirid and right postdeirid at 7.0– 8.1 mm (7.5 mm, n=7) and 6.1–7.1 mm (6.5 mm, n=7), respectively, from anterior body end. Buccal cavity 219–246 (231) long and 12–14 wide. Muscular oesophagus 848–940 (903) long and 61–72 (65) wide. Glandular oesophagus 2,927–3,640 (3,187) long and 104–120 (113) wide. Nerve ring at 376–434 (407) from anterior body end. Cuticle 14–16 thick. Distance between cuticular striations 5–6 μm. Lateral alae extending to 6.4–7.1 mm (6.7 mm) from anterior body end, maximum width 44–50. Caudal alae 561–1,062 (839) long. Single ventral cuticular ridge extending between level at 2,036– 2,775 (2,243) from posterior end and caudal alae (Fig. 6G). Single median sessile precloacal papilla present. Nine pairs of pedunculate caudal papillae, 4 precloacal and 5 postcloacal; postcloacal pairs with almost equal distance between them, fifth pair at posterior part of tail (Figs 5D; 6G, H). Sixth pair of postcloacal papillae sessile, smaller, situated between bases of last pedunculate papillae. Left spicule 487–548 (515) long and 9–10 wide, with projection on its distal end (Fig. 5F). Right spicule 142–167 (156) long and 24–26 (25) wide (Fig. 5H). I CL/BL 0.029–0.036 (0.034); I mOE/gOE 0.246–0.317 (0.285); I OE/BL 0.370–0.421 (0.391); I CA/BL 0.056–0.095 (0.080); I LSP/RSP 3.109–3.859 (3.333). Female (from L. argentatus, n=9 except otherwise stated). Body length 14.8–18.2 mm (16.6 mm). Maximum body width 402–456 (436), about mid-body; width 132–174 (150) at anus and 384–456 (414) at vulva. Cordons extending to 452–532 (490), recurrent in anterior direction to 97–122 (111) from anterior body end. Deirids and excretory pore at 474–590 (542) and 595–697 (639), respectively, from anterior body end. Left postdeirid and right postdeirid at 9.2–11.7 mm (10.6 mm) and 7.5–10.6 mm (9.3 mm) from anterior body end. Buccal cavity 456–519 (485) long, 14–17 (16) wide. Muscular oesophagus 1,055–1,284 (1,135) long, 70–89 (79) wide. Glandular oesophagus 3,922–4,375 (4,114) long, 147–182 (162) wide. Nerve ring at 469– 550 (515) from anterior body end. Cuticle 14–16 thick. Distance between striations 6–7 μm. Lateral alae extending to level of vulva, 43–48 wide. Vulva at 7.8–9.8 mm (9.0 mm) from anterior body end. Reproductive system didelphic. Vagina vera short, posteriorly directed, separated from vagina uterina by well-developed circular musculature (Fig. 5C). Vagina uterin а longer, with muscular walls. Posterior extremity of tail with button-like projection (Figs 5E; 6I). Eggs oval, 35–39 × 20–22 (37 × 21, n =20), containing first stage larva (Fig. 5G). I CL/BL 0.026–0.035 (0.030); I mOE/gOE 0.255–0.301 (0.276); I OE/BL 0.299–0.342 (0.316); I V/BL 0.520– 0.570 (0.543). Remarks. Anderson & Wong (1981) redescribed Cosmocephalus obvelatus and listed C. diesingi Molin, 1858, Cosmocephalus obvelatus magnus Vasil’kova, 1926, C. firlottei Rao, 1951, C. tanakai Rodrigues & Vicente, 1963 and C. faridi Khalil, 1931 as its junior synonyms. We consider that the synonymy of C. faridi (described from Pelecanus onocrotalus from Egypt) with C. obvelatus is not well-founded (see below). C. obvelatus is parasitic in a wide range of aquatic birds (see below) and its distribution is cosmopolitan (summarised from Anderson & Wong 1981; Baruš et al. 1978; Azuma et al. 1988; Smogorzhevskaya 1990; Diaz et al. 2001). The nematodes from Bulgaria identified here as C. obvelatus correspond with the known range of morphological variation of this species as presented in previous studies (e.g. Cram 1927; Rao 1951; Bowie 1981; Smogorzhevskaya 1990; Diaz et al. 2001). However, our specimens exhibit shorter spicules and tails compared with the material from Larus delawarensis from Canada (Table 1) described by Anderson & Wong (1981). An explanation of the differences in these characters requires further study. Our SEM observations are in agreement with results published by previous authors (Baruš & Majumdar 1975; Bowie 1981; Diaz et al. 2001; Frantová 2002). In addition to them, we describe the presence of a single ventral cuticular ridge situated anteriorly to the cloaca in male specimens (Fig. 6G, H). This structure was not mentioned in the previous descriptions of C. obvelatus but was documented in the illustrations of two articles (Diaz et al. 2001; Frantová 2002). We consider Cosmocephalus argentinensis Boero & Led, 1970 as a synonym of C. obvelatus. The former species was described on the basis of a single female nematode collected from Spheniscus magellanicus (Forster) (Spheniscidae) from La Plata Zoo, Argentina (Boero & Led, 1970). Its description, including the metrical data (Table 1), coincides with that of females of C. obvelatus. Recent studies have demonstrated high prevalence and intensities of infection of C. obvelatus in the same host species (Diaz et al. 2001; Pazos et al. 2003). Diaz et al. (2001) considered C. argentinensis as a species inquirenda.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,043

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetParasite Biology and Host Interactions→Travaux en français237 207→