Pelonaia corrugata Goodsir & Forbes 1841
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pelonaia corrugata Goodsir & Forbes, 1841 (Figures 4 B, 5, 6) Pelonaia corrugata Goodsir & Forbes, 1841. Forbes & Goodsir, 1841, pl.1 figs 1–3. Hartmeyer, 1903 and synonymy. Van Name, 1945 and synonymy. Material. Canada, Grande Riviere, collection Ledoyer, (MNHN S1 PEL 1). Few precise descriptions have been given of P. corrugata in spite of numerous specimens collected around the arctic and sub-antarctic seas. Several species names were given to this very common ascidian but the differences concerning the external aspect are considered non-significant (Hartmeyer 1903; Van Name 1945), varying with the contraction state or the substrate where they live. The most complete description until now is that of Van Name (1945), despite frequent further citations of collections made in various regions (Millar 1970; Nishikawa 1991 and synonymy; Sanamyan and synonymy 2010). Specimens of P. corrugata in the MNHN collections have been examined. Their anatomical description is based on the largest specimen 37mm long. The body is urn-shaped with both siphons joined at the narrow apical end (Fig. 5 A). The tunic has numerous transversal ridges impregnated with fine sediment and wears some short tunic filaments at the enlarge base (Fig.5 A). All specimens have the same aspect and seem to have been free-living on the sediment. The body wall contains strong muscular ribbons on the halfanterior part, and thinner ones posteriorly. The oral tentacles are short and filiform. The protruding dorsal tubercle opens in a simple hole. The branchial sac is flat, very contracted and linked to the body wall by numerous bridles; it does not reach the bottom of the body cavity. The dorsal lamina is long, undulated by contraction, with a smooth rim. I have counted 28 longitudinal vessels on the right side and 36 on the left side, not grouped in folds (Fig. 5 B). They are more numerous than the number indicated in the literature. The round or oval stigmata are often cut by parastigmatic vessels (Fig. 5 B). The gut loop is long but remains in a small part of the posterior left body side (Figs 4 B, 6AB).. The narrow and long oesophagus enters in a long plicated stomach which has a caecum at its pyloric part (Fig. 4 B). A caecum was also noted by Årnback-Christie-Linde (1952). The intestine is applied against the whole length of the stomach and then curves at the oesophagus level to follow the dorsal body line. The anus is lobed. The gut is only linked to the body wall by strands of tissue. The gonads (Figs 4 B, 6AB), one on each side, have a peculiar shape. They occupy the most part of the body wall surface. The ovary is U-shaped, each limb bordered on both sides by finger-like lobules pressed to each other and making a flat ribbon against the body wall (Fig.4A, 6 AB). The left gonad lies above the gut loop. The male and female papillae are joined and apical. Small endocarps are irregularly scattered on the posterior part of the body wall, inside the gut loop and few of them are intercalated between the male lobules of the gonads (Figs 4 B, 6). A triangular line of ramified tentacles is at the base of the atrial aperture and some filiform papillae arise from the internal lining of the siphon. The main differences between both species of Pelonaia concern the tunic structure, the number of branchial longitudinal vessels, the shape of the male vesicles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,107 | 0,043 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».