Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cactophagus dragoni Anderson (Figs. 710, 1518) Identification.— Cactophagus dragoni appears to be closely related to C. ornatus and C. sinuatus based on similarities in the placement of the antennae on the rostrum far from the eye (Fig. 15), the bilamellate apical portion of the peduncle of the postmentum which is somewhat projected anteriorly and ventrally, and the elytral maculations which (if present) distort the form of the elytal striae (Fig. 9). Most specimens of C. dragoni have elytra with orange humeri and a series of disjunct orange maculations extended in an oblique arc from the anterior onethird of the lateral elytal margin to the posterior onethird of the elytral length at interval 3 (Fig. 9). These maculations are tumescent and slightly distort the elytral striae. One immaculate conspecific specimen (near Boquete) is known (Figs. 7-8). Whereas similar, C. ornatus and C. sinuatus are not as markedly sculptured, have only a transverse subbasal pronotal impression, and the peduncle is not as sharply bilamellate as in C. dragoni. Description. Male, length, 13.8-15.3 mm; width, 5.8-6.5 mm. Female, length, 13.4- 14.4 mm; width, 6. 0-6.3 mm. Color black with elytral orange maculations at humeri, on Rostrum subequal to length pronotum; elongate, cylindrical, robust, evenly rather strongly curved, very coarsely, irregularly punctate basally, punctures somewhat finer, sparser apically; base of rostrum expanded slightly in dorsal view at point of antennal insertion only; in lateral view slightly wider at base but not obviously expanded, basal area long, about twofifths total rostral length. Rostrum glabrous ventrally; peduncle markedly bilamellate apically, projected anteriorly and ventrally. Scrobe with posterior margin about 6 or 7 times width of base of scape from anterior margin of eyes. Antenna with scape more or less onehalf length rostrum; club slightly laterally compressed, elongateoval; apical pilose part subequal to length basal glabrous part. Pronotum with lateral margins irregular, subparallel in basal onehalf, convergent subapically, tubulate to apex; disc and flanks moderately deeply irregularly punctate throughout, some punctures coalescent forming irregular shallow rugae; surface irregular, with shallow impressions laterally at midlength and deep transverse impression subbasally at middle; anterolateral margin immediately behind eyes with surface somewhat crenulate. Pronotum slightly longer than wide. Elytra with length one and onehalf times length pronotum; intervals finely punctate, irregularly creased; intervals 35 swollen and irregularly scupltured at base; striae with moderately deep, widely spaced, small punctures. Scutellum large, “V” shaped, length slightly longer than width at base, flat. Pygidium tumescent medially; shallowly regularly punctate throughout; apex broadly rounded, with transverse row of longer setae. Ventrally with front coxae very narrowly separated by no more than width of base of scape; prosternum markedly sloping between and anterior to front coxae, with low tubercle between coxae. Meso, metasternum and ventrite 1 irregularly sparsely punctate; ventrites 2 to 5 sparsely, finely punctate; last ventrite flat, glabrous. Legs moderately long, moderately densely regularly punctate, especially on outer face of femora; front coxae of male with inwardly projected low rounded swelling, lacking in female; femora clavate, moderately long, hind femur reaching apex of pygidium; inner margins of middle and hind tibiae very slightly inwardly expanded subbasally; all tibiae with very fine, uniformly short, stout, peglike setae throughout length arranged in pectinate manner. Tarsi with article 1 of front leg pilose on both lobes; third article very widely dilated, pilose ventrally except for narrow median line in basal onehalf; all tarsi with third articles symmetrical; apical margin of third articles very shallowly emarginate. Variation.—Some variation exists in the extent of the elytral orange maculations which are lacking on interval 4 and intervals 6 and 7 in some specimens, and one immaculate specimen (near Boquete) is known. Sexual dimorphism.—Sexes are difficult to separate in this species. Males have a slightly more concave metasternum and ventrite 1, and possess small tubercles on the front coxae. Material Examined.—Male HOLOTYPE labelled “Pan. Chiriqui Prov. / Cont'l Divide Trl. / 1115.V.1995 / Morris & Wappes" (CMNC). Female ALLOTYPE labelled " Panama. Chiriqui / Fortuna, 82°15'W / 8°44'N, May 20, 1978 / O'Briens & Marshall " (CWOB). PARATYPES (5, 3). PANAMA. CHIRIQUI PROVINCE. Boquete (5.6 km. W.), La Culebra Trail, 1450m, 19.vi.1996, J.Ashe & R. Brooks, Arum leaf axils, #178 (1). Continental Divide Trail, 1115.V.1995, Morris and Wappes (1). Fortuna, 82°15'W 8°44'N, May 20, 1978, O'Briens & Marshall (1). May 16, 1978 (2; 1). Reserva Forestal La Fortuna, Quebrada Aleman, 21.VII.1995, C.W. and L.B. O'Brien (1). Cuenca Fortuna, Aoki Camp, 23.V.1985, R. Flowers (1). Paratypes in CMNC, CWOB. Distribution.— Panama (Chiriqui). Natural history.—Adults have been collected in montane cloud forest in the La Fortuna area of Chiriqui province, Panama. The specimen from 5.6 km. W. Boquete was collected in the axil of a large arum plant (Araceae). Derivation of specific name.— Through support for the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after Jane Dragon of Fort Smith, Northwest Territories, Canada. Comments.—This species approaches species previously placed in Cactophagoides in the extent of pronotal and elytral sculpture. Such intermediate forms have led to the consideration of Cactophagoides as a junior synonym of Cactophagus.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».