Aristobatina udzungwa Marshall 2014, sp. n.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aristobatina udzungwa sp. n. Fig. 27 Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the type locality. Description: Length (head to wing tip): 16 mm. Colour: Chestnut brown to black, except for reddish postsutural area of notum and orange apices of mid and hind femora, orange area at apex of mid femur extensive, area at apex of hind femur small, not entirely encircling femur; fore and hind tibiae with small distomedial orange patch; basal 2.5 tarsomeres pale on fore and hind legs, white on fore tarsus; distal 2.5 tarsomeres black, mid tarsus entirely black; abdominal pleurae black on segments 5 and 6 and along upper portion of other segments, ventral portions contrastingly white, forming oval white ventral area on segments 2–4. Head: Pedicel and scape with only uniformly short setae; frontal vitta dull, weakly differentiated from orbits, virtually parallel-sided throughout, slightly raised in front of ocelli, slightly depressed behind ocelli and in anterior ⅔; 2 equal pairs of frontoorbital setae anterior to level of ocelli; postocellar, outer and inner vertical setae welldeveloped. Thorax: Cervical sclerite convex and dull, with lateral indentation and small anterolateral vertical carina; proepisternum with a few long, marginal ventral setae on posterior ½; katepisternum with double row of thin black setae, anterior row ½ as high as posterior row; scutellum with 1 pair of marginal setae and 2 small dorsal setae; no setae between postalar and dorsocentral setae; fore tarsus 1.3× length of remaining tarsomeres combined. Wing: CuA 2 distal to bmcu and meeting anal vein at distinct angle (ca 65°); wing membrane lightly and evenly infuscate; tegula and basicosta jetblack, contrasting with adjacent wing base. Female abdomen: Oviscape black, pruinose, except at apex; spermathecae similar to those of A. rufithorax, 1.5× as long as wide, more or less parallelsided, having transverse striations, base sinuate with very prominent lateral processes. Male: unknown. Holotype ♀: TANZANIA: Morogoro Region, Udzungwa Mts Nat. Park, 07°50'35''S 36°49'49''E, 11–13. xi.2009, 1000 m, T. Pape & S. A. Marshall (DEBU#00318741, deposited in ZMUC). Paratype ♀: Same data as holotype, in 95% alcohol (ZMUC). Other material examined: TANZANIA: “Tanganyika, W. Usambara Mts, 2100m, Magamba, iii.1962 ” (1 mouldy and psociddamaged ♀, CNCI). Material remarks: The non-type material examined is probably the same species as the specimens from the Udzungwa Mountains, but not designated as a paratype because of the poor condition of the specimen and also the disjunct locality. New material is required to either confirm that the distribution of A. undzungwa extends to the Usambara Mountains, or whether it is part of a closely related but disjunct pair of Eastern Arc species, like A. melasma and A. metamelasma. Comments: Despite the dark colour and the outer vertical setae, this species is similar to the previously described species of Aristobatina, and is probably more closely related to A. rufithorax and A. principalis than to the other species described here. The larger size, lack of longer setae on the pedicel, relatively strongly angled CuA 2 and the virtually identical spermathecae all suggest that these three species are closely related, although males are unknown for A. udzungwa sp. n. and no data are available on the spermathecae of A. principalis. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks go to Thomas Pape for making the Udzungwa Expedition possible, and for his excellent company in the field.Thanks also to Ashley KirkSpriggs for his substantive help in editing the manuscript.Specimens were collected under COSTECH permit 2012357NA2012147.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».