Acrolocha rogeri Shavrin, 2017, sp. n.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Acrolocha rogeri sp. n. (Figs. 1 −5) Type material examined. Holotype ♂ [A plastic card with the last abdominal segment, abdominal tergite and sternite VIII, and the aedeagus mounted in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen]: ‘ NEPAL: 8800`[underlined by yellow] | Kathmandu Dist., | Phulcoki, | 27.-31.v.1983.’ , ‘At MV | light’ , ‘M.J.D. Brendell | B.M. 1983-222’ , ‘HOLOTYPE | Acrolocha | rogeri sp.n. | Shavrin A.V. det. 2017 ’ (BMNH). Description. Measurements: WH: 0.42; LH: 0.28; LA: 0.56; LE: 0.15; LP: 0.35; WP: 0.45; LEl: 0.65; WE: 0.77; WA: 0.74; LAed: 0.32; TL: 1.87. Head and abdomen dark brown; antennomeres VI̅XI, pronotum, elytra, paratergites and apical margins of tergites brown; posterior margins of pronotum yellow brown; mouthparts, ocelli, antennomeres I̅V and legs yellow. Punctation of head irregular and sparse, moderately deep, somewhat denser on infraorbital ridges and frons; punctation of pronotum irregular, larger and deeper than that on head; scutellum impunctate; median portion of each elytron with small punctures arranged in six uneven longitudinal rows, irregularly scattered basally and apically, lateral portions of elytra with small sparse punctation not arranged into distinct rows; abdomen without visible punctation. Forebody glossy; head with coarse microsculpture: longitudinal between ocelli, transverse on vertex and cellulate on infraorbital ridges; pronotum with strong transverse wavy microsculpture; scutellum with small transverse microsculpture; elytra with fine and regular longitudinal microsculpture between punctures; abdominal tergites with cellular microsculpture, distinctly coarser and larger on tergites IV–V. Head 1.5 times as broad as long, with somewhat flattened frons and vertex, and slightly convex infraorbital ridges separated from vertex by straight longitudinal impressions merging with very short grooves beginning from anterior parts of each ocellus. Eyes large, convex; temples not apparent. Ocelli large, as large as diameter of two nearest punctures, distance between ocelli distinctly larger than distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Apical (4th) palpomeres of maxillari palpi more than three times as long as penultimate palpomeres. Antennae very short, not reaching posterior margin of pronotum when reclined; apical five antennomeres with dense pubescence; antennomeres with lengths × widths: 1: 0.10 × 0.05; 2: 0.05 × 0.05; 3: 0.03 × 0.02; 4̅5: 0.02 × 0.02; 6: 0.04 × 0.02; 7: 0.04 × 0.05; 8: 0.05 × 0.05; 9: 0.05 × 0.06; 10: 0.06 × 0.06; 11: 0.10 × 0.06. Pronotum slightly convex, 1.3 times as broad as long, slightly broader than head, widest about middle, gradually rounded anteriad and slightly narrowing towards posterior obtuse angles; middle part of anterior margin straight; surface of disc with two wide elongated depressions beginning in apical third of pronotum and almost reaching posterior margin. Elytra 1.2 times as broad as long, 1.8 times as long and 1.7 times as wide as pronotum, somewhat parallel-sided; hind margins of elytra straight. Metatrochanter without projection. Apical metatarsomeres distinctly longer than four preceeding tarsomeres. Abdomen slightly narrower than elytra, with two wide tomentose spots on abdominal tergite IV, with indistinct palisade fringe on apical margin of abdominal tergite VII. Male. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII (Fig. 4) and sternite VIII (Fig. 5) very slightly emarginated. Aedeagus (Fig. 1) broad, with moderately narrow elongated median lobe; parameres cylindrical, thick, exceeding apex of median lobe, with four long apical setae; apex of aedeagus with pair of lateral auriculate processes distinctly exceeding level of apices of parameres and with pair of tooth-like processes on level of median lobe; endophallus large and complicated, as in Fig. 2. Aedeagus laterally as in Fig. 3. Female unknown. Comparative notes. Based on the flattened head between eyes and character of microsculpture on the elytra, with punctures arranged in longitudinal rows, the new species is similar to A. horiguchii Watanabe, 2007 from Japan and A. kanagawana Watanabe, 2007, described from central Honshu (Watanabe 2007). From both species it differs by smaller punctures on the elytra, by the metatrochanter and the male abdominal sternite VIII lacking projections, as well as by the shape and internal structure of the aedeagus. The couplets 1 and 2 in the key to species of Acrolocha of the eastern Palaearctic Region in Shavrin & Smetana (2016) should be modified as follows: 1 Head between eyes flattened. Elytra without strong microsculpture, with punctures arranged in longitudinal rows .................. 2a - Head between eyes distinctly convex. Elytra with strong microsculpture, with or without punctures............................................. 3 2a Metatrochanters and male abdominal sternite VIII (Fig. 5) lacking median projections. Aedeagus as in Fig. 3. Nepal ................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................... A. rogeri sp.n. - Metatrochanters with posterior angulated projection (see Watanabe 2007: Figs 2, 7). Male abdominal sternite VIII with thin median projection. Japanese species ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Distribution. The new species is at present known only from the Phulcoki mountain in the vicinity of Kathmandu, Nepal. It is a new record of the genus for the Himalayan Region. Etymology. Patronymic, the species is named after Roger G. Booth (London).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».