MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6969192739 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7836916

Suberites latus Lambe 1893

2023· article· en· W6969192739 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine and coastal plant biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTable (database)Life tableIndian oceanCoastal zone

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Suberites aff. latus Lambe, 1893 (Figure 8, Figure 9, Table 8, Table 9) Type locality. North Coast of Vancouver Island, Canada (50°48′0″N 128°3′0″W). Material examined. Thirteen specimens. MNRJ 12882, Islote, Atenas Beach, Paracas, Ica (13°49′38.71′′S 76°18′07.41′′W), 1.8 m depth, coll. Y. Hooker, Ph. Willenz and & N. Mostajo, 13.XII.2008. MNRJ 13688, Bajo Norte, Foca Island, Piura (05°12′02.80″S 81°12′31.30″W), 14.3 m depth, coll. Y. Hooker, M. Rios & Ph. Willenz, 11.XII.2009. MNRJ 13697 and MNRJ 13698, Foca Island, Piura (05°11′43.70″S 81°12′57.80″W), 13.4 and 11.6 m depth, respectively, coll. Y. Hooker, M. Rios & Ph. Willenz, 13.XII.2009. MNRJ 14200, La Cabrillera, Foca Island, Piura (05°12′09.30″S 81°12′39.90″W), 10.7 m depth, coll. E. Hajdu and W. Vieira, 11.XII.2009. MNRJ 14202, Bajo Norte, Foca Island, Piura (05°12′02.80″S 81°12′31.30″W), 12 m depth, coll. E. Hajdu and W. Vieira, 11.XII.2009. UCSUR 07-000014, San Lorenzo Island 2, El Callao, Lima (12°05′23.07″S 77°11′45.24″W), 10 m depth, coll. L. Aguirre, XII. II.2010. UCSUR 07-000016, San Lorenzo Island 1, El Callao, Lima (12° 5′46.71″S 77°11′29.46″W), 5 m depth, coll. L. Aguirre, IX. XII.2009. UCSUR 07-000052, Atenas Beach, Paracas, Ica (13°49′13.16″S 76°18′2.81″W), 7 m depth, coll. K. Farfán, 01.II.2019. UCSUR 07-000054, Station P 06, Pachacamac Islands, Lima (12°17′40.49′′S 76°53′53.89′′W), 5 m depth, coll. B. Moreno, 04.III.2019. UCSUR 07-000068, La Vuelta, Pucusana, Lima (12°28′01.89′′S 76°47′55.36′′W), 10 m depth, coll. D. Cuba, 09. V.2019. UCSUR 07-000074, Island of Pucusana, Pucusana, Lima (12°28′41.64″S 76°47′54.96″W), intertidal, coll. G. de la Cruz, 05.X.2019. UCSUR 07-000077, Emisor de Sechura, Piura (05°42′19.27″S 80°51′27.44″W), 7 m of depth, coll. C. Gutierrez & L. Aguirre, 7.IX.2019. Description. Thin encrusting to massive (Fig. 8A, 9A), with rather small lobes (Fig. 9B). Largest specimen (UCSUR 07-000077) measures 8.8 x 4.1 x 5.9 cm (length x width x height). Notable and small oscula (≤ 3 mm), scattered on the surface or situated on top of the lobes (Fig. 8A, B, 9A, B). Slightly compressible texture and somewhat hispid surface, but soft to the touch. Colour. Orange in life (Fig. 8A, B, 9A, B), fading into light brown, light beige, light grey or dirty white in ethanol. Skeleton. Ectosomal, dense layer of small and large tylostyles arranged in tufts (Fig. 8C, D, 9C). Choanosomal skeleton formed by ascending multispicular tracts of large tylostyles towards the surface, surprisingly resembling a reticulated arrangement (Fig. 8D, 9C). These tracts form an erratic path, leaving polygonal meshes behind. Spicules. Megascleres. Tylostyles I, small, ectosomal, mostly curved and with sharp apex (70–203 x 2–8 μm, Fig. 8E, 9D, Table 8). Tylostyles II, large, ectosomal and choanosomal, slightly bent and with sharp apex (150–310 x 2–10 μm, Fig. 8F, 9E, Table 8). All tylostyles are thickest in the middle and bear well marked tyles (I: 3–8 μm; II: 5–10 μm, Fig. 8G, H, 9F, G). Microscleres. Centrotylote strongyles or oxeas, ectosomal and spined, common, rare, or absent (17–50 μm, Fig. 9H–K, Table 8). Ecology. This species was found attached to hard substrate (natural or artificial). Specimens from the southernmost localities (Paracas and Pucusana) were close to red algae, anemones (Anthotoe chilensis), mytillids and decapods. Specimens at Foca Island were found growing on barnacles and subject to strong currents, and one of them (UCSUR 07-000077) was collected associated with a small crab and amphipods. Previous reports indicate that S. latus was generally found on Pagurus hermit crabs or less frequently, on mollusc shells (Lambe 1893; de Laubenfels 1961; Lee et al. 2007; Austin et al. 2014). Geographical and bathymetrical distributions. Suberites latus has a wide distribution range in the NE Pacific, including British Columbia (Lambe 1893; Austin et al. 2014), Alaska (Lambe 1895; Austin et al. 2014), California (de Laubenfels 1932; Lee et al. 2007), Oregon (Long 1968) and Washington (de Laubenfels 1961; Long 1968) and has been reported down to 183 m depth (Lambe 1895; Lee et al. 2007; Austin et al. 2014). Suberites aff. latus occurs along the coasts of Peru in Foca Island (05°), San Lorenzo Island, Pachacamac Islands, Pucusana (12°) and Paracas (14°). MEOW in Peru: Guayaquil, Central Peru and Humboldtian ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007). From intertidal to 14 m depth (this study). Remarks. Suberites latus was originally described by Lambe (1893) as a subhemispheric and broadly lobated sponge, with confused choanosomal structure, composed of two tylostyle categories (I: 170 x 9 μm; II: 294–524 x 13 μm), occurring in British Columbia. Briefly after, Lambe (1895) reviewed his previous specimens adding new ones from Alaska and found centrotylote strongyles (32 x 3–4.9 μm). Further descriptions of this species claimed to confirm these characteristics (Lambe 1895; Laubenfels 1961; Lee et al. 2007; Austin et al. 2014; Table 9). The Peruvian specimens mostly match the descriptions of Austin et al. (2014) from NE Pacific, mainly in the skeleton arrangement and spicule characteristics. In our analysed specimens, the tendency to form reticulated choanosomal meshes, the presence of ectosomal tufts of small and large tylostyles and the two categories of tylostyles and centrotylote strongyles/oxeas of similar sizes were also observed. Concerning the presence of microscleres, Austin et al. (2014) indicated that microspined centrotylote strongyles/oxeas could be common, rare, or absent among specimens, which is also observed in the specimens from Peru, without any notorious restriction by location. Despite this, there are some differences. While species of Austin et al. (2014) can have encrusting to massive amorphous form and brownish yellow to brownish red-orange colour in life, the Peruvian specimens are encrusting to massive but with rather small lobes and orange in life. Moreover, Austin et al. (2014) reported S. latus from deeper (150 m) subarctic waters (Alaska). *Misprint for 380 or 480 (Austin et al. 2014) The distance of the over 7,000 km existing between the occurrences of the Peruvian specimens and what was until now known as S. latus, besides the differences aforementioned, lead us to conclude that our Peruvian species should be better assigned as Suberites aff. latus. In previous descriptions of S. latus, there has been no mention of a reticulated skeleton, but rather a confused one (Lambe 1893; de Laubenfels 1932; Lee et al. 2007). In addition, S. latus is usually found associated with hermit crabs (Lambe 1893; de Laubenfels 1961; Lee et al. 2007; Austin et al. 2014), which was not observed in the specimens collected in Peru. Considering the species previously reported from the SE Pacific, namely Suberites cranium Hajdu, DesqueyrouxFaúndez, Carvalho, Lôbo-Hajdu & Willenz, 2013 from Chiloé Island (Chile), S. puncturatus Thiele, 1905 from Coquimbo (Chile) and S. ruber Thiele, 1905 from Almirantazgo Sound (Chile), clear differences can be highlighted when compared with the specimens from Peru. Suberites cranium presents nearly hemispheric habitus, ectosomal skeleton in palisade composed of tylostyles, mostly confused choanosomal skeleton and thicker tylostyles in both size categories (≤ 16 μm). Different from S. aff. latus, S. puncturatus presents tylostrongyles and S. ruber bears choanosomal tylostyles which are larger (≤ 700 μm), often sinuous and with heads irregularly shaped. Moreover, none of these species bears microscleres.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,095

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMarine and coastal plant biology→Travaux en français237 207→