MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6969361766 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6628942

Lepus othus Merriam 1900

2016· article· en· W6969361766 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTundraArcticBeringiaPeninsulaPopulationPhylogeographyCircumpolar star

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

58. Alaskan Hare Lepus othus French: Lievre d / Alaska / German: Alaska-Hase / Spanish: Liebre de Alaska Other common names: Alaska Arctic Hare, Alaska Peninsula Hare, Alaska Tundra Hare, St. Michael's Hare, Tundra Hare, Swift Hare Taxonomy. Lepus othus Merriam, 1900, “St. Michaels, [Norton Sound], Alaska,” USA. Formerly, the three arctic species, L. timidus, L. arcticus, and L. othus, were included in L. timidus based on morphological characteristics that, relative to their distributions, form a circumpolar “ring species.” This is also supported by genetic analysis of mtDNA, although evidence based only on mtDNA should be treated cautiously. There is also the view that two species exist: L. timidus in the Old World and L. arcticus in Greenland, northern Canada, Alaska, and the Chukchi Peninsula, Russia. Other lagomorph taxonomists consider that L. arcticus is conspecific with L. timidus and distinct from L. othus. Until conclusive evidence is available, the three species are considered to be distinct with L. timidus in the Old World, L. othus in Alaska, and L. arcticus in northern Canada and Greenland. Nevertheless, the border between L. timidus and L. othus is not clear and might be either in the Bering Strait or in the Kolyma region, Russia. Recent molecular phylogenetic study suggests that the break occurs in the Bering Strait, but more studies are required for a conclusive demarcation because the study was only based on mtDNA. If the distribution includes eastern Siberian tschuktschorum it has priority over othus. Recent molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that the eastern Siberian population is more closely related to L. timidus, and L. othus is distinct from L. arcticus, but more studies are required for a conclusive distinction because the study was only based on mtDNA. Morphological studies found that L. othusis closer to L. townsendii than to other northern species of Lepus. Lepus othusis partially sympatric with L. americanus in Alaska. As taxonomists are still trying to clarify the species differentiation in Lepus, the subspecific taxonomy is not elaborated yet. The original descriptions of the subspecies are often not very helpful as they are mostly based on few exterior characteristics and small numbers of individuals. It has been shown that the variability is clinal in more careful investigations. Hence, the distinction in subspecies might be arbitrary and unreasonable. Three subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. L. o. othusMerriam, 1900 — WAlaska (USA). L. o. poadromusMerriam, 1900 — AlaskaPeninsula (USA). L. o. tschuktschorum Nordqvist, 1883 — Chukchi Peninsula, NE Siberia (Russia). Descriptive notes. Head-body 570-620 mm, tail 65-83 mm, ear 90-91 mm, hindfoot 164-179 mm; weight 3.9-4.8 kg. The Alaskan Hare is large. Winter pelage is white, except for black ear tips. In summer, fur on nose, sides of face, and top of head is cinnamon-buff; top of head appears darker. General color of back is drab cinnamon. Ears are similar in color to head on anterior one-half of outer surface, but posterior one-half is white. Frontlegs are white, with wash of cinnamon-buff; hindlegs are white, washed with brown. Molting occurs twice per year and starts in mid-September and early May. The Alaskan Hare has stout claws adapted to digging through hard-crusted snow to reach vegetation. Habitat. Tundra of coastal regions of Alaska from sea level to elevations over 600 m. The Alaskan Hare occurs almost completely outside the limit of spruce (Picea, Pinaceae) forests. It lives in dense alder (Alnus, Butalaceae) thickets. Near the Kashunuk River, it was found in all habitats from sedge (Carex, Cyperaceae) flats and wet meadows to upperslopes of the Askinuk Mountains with vegetation dominated by sedge; lyme grass (Elymus arenarius, Poaceae); Potentilla egedei (Rosaceae); Poa eminens (Poaceae); crowberry (Empetrum nigrum, Ericaceae); willow (Salix, Salicaceae); Ledum decumbens/ Rhododendron subarcticum (Ericaceae); dwarf birch (Betula nana) and green alder (Al nus crispa), both Betulaceae; ferns (Dryopteris); and lichens. Northern populations of Alaskan Hares primarily live in tundra or alluvial plains, and southern populations primarily live in coastal lowlands. Food and Feeding. Diet of the Alaskan Hare in April/May consists mainly of shrubs. Woody parts of the Alaskan willow (S. alaxensis) and leaves of crowberry are most commonly eaten. In spring, they fed at edges of melting snow patches where crowberries from the previous summer were abundant. One captive Alaskan Hare seldom drank water. Breeding. Mating season of the Alaskan Hare occurs in mid-April and May, and gestation is ¢.46 days. Parturition occurs in late May and early June and seems to coincide with loss of snow cover in late May. Females have one litter per year, with 5-7 young (average 6-3 young). Precocial young are born in a nest aboveground in thick shelter of willow or alder. Nests are mere depressions in the vegetation and have no lining. Young have brownish buff upper parts and white under parts. Nose, eye rings, and feet are buff. Ear tips are black, and tail is white. Female Alaskan Hares nurse 5-9 weeks—a prolonged nursing period probably enhances survival of young and perpetuates rapid growth. A few weeks after birth, young begin to drift away from their mother. Rapid growth allows young to reach minimum adult body mass during the short summer; young are fully grown by late September. Initial rate of growth of the Alaskan Hare is greater than that of the Snowshoe Hare (L. americanus), the Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus), and the White-tailed Jackrabbit (L. townsendi). Activity patterns. Alaskan Hares leave dense thickets in the evening to feed. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Alaskan Hares live alone, except during mating when groups of 20 or more are observed. If they still have their winter pelage in May, they remain near snowfields at high elevations. One captive Alaska Hare never attempted to seek shelter during snow and rain. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Populations of Alaskan Hares seem to be widespread and stable, although little monitoring occurs. Native people modestly harvest Alaskan Hares for food and fur. Southern populations might be subject to habitat loss and climate change, although the latter is speculative. Research is needed to assess taxonomic status of the Alaskan Hare relative to the Mountain Hare (L. timidus) and the Arctic Hare (L. arcticus) and evaluate habitat use and population status and trends. Bibliography. Anderson (1974), Anderson & Lent (1977), Angermann (2016), Baker et al. (1983), Ben Slimen, Suchentrunk & Ben Ammar Elgaaied (2008), Best & Henry (1994b), Bittner & Rongstad (1982), Dufresne (1946), Flux (1983), Flux & Angermann (1990), Hall (1981), Hewson (1991), Hoffmann & Smith (2005), Howell (19364), Lissovsky (2016), Loukashkin (1943), Merriam (1900), Murie (1959), Murray & Smith (2008c), Nelson (1909), Schiller & Rausch (1956), Walkinshaw (1947), Waltari & Cook (2005), Waltari et al. (2004), Wu Chunhua et al. (2005).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEvolution and Paleontology StudiesTravaux en français237 207